BBC set to unveil deep cuts

LONDON Thu Oct 6, 2011 12:07am BST

A man talks on a mobile phone inside the BBC headquarters in London November 21, 2008. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

A man talks on a mobile phone inside the BBC headquarters in London November 21, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

Related Topics

Quotes

   

LONDON (Reuters) - The BBC is set to announce proposals for deep cuts to its programming and staff numbers Thursday as the publicly funded broadcaster prepares to implement savings imposed by the cash-strapped government.

The world's biggest broadcaster has to slash 20 percent of its annual 3.5 billion pound budget under a deal struck with the government a year ago as the country's deepest public spending cuts in decades were being planned.

With eight national TV channels, 50 radio stations and an extensive website, the BBC's size and resources have attracted envy and criticism from rivals, led by BSkyB, especially as advertising-funded rivals are hit hard by the recession.

Last year, the BBC agreed to freeze the annual licence fee of 145.50 pounds payable by every TV-owning household. It is also taking on extra costs from the government including funding BBC World Service radio, which is broadcast overseas.

The agreement between the Director General of the BBC and the government was hammered out in haste, stripping out the months of negotiation normally involved, as the coalition government scrambled to cut its spending after taking power.

"The BBC were in no position to argue, given the rhetoric about the state of the economy and the need for everyone to pull their horns in," says Steven Barnett, professor of communications at London's Westminster University.

The BBC towers over the nation's media landscape with a rich offering of drama, comedy and children's programming, a huge newsgathering operation and some of the most popular websites.

In a lecture two years ago, News Corp executive and BSkyB Chairman James Murdoch lashed out at the BBC, accusing it of making a land grab for power and calling for a radical overhaul of television regulation.

The pendulum has since swung back in favour of looser regulation more favourable to commercial rivals and lower public spending, especially since the recession and the installation of a centre-right coalition government in 2010.

Alex DeGroote, media analyst at London brokerage Panmure Gordon, said the slimming down of the BBC would help level the playing field in Britain, where commercial media companies were up against a far stronger public rival than their peers abroad.

"There's always been a BBC discount for commercial media in this country. It got particularly high in 2002-05. That's when you had a massive expansion of the BBC's inventory -- more digital radio, BBC3 and BBC4, lots of Internet sites," he said.

"Arguably, you had a sponsor government as well. Tony Blair's New Labour was in favour of expansion of the public sector. But slowly the roles have reversed."

(Editing by Louise Ireland)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
MrBeck wrote:
I recommend cutting anything to do with DAB. No one wants it. It’s expensive to implement. It’s expensive to operate both as the broadcaster and the listener and it’s outdated (DAB+ is the standard in Europe as much as an digital system is). Stick with FM. It’s established. It’s cheap to run for both the broadcaster and the listener and it operates just about everywhere.

Oct 05, 2011 1:28am BST  --  Report as abuse
MrBeck wrote:
I recommend cutting anything to do with DAB. No one wants it. It’s expensive to implement. It’s expensive to operate both as the broadcaster and the listener and it’s outdated (DAB+ is the standard in Europe as much as an digital system is). Stick with FM. It’s established. It’s cheap to run for both the broadcaster and the listener and it operates just about everywhere.

Oct 05, 2011 1:28am BST  --  Report as abuse
Marylyn wrote:
It’s pretty obvious that the TV license fee is simply another tax, only a portion of which goes to the BBC, otherwise we’d see a 20% reduction in the fee. Disgusting if you ask me. I’d love to know what portion actually does go to the BBC and should it be supplemented by money from other tax sources, how much. Governments should respect the fact that the BBC is the finest broadcaster in the world, a pinnacle that other broadcasters aim to reach. It has many innovations to its name.
We must not forget that the BBC is one of very few broadcasters in the world whose output is not interrupted by ads every few minutes, a feature I personally cherish.

Oct 05, 2011 2:11am BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.