EU proposes 0.1 percent financial transaction tax

Related Topics

STRASBOURG, France | Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:48pm BST

STRASBOURG, France (Reuters) - The European Union's executive proposed a bloc-wide tax on financial transactions it said would raise 57 billion euros a year, but banks described the plan as nonsense and Britain said it would only support a global levy.

The EU's executive European Commission formally adopted on Wednesday plans for a financial transaction tax from January 2014, which will need unanimous approval from EU states and which it said it hoped the rest of the world will copy.

"With this proposal the European Union becomes a forerunner in the global implementation of a financial transaction tax," EU Tax Commissioner, Algirdas Semeta, said in a statement.

"Our project is sound and workable. I have no doubt this tax can deliver what EU citizens expect -- a fair contribution from the financial sector. I am confident that our partners in the G20 will see their interest in following this path."

Under the plan, stock and bond trades would be taxed at the rate of 0.1 percent, with derivatives at 0.01 percent.

The EU executive said the tax would be imposed on all transactions in financial instruments between financial firms when at least one party to the trade is based in the bloc.

Revenues would be divided between the EU's own budget to cut national contributions, with the rest going directly to member states.

The Group of 20 forum has tried and failed in the past year to agree on a global transaction tax as many countries fear it would be too easy for financial firms to evade.

Canada, Britain, the United States, Australia and China oppose the tax because it puts more of a burden on banks, while France, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Norway and Spain support it, along with several African states.

Britain, the EU's biggest financial centre, reiterated on Wednesday such a tax would only work globally.

"The government will continue to engage with its international partners on Financial Transaction Taxes and has no objection to them in principle. But any financial transaction tax would have to apply globally and there are a number of practical issues that need to be worked through," a UK Treasury spokesman said.

A transaction tax, dubbed a Tobin Tax after the U.S. economist who devised it in the 1970s, has periodically been mooted but yet to be broadly introduced because of fears it can be easily circumvented.

'NONSENSE'

Without Britain's backing, there may be an attempt to introduce the tax voluntarily among euro zone countries.

"The proposal would introduce new minimum tax rates and harmonise different existing taxes on financial transactions in the EU," the executive added.

Britain, for example, already imposes a small stamp duty tax on share trades and has also introduced a levy on bank balance sheets.

The European Banking Federation said the introduction of a transaction tax is a "nonsense" as it could shift business to elsewhere in the world.

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), another banking lobby, said many financial transactions are made on behalf of businesses who would bear the extra costs.

KPMG, a consultancy, said the additional reporting and compliance costs, as well as the IT systems needed to facilitate the tax, would be huge.

A European Commission impact study on the tax said there are strong risks of transactions relocating to countries not applying the levy.

With a tax rate of 0.1 percent, the Commission's models showed drops of up to 1.76 percent in gross domestic product in the long run.

(Reporting by Fiona Shaikh and Huw Jones in London and Francesco Guarascio in Strasbourg, France; Editing by John Stonestreet)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
SCSCSC wrote:
Tax, tax and more tax. Rather than get their house in order (i.e. get those 16 years of unaudited accounts sorted out) they propose yet another tax – and primarily on the UK. This is on top of a general budget increase that bears no resemblance to what is going on in the real world.

Yes, banks did mess up but the biggest mess up resides at the EU’s door. They allowed the poor quality debt EU sovereign to enter the system but seem unable to agree on anything.

I think that we are living in defining times and that we in Europe are throwing away our futures and those of our children too. The population of the EU deserve better than this nonsense.

Sep 28, 2011 1:33pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Marylyn wrote:
We already pay tax on share acquisition in the UK. It’s 0.5% and I support the UK government refusing this new onslaught.

If forced to accept this 0.1% the only acceptable outcome would be to set the UK stamp duty at 0.1%. Ideally it should be scrapped altogether.

Why on earth should investors be punished, no matter how slight, for supporting business and taking the risks entailed. Face it, we pay tax on dividends; tax on most things we spend it on, and possibly capital gains tax when selling. For all that, unlike cash savers, we have no compensation when things go wrong. How much more tax do they want?
Every time money changes hands the government(s) nick a slice of it.

Derivatives? Tax the punters when they lose!

Much more tax and it’ll be simpler to look on our incomes as small change we’re allowed to keep after HMRC have done all their worst.

Sep 28, 2011 1:39pm BST  --  Report as abuse
SCSCSC wrote:
Marylyn – I couldn’t agree more. More taxes will just push up the cost of doing business in the UK and the EU and may lead to other financial centres poaching business from us.

Do I have any confidence that this EU tax will be properly spent and accounted for? No.

We do need to resist this. I fear more and more protectionism and our EU ‘cousins’ looking after their own interests rather than behaving like a proper co-ordinated group of nations.

Sep 28, 2011 4:53pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.