Clegg says Iraq invasion was "illegal"

A video grab shows Britain's deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg (2nd L), addressing the House of Commons during Prime Ministers Questions in London July 21, 2010. REUTERS/Parbul

A video grab shows Britain's deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg (2nd L), addressing the House of Commons during Prime Ministers Questions in London July 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Parbul

LONDON | Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:35pm BST

LONDON (Reuters) - Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg described the 2003 invasion of Iraq as illegal on Wednesday, putting the new coalition government under pressure to clarity its position on the war.

The Liberal Democrat leader was speaking in parliament while deputising for Prime Minister David Cameron who was on a visit to the United States.

Cameron, like most of his Conservative Party -- the senior coalition partners -- supported Britain's involvement in the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq under the previous Labour government.

A spokeswoman for the prime minister said the Lib Dem leader was only expressing his view. She could not say what the coalition's exact position on the matter was.

Clegg's remark was intended as a jibe against Jack Straw, who was foreign secretary during the invasion.

"I am happy to account for everything that we are doing in this coalition government, a coalition government which has brought together two parties working in the national interest to sort out the mess that he left behind," Clegg said during an unusually tetchy exchange.

"Maybe one day, and perhaps we'll have to wait for his (Straw's) memoirs, he could account for his role in the most disastrous decision of all, which is the illegal invasion of Iraq," he added.

Faced with repeated questioning at a news conference whether this represented government policy or a view endorsed by Cameron, the spokeswoman said: "The deputy prime minister is entitled to his own view."

"I don't believe the coalition government has a specific view on the legality of the Iraq war," she added.

An inquiry headed by former civil servant John Chilcot is looking into the Iraq war, but its goal is to learn lessons from the conflict and not to rule on its legality.

Britain has withdrawn its troops from Iraq but has 9,500 soldiers in Afghanistan. A rising death toll there is leading to increased public concern over the campaign.

Clegg's remark came as a YouGov poll for the Sun newspaper showed support for his party fell to 14 percent, the lowest it has been since February 2009.

Its poll standing had been as high as 34 percent before the May election which cast the traditionally third-place party into an alliance with the Conservatives.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
thorpeman wrote:
I dont know about it being illegal. It was wrong it was based on a dosier that becomes ever more dodgy as the Chilcot enquiry goes on and rather than Blair & Labour acting on what advice came from MI5 they seem to have acted against that advice and plunged the UK into a conflict that was brought to our own shores on 7/7 I hope Mr Blair can sleep easy i the knowlege that so many people were against the invasion based on sound advice and so many people have lost their lives defending Blairs Labour governments lies.

Jul 21, 2010 8:55pm BST  --  Report as abuse
neversaydie wrote:
The legality of any “war” is always open to question but this was not a war it was “regime change”. Costing the UK alone, billions of pounds, hundreds of UK service personnel lives and thousands of Iraqi lives. Include in that cost the 7/7 tragedy and the radicalization of thousands of UK muslims. Leading to an unpresidented amount of spending on counter terroism. So the question is WHY did we ignore “advice” from MI5, probably the best in the business.

Jul 22, 2010 8:20am BST  --  Report as abuse
racingintime wrote:
If it is established that the war was illegal and only then, the question must be asked should Mr Bliar and those in his cabinet who knew the truth and Mr Bush be put on trail for war crimes as leaders of any other country would be.

Jul 22, 2010 4:50pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.