Goldman traded $1.3 billion in Libyan funds - report

Related Topics

Quotes

   
A Goldman Sachs sign is seen above their booth on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, January 19, 2011. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

A Goldman Sachs sign is seen above their booth on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, January 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

Tue May 31, 2011 7:57am BST

(Reuters) - Goldman Sachs invested more than $1.3 billion (786.1 million pounds) from Libya's sovereign-wealth fund in currency bets and other trades in 2008 and the investment lost more than 98 percent of its value, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing internal Goldman documents.

When the fund, controlled by Col. Muammar Gaddafi, made huge losses Goldman offered Libya the chance to become one of its biggest shareholders, the Journal said, citing people familiar with the matter.

Goldman Sachs was not available for comment, outside of normal U.S. business hours.

Among the different proposals put forward by Goldman Sachs to recoup the losses was one in which Libya would get $5 billion in preferred Goldman shares in return for investing $3.7 billion into the securities firm, the paper added.

The documents also show that company Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein, its finance chief David Viniar and top executive Michael Sherwood were involved in discussions in this regard, the Journal reported.

The Libyan fund had apparently paid $1.3 billion for options on a basket of currencies and on six stocks - Citigroup Inc (C.N), Italian bank UniCredit SpA (CRDI.MI), Spanish bank Banco Santander, German insurance giant Allianz (ALVG.DE), French energy company Électricité de France (EDF.PA) and Italian energy company Eni SpA (ENI.MI), the paper said.

(Reporting by Rachel Chitra in Bangalore; Editing by David Cowell)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
pathan wrote:
If I was a shareholder, I’d be wondering why the Bank is expecting shareholders to take losses which were the result of incompetent trading. I’d be wondering whose interests Blankfein and co are protecting.

May 31, 2011 1:22pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Graham56 wrote:
What more evidence does the world need that Goldman Sachs is a global criminal enterprise that must be investigated, stopped and disbanded. Wherever there is financial mayhem their name is constantly associated with it.

Is it any surprise Col. Muammar Gaddafi finds himself in hot water after holding Goldman Sachs accountable? Remember, Goldman is one of the Federal Reserve’s private owners. The Fed holds US government debt. By inference this powerful global terror group has the ear of the US government that directs US military forces. Is it any wonder Gaddafi is out of favour. Conspiracy or coincidence?

Jun 01, 2011 4:14pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.