Jobless Britons could be made to do manual work

Related Topics

A protester adjusts his bib prior to the Lloyds Banking Group's annual general meeting (AGM) at the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre (SECC) in Glasgow, Scotland, June 5, 2009. REUTERS/David Moir

A protester adjusts his bib prior to the Lloyds Banking Group's annual general meeting (AGM) at the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre (SECC) in Glasgow, Scotland, June 5, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/David Moir

LONDON | Sun Nov 7, 2010 11:31am GMT

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's long-term unemployed could be forced to carry out compulsory manual work or risk losing their welfare benefits under plans being put forward by the government, newspapers reported on Sunday.

The U.S.-style scheme would see the long-term jobless ordered to take up four-week placements in order to get them used to having a full-time job.

The idea is part of major reforms, due to be unveiled this week, to make cuts to Britain's huge welfare bill, reduce dependency on benefits and weed out those earning money but not declaring it, papers said.

"What we are talking about here is people who have not been used to working having both the opportunity and perhaps a bit more of a push as well, to experience the workplace from time to time," Foreign Secretary William Hague told BBC TV.

"The vast majority of people in Britain will think that is the right thing to do."

Shortly after the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition took power in May, Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith unveiled plans to simplify the complex web of benefits available to reduce errors and inefficiencies.

Duncan Smith said the system had become regressive and was not giving people the right incentive to work as many were financially better off unemployed.

Under his plans separate benefits for items such as housing, income support or incapacity will be replaced by a "universal credit" system whereby individual households would get a single welfare payment to ensure those in work would be better off.

The Observer newspaper said that in return, long-term unemployed would be told to take up work placements of at least 30 hours a week for a four-week period.

If they refuse or fail to complete the programme, their jobseekers' allowance, worth 64.30 pounds a week for those over 25, could be stopped for at least three months.

GARDENING

Charities, local councils, voluntary organisations and private companies will be contracted to provide the placements, which could involve gardening, clearing up litter or painting schools, the Sunday Times reported.

"We will shortly be bringing forward further proposals on how to break the cycle of dependency blighting many of our communities and make sure work always pays," a spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said.

The proposals echo similar schemes in the United States, but do not go as far as the system there which limits the time people can claim benefits.

"The message will go across; play ball or it's going to be difficult," Duncan Smith told the Daily Telegraph on Saturday.

Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the opposition Labour Party, said they would wait for full details of the reforms before deciding whether to oppose the measures but added she believed some of the proposals were unfair.

"Without jobs, welfare reform won't work," she told BBC TV.

In 2009/10, the government spent 87 billion pounds on benefits and tax credits for people of working age, dwarfing most other items of government spending.

The government estimates that some 1.4 million people in Britain have been on out of work benefits for nine or more of the last 10 years.

(Editing by Jon Hemming)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
nobbynutsford wrote:
Please could someone tell me why if there is work for the unemployed to do on this scheme paying them a pittance,then why can’t this manual work be advertised as a proper job and let the unemployed apply for the job and be paid a proper wage to do it.
Perhaps because the government wants to cut the council workers doing these jobs and replace them with slave labour

Nov 07, 2010 10:59am GMT  --  Report as abuse
Andthen wrote:
Why private companies ?
A con from the Cons.
“The vast majority of people in Britain will think that is the right thing to do.”
If the government start to hear the “vast majority” then you can bring back hanging ,stop all immigration ,leave the E.U.,make the banks repay and stop giving bonuses for nothing and many other things,however only measures to hurt those who can’t strike back are in order under Mrs Thatchers next generation.

Nov 07, 2010 11:57am GMT  --  Report as abuse
kasiosag wrote:
I agree to the above but also we need to offer an alternative to where people can try the jobs without losing their benefits.

being on the dole is no laughing matter, it saps you confidence and after 6months and 30 interviews i was glad to come off it.

The UK is a dirty place, we have 1.47 million seeking job seekers allowances, lets make use of these people, lets clean UK up.

Look outside and there litter, go on the trains and there is graffiti.

Offer them a chance to get outside without penalties, but do not insult their intelligent and pride, explain why they are doing this, the benefits to the communities, if those who show merits then reward them, but lastly these people are not to be used for contract work or heavy labour this is 4 weeks work experience. Respect that.

Nov 07, 2010 12:11pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.