Apology to BP's Hayward triggers uproar

Related Topics

Quotes

   

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:19pm BST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Republican U.S. representative apologized to BP CEO Tony Hayward on Thursday, saying BP was victim of a White House "shakedown" by having to set up a $20 billion (13.5 billion pound) Gulf oil spill fund, a comment that angered both Democrats and Republicans.

Joe Barton of Texas, a major recipient of oil and gas industry campaign contributions, received such ridicule for his unusual apology to the oil giant that he later retracted his statement.

At the start of a congressional hearing featuring testimony from Hayward, Barton said it was "a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, a $20 billion shakedown."

"I'm speaking totally for myself, I'm not speaking for the Republican Party ... but I'm ashamed of what happened in the White House yesterday," Barton told Hayward.

Hours later, Barton retracted his statement, after Vice President Joe Biden condemned the comments as "outrageous" and the Republican leaders of the House of Representatives issued a joint statement denouncing them.

"I apologise for using the term 'shakedown' with regard to yesterday's actions at the White House in my opening statement this morning, and I retract my apology to BP," Barton said.

He added: "I regret the impact that my statement this morning implied that BP should not pay for the consequences of their decisions and actions in this incident."

Barton's statement had put his own Republicans on the defensive and gave hope to Democrats searching for any way to fend off expected losses to Republicans in November 2 congressional elections.

At the White House, President Barack Obama shook his head in response and said, "I don't know why anyone would say that," said spokesman Robert Gibbs.

Obama on Wednesday pressured BP to set up the compensation fund for the Gulf spill during a meeting at the White House.

'INCREDIBLY INSENSITIVE'

"I find it incredibly insensitive, incredibly out of touch," Biden told reporters. "There's no shakedown. It's insisting on responsible conduct and a responsible response to something they caused."

Barton's position was politically perilous because Americans largely blame BP for the devastating spill and want the huge company to pay for it.

His stance was bound to be unpopular in the Gulf region, where the spill is wreaking havoc on the economy -- fishermen are out of work and hotel and restaurants are struggling in an area heavily dependent on tourism.

Republican House leaders John Boehner, Eric Cantor and Mike Pence disassociated themselves from Barton.

"Congressman Barton's statements this morning were wrong. BP itself has acknowledged that responsibility for the economic damages lies with them and has offered an initial pledge of $20 billion dollars for that purpose," they said.

Even Hayward disagreed with Barton's description of the escrow account as a "slush fund."

"I certainly don't think it was a slush fund," he told the hearing.

The White House's Gibbs said Republicans should ask themselves whether Barton should be their party's leading representative on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. There was some talk of Barton losing his position.

BARTON NOT ALONE

But Barton was not alone among Republicans who question the $20 billion fund.

Georgia Representative Tom Price, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, a group of conservative House members, issued a statement arguing the same point.

Price said BP's willingness to go along with the White House's new fund suggests that the Obama administration is "hard at work exerting its brand of Chicago-style shakedown politics."

And former Texas Republican Representative Dick Armey, who was House majority leader and is a leading voice in the conservative Tea Party movement, told a Christian Science Monitor breakfast this week that Obama lacks the constitutional authority to set up such a fund.

In addition, conservative Republican Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota told the Heritage Foundation think tank that the escrow account was a "redistribution-of-wealth fund."

Barton is the biggest recipient of oil and gas industry campaign contributions in the House of Representatives, according to the nonpartisan Centre for Responsive Politics.

Its data showed that Barton has collected $1,447,880 from political action committees and individuals connected with the oil and gas industry since 1989.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, Susan Cornwell, David Morgan, Jeff Mason, Matt Spetalnick, Timothy Gardner, Deborah Zabarenko and Jackie Frank, editing by Vicki Allen)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
GROCK wrote:
I think that Senator Bartons comment in the first one was correct. This whole episode is in the nature of mob rule by the Mafia. Is it still alive and well in the form of Americas Parliament? I have not seen such personal insults made by people who are the Countries governers and seem incapable of running an enquiry in a civilised non personal manner. They act like a pack of baying wolves after blood for bloods sake.
This was a terrible accident with currently tragic consequences which requires all to pull together to overcome and until the Industries enquiry as what what and why this accident occurred then individual and personal blame cannot be apportioned.
BP had made significant voluntary offers in respect of compensation and yet this enquiry acts like a bunch of back street muggers not satisfied with being offered the wallet and watch but want to cut off the head just to satisfy their bloodlust egos. They should be ashamed of their insults, I would not vote for any one of them, they dishonour normal human decent behaviour.

Jun 18, 2010 9:18am BST  --  Report as abuse
Pete57 wrote:
Senator Barton was right first time, no need to apologize for telling the truth. Bully boy coercion at its worst, from an administration devoid of morals, which has released the greedy wolves without thought to the consequences.

Jun 18, 2010 11:16am BST  --  Report as abuse
canadaheh wrote:
Congress is a bunch of loud mouthed politicians trying (pitifully) to get a pat on the back from the Pres. and public. Didn’t work. Being forced to retract doesn’t change the truth either. Congress got stone-walled. Cheers Tony Hayward.

Jun 18, 2010 7:47pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.