Government slashes spending and raises retirement age

Related Topics

Related Video

1 of 15. A still image from video shows Britain's Finance Minister George Osborne, flanked by Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, announcing the UK government's spending plans at parliament in London, October 20, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Parbul TV via Reuters TV

LONDON | Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:09pm BST

LONDON (Reuters) - The government will cut half a million jobs, lift the retirement age and slash welfare as part of an unprecedented cost-cutting drive announced Wednesday which will test the strength of the economy and the government.

The long-awaited spending review confirmed 80 billion pounds of cuts, sent unions into a fury and turned up the heat on the Liberal Democrats, the junior coalition partners who campaigned against such sharp fiscal tightening before the May election.

The jury remains out on whether the economy -- just recovering from the worst recession since World War Two -- can survive the squeeze which will cut growth by around half a percent each year. Analysts expect the Bank of England to keep monetary policy super-loose for the foreseeable future.

Nor is it clear whether the cuts -- aimed at bringing down a record budget deficit of 11 percent of GDP -- can actually be achieved. More of the burden has been shifted to the notoriously hard-to-cut welfare bill -- an extra 7 billion pounds on top of the 11 billion pounds cuts already announced.

Chancellor George Osborne said that was the best way and would mean that government departments outside protected areas like health and international aid would only see their budgets shrink by, on average, 19 percent, not the 25 percent announced in his budget.

"Tackling this budget deficit is unavoidable. The decisions about how we do it are not. There are choices. And today we make them," the 39-year-old who took office in May told parliament.

He said the state pension age for men and women will rise to 66 by 2020 and that 490,000 public sector jobs were likely to disappear over the next four years.

Conscious of public anger against banks widely blamed for the economic crisis, Osborne also said the financial sector will have to pay its fair share and legislation on a bank levy announced earlier this year will be published Thursday.

"Our aim will be to extract the maximum sustainable tax revenues from financial services," he said.

EUROPEAN AUSTERITY

Austerity drives across Europe have unleashed a wave of sometimes violent protests. In France, a million people have hit the streets to protest at the retirement age being raised to 62.

Unions in Portugal -- where a minority government is struggling to calm investors by getting an austerity budget through parliament -- have called a general strike for November 24 and Spain's government too has faced down protests to seek budget cuts.

"We should look ... to the kind of resistance being mobilised by the French trade unions, which enjoys overwhelming public support, as an example how to repel austerity cuts," said Bob Crow, head of the RMT rail union.

So far, British voters appear to be reconciled to the need for economies. The latest Reuters/Ipsos MORI political monitor Tuesday showed 38 percent of people believe the centre-right Conservatives have the best economic policies compared with a quarter who preferred the opposition Labour Party's stance.

But voters have yet to see the practical impact of the cuts, whether that means longer waiting times at hospitals, fewer police or less regular rubbish collections -- alongside hikes in national and local taxes.

"The average department will see a 19 percent reduction," said BNP Paribas economist Alan Clarke. "The consensus forecasts imply these will feel like a paper cut -- we believe reductions of this magnitude will feel more like an amputation."

Opinion polls suggest the LibDems, the left-leaning junior coalition partners, are already in trouble. The coalition's key message is that the cuts are fair but the Institute of Fiscal Studies has already branded the spending review "regressive" -- that is to say it will hit the poor hardest.

Markets took the review in their stride and credit rating agency Fitch said it confirmed Britain's AAA credit status.

But analysts say much will now depend on the strength of the recovery. Osborne is banking on a private sector recovery to make up for the cutbacks in the public sector.

"The Chancellor is making some rather heroic assumptions. Households may continue to save and pay down debt rather than spend, businesses may remain reluctant to invest and export performance could suffer from a lacklustre global recovery," said Andrew Smith, chief economist at KPMG.

"With indicators already suggesting that the economy is losing momentum and confidence likely to be damaged by just the announcement of cuts and job losses, further monetary easing may well be necessary to compensate for the fiscal tightening now in the pipeline."

(Editing by Mike Peacock/Ruth Pitchford)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
vandamme wrote:
38% support from the public for their economic policies compared to a quarter for Labour. It doesn’t look good for both and who should be surprised of that?

Oct 20, 2010 10:49am BST  --  Report as abuse
gbuck2010 wrote:
No matter what measures are put into place, the farce of British Government will continue.

Listening to Parliament broadcasts we hear adults still living in the culture of a public school debating society. Listening to the Governing chamber in other countries we hear a far more business-like atmosphere.

Considering the situation that is now being addressed we see that the situation has arisen through decades of poor Government. Unfortunately, unlike every other position in the UK, you do not have to show your competence at being suitable to be a Member of Parliament.

The British Parliament has made detrimental decisions which have led to the situation the UK now finds itself in. What decisions do I mean? The decisions are:

• The Thatcher Conservative Government deciding to turn the UK into a ‘service industry’ based economy. Apart from the City of London, the rest of the UK can not generate enough ‘turnover’ in this sector. This has therefore meant that Government income has not been sufficient to support the improvements expected of the commitments which the Government has.
• Unlike other countries, which have had the luxury of ‘North Sea’ oil, the UK has not suitably invested this ‘one off’ windfall to the benefit of the country.
• Similarly, the fact that the UK paid off its debts from the Second World War, has not been obvious in improvements to the areas facilitated by the Government or have alleviated the generation of greater Government debt.
• The ‘so called’ New Labour party followed in the footsteps of previous Labour Governance by leading the UK’s finances to the brink of IMF intervention.

Until the UK’s Government moves into the 21st Century and stops the two party ‘good cop/bad cop’ game and grows out of the ‘Public School’ debating society culture, the UK will continue to fail to make sustainable improvements which can be built upon year on year, no matter which ‘party’ is Governing the UK.

Oct 20, 2010 12:56pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Sir_Humphrey wrote:
460,000 public sector jobs to go. Its not enough. We could loose that number from Whitehall alone, and still have 120,000 ne’re do wells swaning around. Lets make the public sector accountable to the public.

Oct 20, 2010 2:04pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.