European recession next year "almost inevitable" - Soros

Related Topics

U.S. billionaire investor George Soros delivers his keynote speech during a Institute of International Finance (IIF) conference in Vienna June 10, 2010. REUTERS/Heinz-Peter Bader

U.S. billionaire investor George Soros delivers his keynote speech during a Institute of International Finance (IIF) conference in Vienna June 10, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Heinz-Peter Bader

LONDON | Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:16pm BST

LONDON (Reuters) - Europe faces almost inevitable recession next year and years of stagnation as policymakers' response to the euro zone crisis causes a downward spiral, billionaire U.S. investor George Soros said on Tuesday.

Flaws built into the euro from the start had become acute, Soros told a seminar, warning that the euro crisis could have the potential to destroy the 27-nation European Union.

The euro's lack of a correction mechanism or of a provision for countries to leave it could be a fatal weakness, he said.

Germany had imposed its criteria on how a 750 billion euro (674 billion pounds) euro zone rescue mechanism should be used and was imposing its own standards -- a trade surplus and a high savings rate -- on the rest of Europe, Soros said.

"But you can't be a creditor country, a surplus country, without somebody being in deficit," he said.

"That's the real danger of the present situation -- that by imposing fiscal discipline at a time of insufficient demand and a weak banking system, by wanting to have a balanced budget you are actually ... setting in motion a downward spiral," he said.

Germany would do relatively well because the decline in the euro had boosted its economy, he told the seminar on the euro zone crisis organised by two thinktanks, the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Centre for European Reform.

"Germany is going to smell like roses but (the rest of) Europe is going to be pushed into a downward spiral, stagnation lasting many years and possibly worse than that," he said.

"In other words, I think a recession next year is almost inevitable given the current policies," Soros said, later clarifying that he meant a recession in Europe as a whole.

WARNS OF SOCIAL UNREST

"If there is no exit, (it) is liable to give rise to social unrest and, if you follow the line, social unrest can give rise to demand for law and order and (sow the) seeds of what happened in the inter-war period," he said.

Political will to forge a common fiscal policy in Europe was absent and since Europe was liable to move backwards if it did not advance, "the crisis of the euro could actually have the potential of destroying the European Union," he said.

European banks had bought large amounts of the sovereign bonds of weaker euro zone countries for a tiny interest rate differential, Soros said.

"That's one of the reasons why the banks are so over-leveraged and why the German and the French banks own Spanish bonds," he said.

"Now ... they have a loss on their balance sheets which is not recognised and it reduces the credibility of those banks so the banking system is in serious trouble," he said.

"The commercial paper market, for instance, in America is now refusing to lend to European banks so there is even a funding crisis and the ECB (European Central Bank) has to step in and the banks are unwilling to lend to each other," he said.

(Editing by Chizu Nomiyama.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Osomec wrote:
Let’s hope he is right. A recession would be a small price to pay to destroy the European Union. If that happens, European politicians will actually have to start thinking about running their own countries better, instead of their current obsession with building an anti-democratic superstate.

Jun 15, 2010 10:13pm BST  --  Report as abuse
JasiekJasiek wrote:
The first comment is based on his/her incorrect interpretation of what Solos says. He means that if every state in the euro area is export-oriented like Germany there will be a (structure of) huge gap of supply and demand that will remain for decades. This phenomenon is exactly equal to what you have been seeing in the “yen area” – Japan – since the 1990s.

Three possible, though still uncertain, solutions for the EU could take are:
1. It should become a second US, a deficit economy, which requires a currency and the military strength that guarantees the currency
2. It should remain export-oriented as a whole to boost deficit, by trying every means, in other major economies such as the US and the BRICs
3. It should make an export-oriented giant within, namely Germany, to reduce its tendency to strike the current account surplus

The first is fantasy military-wise and the second quite precarious (because this option disregards business cycle) whereas the third looks the most feasible. The current fiscal crisis in some euro area states comes from the big mistake that their former currencies were pegged to either the euro or ecu too high compare to the future current account tendencies. The rate of drachma to euro when the Greek currency was pegged appeared appropriate but actually not. This gives a lesson – when Poland, the largest economy in the CEE, pegs its currency it should be (pegged) much cheaper than it is now so that the supplying power of goods will be transferred from the current euro area over to Poland, by which means every state in the euro area will not have to be export-oriented. On the contrary, in the interwar period every state in Europe was competing with the others that stimulated fascists and socialist democrats, neither of the nationalists – yes, socialist democrats are always nationalists actually in an economic downturn – had the notion of business cycle (= either Austrian school, Lange or Kalecki) but clang to the employment (Keynes). The War followed.

The commenter, seemingly either a fascist or social democrat more or less, is fundamentally wrong because he/she regards that the European Union as a body that is transferring itself to an anti-democratic superstate. No, it is not. It is simply that the constituency is indifferent to the European Parliament, which is letting the Brussels elites do whatever they want.

Jun 15, 2010 12:18am BST  --  Report as abuse
CO2-Exhaler wrote:
The one-size-fits-all euro straitjacket is on the way out. Whose fault it is scarcely matters any more. The fact is that several countries should never have joined the euro, and they are now wishing that they hadn’t. The rest wish they had never allowed those countries in, and wish they could think of a way to boot them out. Well it serves them all right, because the so-called European project has long since been hijacked by politicians and bureaucrats throughout the European continent whose only ambitions appear to be power and more power at any cost, whether elected or not (and huge financial advancement and pensions into the bargain). The European Commission is the most undemocratic institution in Europe since the demise of the Third Reich, while the idea of the European Parliament delivering democracy is as absurd as the Duma delivering democracy to the people of Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan – need I list any more?

Jun 16, 2010 5:48pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.