Dutch doctors' group calls for circumcision ban

Related Topics

AMSTERDAM | Thu May 27, 2010 6:37pm BST

AMSTERDAM (Reuters Life!) - The Royal Dutch Medical Association on Thursday suggested a possible ban on elective circumcisions for young boys, saying they were medically unnecessary and violated children's rights.

The 161-year-old organization, which represents more than 46,000 doctors and students, called the procedure "a violation of the integrity of the body."

The group, known by its Dutch initials KNMG, proposed a dialogue between doctors and religious groups on the issue.

Most non-therapeutic circumcisions in the Netherlands are performed on religious grounds. In the capital of Amsterdam, parents seeking circumcisions for elective reasons are often referred to a small clinic in a heavily Muslim neighborhood.

"KNMG sees good reasons for a legal ban on non-therapeutic circumcisions, but fears that this will lead to the operation going underground," it said in a statement.

In a column on the KNMG's website, chairman Arie Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman said some 80 percent of the group's members agreed circumcision should be discouraged.

According to a 2007 World Health Organization report, some 30 percent of men worldwide are circumcised.

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz, editing by Paul Casciato)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
RestoreTally wrote:
Now if only the doctor’s groups in the United States would be so enlightened to come out against male infant circumcision.

His body, his choice.

May 27, 2010 12:35am BST  --  Report as abuse
PDHoath wrote:
A recent study in the USA put the death rate from neonatal circumcision as 9.1 per 100,000 operations with, of course, many more non-fatal operation complications (Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies, Volume 4, Number 1 / Spring 2010, pages 78-90)
Religious freedom is the freedom of an adult to choose the religion of their choice, not the freedom to impose a religion or indelible religious body modifications on an infant boy.

May 28, 2010 6:04pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.