China's rare earths export cut spurs trade concerns

Related Topics

Quotes

   
A worker waters the site of a rare earth metals mine at Nancheng county, Jiangxi province December 29, 2010. REUTERS/Stringer CHINA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN CHINA

A worker waters the site of a rare earth metals mine at Nancheng county, Jiangxi province December 29, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer CHINA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN CHINA

SYDNEY | Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:30pm GMT

SYDNEY (Reuters) - China's move to slash export quotas on rare earth minerals -- vital in a slew of high-tech products -- has raised fresh international trade concerns, and Japan's Sony Corp vowed on Wednesday to reduce its reliance on the minerals.

China, which produces about 97 percent of the global supply of rare earth minerals, cut its export quotas by 35 percent for the first half of 2011 versus a year ago, saying it wanted to preserve ample reserves. It also cautioned that it has not decided on the quotas for the second half of the year.

The little-known class of 17 related elements is used in numerous electronic devices and clean energy technology.

A European Commission spokesman said the European Union "notes the latest quota figures and expects China to respect its recent assurance of a guarantee of rare earth supplies to Europe." The United States, which earlier this month threatened possible World Trade Organisation action over Chinese rare earth export restraints, voiced concern on Tuesday as well.

While Japanese giant Sony said China's move represented a hindrance to free trade, for other companies the Chinese action provided a boost.

Shares of Lynas Corp, which owns the world's richest known non-Chinese deposit of rare earth minerals, jumped more than 10 percent even though it will be at least a year before it is capable of mining any material from a new lode in Australia.

Other rare earth companies, including China Rare Earth Holding Ltd, Arafura Resources, Alkane Resources and Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd, also gained between 8 percent and 10 percent.

Shares in Colorado-based Molycorp closed Wednesday's session on the New York Stock Exchange up 6.76 percent at $49.30 (£31.80). That was its second-highest close ever and represented a nearly 400 percent jump from the company's initial public offering price of $14 in July.

Molycorp owns a rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, which is scheduled to resume production next year after a 10-year hiatus.

"Any reductions China makes in its 2011 exports versus 2010 levels will only exacerbate the global supply shortfall of rare earths we can expect in 2011," Molycorp CEO Mark Smith said in a statement.

U.S. makers of high-tech products such as Apple Inc's iPads and various Japanese companies have been scrambling to secure reliable supplies of the minerals outside of China as Beijing steadily reduces export allocations.

While Sony does not import or buy rare earth elements directly, the minerals are crucial for the production of components used in its finished products. These include magnets, condensers, and abrasives for polishing LCD glass, company spokeswoman Ayano Iguchi said.

SONY MULLS OPTIONS

Sony, maker of Bravia brand flat TVs, Vaio PCs and the PlayStation 3 videogame console, will look for ways to cut its use of rare earth elements, including developing alternative materials, Iguchi said.

"We cannot welcome rare earth export controls or any restrictions that hinder the system of free trade," Sony said in an e-mail statement in response to questions by Reuters.

"At this point in time there is no direct impact on our company. But further restrictions could lead to a shortage of supply or rise in costs for related parts and materials," Sony said. "We will watch the situation carefully."

Wind turbines and hybrid cars are among the biggest users of rare earth minerals, which analysts say are facing a global supply crunch as demand swells. The minerals also are used in some weapons systems.

"The growth in the Chinese domestic market coupled with a decrease in production of rare earths in China is a likely cause for the tightening of export regulations," Lynas Executive Chairman Nick Curtis said in a statement.

Lynas aims to start production in about a year and has already forged supply contracts with Japanese traders.

World demand for rare earth minerals at present is about 110,000 tonnes a year, with China accounting for about 75 percent of total demand with the remainder split between Japan, the United States and Europe, in descending order.

"With global demand outside of China expected to rise further to between 55,000 and 60,000 tonnes in 2011, the rare earth shortages we saw in 2010 are likely to occur again in 2011 and may be even more pronounced," Molycorp's Smith said.

Demand is set to more than double to 250,000 tonnes by 2015, according to industry estimates.

China's export quota cut for rare earth minerals for the first half of 2011 was initially reported on Tuesday as about 11 percent of quotas for the first half of 2010. But clarifications from China's government on Wednesday showed it was a 35 percent cut from the year-earlier period.

"Concerned parties should not estimate full-year quotas for rare earth minerals just by looking at the first set of quotas," China's Ministry of Commerce said.

Final quotas will take into account domestic production and demand both at home and abroad, according to the ministry.

Prices have surged for these minerals since authorities in Beijing slashed their rare earth exports by 40 percent this summer, saying China needed them for its economic development.

(Additional reporting by Nathan Layne and Kiyoshi Takenaka in Tokyo, Tom Miles and Niu Shuping in Beijing, Hyun Joo Jin and Ju-min Park in Seoul, Peter Harrison in Brussels and James Kelleher in Chicago; Editing by Will Dunham and Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
markjuliansmith wrote:
This act by China INC reinforces the justified concerns of the US and its allies (Rudd x Prime Minister Australia “military force may have to be used against China) particularly Japan (finding itself in a ‘severe’ situation regards its military capacity to counter China INCs military power in the area) regards China INCs ambitions.

China INC and its advocates say China INC is not in a position to challenge US supremacy – but it does not have to front on – this is why China INC is utilizing its pray book “Ultimate War” which necessarily avoids direct confrontation in the beginning – this carried out by various surrogates such as North Korea, Iran, Burma and other States causing the Democracies trouble as in the Sudan.

Also its doctrine underlines the diplomatic and economic war which needs to be carried out concurrently. Russia has been a particularly amiable bedfellow for China INC in this regard. The China INC and Russian reaction to the recent Korean crises underlines this relationship. One must say it is not going to be in Russia’s interests in the long term.

The question as to whether not an entity, being it an individual or a State is prone to violence is not the quality or quantity of weaponry as we see with the Islamic terrorism but the text upon which entity base their actions.

Sahr Johnny, Sierra Leone’s ambassador to Beijing “The Chinese just come and do it. They don’t start to hold meetings about environmental impact assessment, human rights, bad governance and good governance.”

Reflection on a statement made by the US Chamber of commerce to the US International Trade Commission in June 2010 “In effect rather than working to address the long-standing problems in its trade and investment sectors, China is using the weakness of its regulatory and enforcement regimes to provide greater competitive advantage to its companies.”

The fact is even apart from instituting draconian methods of controlling information internally and externally reflective of oppressive dictatorships we can see the text “Ultimate War” applauded in the highest levels of the China INC elite being represented in the above two statements.

What are we seeing? A complete disregard for other. Nothing is done to get in the way of obtaining a key element be it iron ore, gold, wheat, trade scientific or military secrets – human rights mean absolutely nothing to China INC.

China is expected to have a global force by 2050 which is relatively not that far away with the first battlegrounds the South China Sea and the Yellow sea as we can see being joined now.

If you had a world power or even a small power, whatever military means they had at their disposal, with the text “Ultimate War” in their right hand rather than the text “The United States Constitution” what would you expect over the short term let alone the long term?

Dec 30, 2010 10:02am GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.