Government eyes temporary ban of "legal high" drugs

Related Topics

LONDON | Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:11am BST

LONDON (Reuters) - The coalition government said on Friday it will introduce temporary bans on legal drugs that could be harmful to users.

A proposed new law will allow authorities to react quickly as new substances emerge with 12-month bans while experts assess the drugs.

The move reflects public concern over the effects of "legal highs" such as the drug mephedrone which was banned in April.

"The drugs market is changing and we need to adapt current laws to allow us to act more quickly," Crime Prevention Minister James Brokenshire said in a statement.

"The temporary ban allows us to act straight away to stop new substances gaining a foothold in the market and help us tackle unscrupulous drug dealers trying to get round the law by peddling dangerous chemicals to young people," he said.

Under the planned legislation, authorities would be able to ban substances temporarily following an initial consideration by the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD).

The ACMD would then carry out a comprehensive review of the substance and advise whether it should be permanently banned.

Police would be able to confiscate suspect substances and the UK Border Agency could seize shipments entering the country.

The penalty for supplying a banned drug would be a maximum of 14 years in prison and an unlimited fine.

Possession of a temporarily banned substance for personal use would not be a criminal offence "to prevent the unnecessary criminalisation of young people," the government said.

Subject to parliamentary approval, the system of temporary bans is expected to be introduced by the end of next year.

(Reporting by Adrian Croft; Editing by)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
freddyf wrote:
If food additives and medicines must be tested before being put on sale then it makes sense that legal highs are too. The problem is that at the moment there is no provision for a “it’s safe” outcome after the year-long review of the drug. What if it came up safe? Would the government just let it be sold and not get involved further? Would they ban it anyway? Would they sack advisers until by attrition they were left with advisers who would say that the substance was unsafe? Or would we have some yet-to-be-defined regulated sale of the substance?

Aug 20, 2010 10:08am BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.