No charge for police officer over G20 protest death

LONDON Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:05pm BST

Newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson, 47, who later died, is taken to an ambulance after he became caught up in demonstrations near the Bank of England in London April 1, 2009. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

Newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson, 47, who later died, is taken to an ambulance after he became caught up in demonstrations near the Bank of England in London April 1, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - A riot squad officer, filmed shoving a man to the ground during violent G20 protests in London last year, will not face criminal charges over his death, Britain's chief prosecutor said on Thursday.

Ian Tomlinson, 47, died after being caught up in a demonstration outside the Bank of England where confrontations between anti-capitalist groups, environmental campaigners and riot police had broken out.

The newspaper-seller was walking slowly with his hands in his pockets away from a line of riot squad officers when one moved forward, hit him on the leg with a baton and then pushed him forcefully in the back.

Tomlinson collapsed shortly afterwards and died.

"After a thorough and careful review of the evidence, the Crown Prosecution Service has decided there is no realistic prospect of a conviction against the police officer in question for any offences ... and no charges should be brought against him," said the Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer.

He said conflicting medical evidence meant that a prosecution case could not be proved beyond doubt. The lawyer for Tomlinson's family said it was a disgraceful decision.

Tomlinson had been on his way home and had not been taking part in the protests which were held as leaders of the G20 nations gathered in the capital to discuss the global financial crisis.


Starmer said Tomlinson had posed no threat to the police officer or his colleagues and that there was sufficient evidence to show that his actions had constituted an assault.

But he said a "sharp disagreement" between medical experts meant a successful prosecution for manslaughter was unlikely.

An initial post-mortem recorded that Tomlinson had died from a heart attack, but two further checks showed the cause of death to be internal bleeding.

"The CPS would simply not be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that there was a causal link between Mr Tomlinson's death and the alleged assault upon him," Starmer said.

He said other offences were considered but ruled out, including a charge of common assault which Starmer admitted could not be brought as there was a six-month time limit.

"The CPS are clearly admitting that the police officer assaulted our dad -- why is there no charge?" Paul King, Tomlinson's son told reporters.

"We feel very let down, very disappointed. Another copper has been let off. You ain't heard the last of us yet."

The family lawyer Jules Carey said they would consider appealing against the "disgraceful" decision.

"There needs to be an inquiry into exactly why nothing's happened today and what the failure is," he said.

The Metropolitan Police said it was waiting for the Independent Police Complaints Commission's (IPCC) report before deciding whether the officer should face misconduct proceedings.

In March, another riot squad officer Sergeant Delroy Smellie, who was captured on video footage hitting a woman with his metal baton during protests the day after Tomlinson's death, was cleared of assault after the judge accepted he had been acting in self-defence.

Hundreds of complaints were made about excessive violence by some officers during the G20 demonstrations on April 1 and 2, and the police's tactics have been widely condemned in reports by politicians, the IPCC and Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary.

(Editing by Steve Addison)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
cynic1948 wrote:
The thugs in the Police (and there are many of them) will now know they can kill with impunity.

A Police Officer can not be disciplined for any offence – any and all complaints against them are dismissed.

Jul 22, 2010 1:00pm BST  --  Report as abuse
MelissaMel wrote:
Corruption! I always knew the police had a ”license to kill” (Lowkey), but so blatantly, that it’s publicised?? The justice system in this country is disgraceful. Police officers arrest people to meet targets, while dangerous people are left to roam the streets.
Who was paid what amount of money to come to this verdict? Video footage of Ian Tomlinson with his hands in his pockets was made available for all to view….the officer is then NOT CHARGED with anything. I’m sure if I or anybody else had done that, we would have been charged for manslaughter, served time etc.
Police ARE above the law that was the point to this exercise; to show us what they can get away with. The government, police, justice system = corrupt!!
I hope a protest is held to condemn this decision, it goes against everyone’s human rights, and i find it disgusting and appalling!

How are we expected to have faith in the Justice system and trust the police?

RIP Ian Tomlinson.

Jul 22, 2010 1:06pm BST  --  Report as abuse
kimmyajc wrote:
Given hindsight we can all be critical of the officers actions. However put in the same position with the same training can everyone reading this article honestly say that they would know for definate they were not capable of committing the same act given the circumstances.

I do not defend the action taken merely the fact that people are quick to assume that this is the bahviour of most officers. (@ cynic1948)

Police officers do a job and as such recieve training to do that job properly, if you feel police are inadequately trained for the job that’s one thing but to assume the job atrracts are large number of thugs is baseless, it’s like saying the army attracts a high number of violent killers.

Granted some people do the job better than others but you need to avoid tarring everyone with the same brush.

Jul 22, 2010 2:07pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.