METALS INSIDER:Stockpiling can be bad for your health
-- Andy Home is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own --
By Andy Home
LONDON, Mar 11 (Reuters) - China, as every reader of this column should know by now, is snapping up metals at the recent cycle lows to add to its "strategic reserves."
For a current list, click on [ID:nPEK179560].
The government stockpile manager, the State Reserve Bureau (SRB), has already bought copper, aluminium, zinc and indium and has most recently turned its attention to nickel. [ID: nPEK202679]
However, there are "strategic reserves" and there are "strategic reserves". The result may be the same but the difference lies in the motivation and, correspondingly, the likely outcome.
STRUCTURALLY SHORT
Copper, for example, is an obvious target for the SRB.
Copper is an industrial metal that lies at the heart of China's recent economic growth and it is a metal of which China is structurally short.
The country has in recent years been a massive net importer of copper cathode, copper alloy, copper anode, copper concentrates and copper scrap, i.e. at every stage of the supply chain.
For this reason the SRB has long been a major player in the copper market, historically buying during times of surplus and selling at times of deficit.
There has, it is true, been the occasional hiccough, such as in 2006, when the Bureau had to deliver a significant tonnage back to LME warehouses against problematic short positions put on by disgraced trader Liu Qibing.
However, the "strategic reserve" has generally fulfilled its function of maintaining supply to Chinese consumers during times of tightness and ultra-high prices.
The Bureau is back in the copper market, once again hoovering up units at what it evidently feels are bargain-basement prices. It may or not be right on the last point but its key advantage is that it can wait until it is right.
Even now, in the trough of recession, analysts are fretting about what low copper prices will mean for already dysfunctional mine supply going forward. There were already too few new mine projects in the pipeline and even fewer in China.
At some stage in the future, whether 2, 3 or 5 years, the copper currently being bought by the SRB is going to come in useful.
STRUCTURALLY LONG
Aluminium has played an equally important role in China's industrialization and urbanization but the SRB has not been an active player in the international aluminium market in recent years.
That's because it hasn't needed to be.
Far from being structurally short of aluminium, China has become the world's largest producer and, in the most recent period, the fastest-growing producer of the light metal.
The country has been a significant net exporter of primary aluminium, aluminium alloy and aluminium products.
Why then has the SRB already bought 590,000 tonnes with more buys expected to come ? Not to cushion a country that is already self-sufficient from the vagaries of international supply, surely ?
The answer was given to Reuters by Zhang Yuanxin, director of the Guangxi branch of the all-powerful economic planning ministry, the National Development and Reform Commission.
Guangxi and other provinces are following in the central government's footsteps by creating "mini strategic reserves."
"Right now demand is not so good, production is below cost. Smelters are not making any profit. So they don't want to produce and if they're not producing they may cut jobs," said Zhang.
In other words, "strategic" purchases in this context equate to keeping key producers in business during the current price trough.
It's noticeable that the SRB's purchases have been from a relatively small, elite group in the aluminium smelter sector, the same elite that have just been granted the right to negotiate power prices directly with producers as a means of securing potential cheaper power [ID:nHKG187374].
Beijing's intentions are clear but the results may not be what the Chinese authorities intended.
BUYER OF FIRST RESORT
The SRB has paid above market rates for its aluminium, a premium of 15 percent in the first auction in December and one of 5 percent in the second auction in February.
That has no doubt been of great assistance to the cash-strapped sellers but it has also dragged local prices higher, creating an arbitrage opportunity with London.
This is reversing historical trade patterns.
China switched to net importer of primary and alloy in January for the first time since March 2007. The snapshot of February's trade figures suggests the country remained a net importer last month.
More metal is on its way to China with locals expecting a surge of up to 130,000 tonnes to hit the country over March and April, pretty much the same amount that entered Chinese customs over the whole of last year [ID:nHKG108709].
The Chinese government is rapidly becoming the aluminium market of first resort. Rather than protecting its core producers, it risks exposing them to the full force of global surplus as imports add to existing domestic market surplus.
In other happier times Beijing could simply adjust its import taxes to discourage the flow of metal into the country but after lambasting the United States for the "buy American" component of its fiscal stimulus package, any move towards protectionism is politically risky.
As such, the Bureau may have to be prepared to buy up a lot more surplus aluminium in the coming period to keep its national favourites afloat.
It may also have to do so for much longer than it might have hoped, since subsidized pricing, which is what the current buying programme amounts to, will do nothing to resolve the underlying problem in the aluminium market, which is one of surplus smelter capacity, particularly in China.
The combination of surplus production capacity and massive surplus stocks overhang is not a happy one for the aluminium market and it may turn out to be a very unhappy one indeed for both the Bureau and the very producers it is seeking to shield from the aluminium price collapse.
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters