Saudi Arabia doubts Iran oil blockade claim

Related Topics

TEHRAN | Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:39pm GMT

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia on Monday expressed doubts over Iran's claim it could block the main oil shipping route out of the Gulf and made clear it was ready to pump more oil after sanctions threatened to cut Iranian sales of crude.

Brent crude rose above $111 on concerns about global oil supplies if sanctions freeze OPEC's second biggest producer out of the market or push it towards military conflict, while Saudi Arabia said it would work to stabilise the price at $100.

Israel, which has often said it could strike Iran to stop it developing nuclear weapons, called for tough new sanctions against Tehran to stop its nuclear programme.

But it said that for sanctions to work effectively, all countries must join in - a subtle swipe at Russia and China which oppose the latest Western moves.

"Iran must be stopped and the good news is that Iran can be stopped with economic and diplomatic means once the entire international community gathers together with effective sanctions," Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told the BBC.

Tehran has been under a growing array of U.N. and unilateral sanctions for years, but a U.S. bill that President Barack Obama signed into law on New Year's Eve went far further than previously, aiming to stop countries paying for Iranian oil.

The European Union - Iran's second biggest oil customer after China, buying some 450,000 barrels per day of its 2.6 million bpd exports - is also expected to agree to embargo Iranian oil at a foreign ministers meeting on January 23.

The measures go far further than U.N. sanctions agreed by China and Russia and have helped cause a currency crisis in Iran where dollars are now a scarce commodity for Iranians seeking a safe haven for their vulnerable rial-denominated savings.

DANGEROUS

The new sanctions prompted Iran to threaten to close the Gulf to oil trade if it was prevented from selling its oil and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's senior military adviser reiterated Iran would act decisively to protect itself.

"Iran would use any tools to defend its national interests, if it was exposed to any dangers," Major-General Yahya Rahim-Safavi said, according to the semi-official Mehr news agency.

Israel - reputed to have the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal - said such talk was more evidence of the need to act quickly against Tehran.

"A nuclear Iran would mean a new world order where a very dangerous terroristic regime has impunity and also can control oil flow and oil prices," Ayalon said.

U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey is to make his first visit to Israel on Thursday. Israeli media say he will try to persuade his hosts not to "surprise" Washington on Iran.

Saudi Arabia, Iran's main rival for influence in the Middle East which would play a key role in replacing Iranian oil in he event of an embargo, played down Tehran's talk of closing the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping lane for Gulf exports.

"I personally do not believe that the Strait, if it were shut, will be shut for any length of time.

"I don't think all these pronouncements are helpful to the international oil market or to the price of oil. It's really disturbing."

"Our wish and hope is we can stabilise this oil price and keep it at a level around $100," Naimi said.

The leader of China, Iran's biggest oil customer was in Abu Dhabi on Monday, on a six-day tour of the region where he hopes for greater access to its huge oil and gas reserves.

Although Beijing opposes further international sanctions on Iran, it has already cut its purchases of Iranian oil by more than half for the first two months of this year.

A senior Iranian oil official denied reports that Iran's exports to Asia were already suffering due to the intensified sanctions pressure, saying contracts were bring renewed on schedule.

In addition to the confrontation with the United States over sanctions, Iran has accused it of being behind the latest murder of a nuclear scientist, blown up by a bomb attached to his car last in Tehran week, a charge Washington denies.

Parliament speaker Ali Larijani said "some people have been arrested" in connection with the assassination, the fifth such killing in the last two years.

Larijani gave no further details but told state-run Arabic language al Alam TV Tehran was ready to deal with sanctions.

"We are prepared for oil sanctions and have different scenarios, but we would not announce them in order to avoid alerting our enemies," he said.

(Additional reporting by Peter Griffiths in London; Writing by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Giles Elgood)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Wvandamme wrote:
In some western media I was told this embargo could only last maximum 2 months when EU, US and Saudi reserves are running out. And this isn’t the first time western bullies talk about an oil embargo against Iran. They also should consider that introducing a trade embargo is under international law an act of war.

Jan 16, 2012 11:19am GMT  --  Report as abuse
Spinner wrote:
More indignant rhetoric from the brave warriors in Tehran.

One would have thought that by now, these gladiators would have had the message that not too many nations are worried about the tough talk. In fact, Tehran may even have noticed that the more they sprout the rhetoric, the more the international community is tightening the screws.

Iran has two very simple choices. Firstly; continue along the road of aggressive words, and get thoroughly whipped, or secondly, just shut up, take what is coming, and get whipped.

Of course, there is a third option, but apparently the message cannot be translated into Farsi.

Open the nation’s nuclear facilities to IAEA inspectors (there could be no secrets not already well known to the inspectors), and all the nation’s troubles would go away.

Of course, the real troubles of the little dictator and his extremist cleric backers would only then begin.

Jan 16, 2012 11:27am GMT  --  Report as abuse
Wvandamme wrote:
Iran could by a push on a button destroy all the main Saudi oil installations. Everyone knows that. Blocking the Straits of Hormuz is not the main danger, destroying installations is. Therefore every effort should be made to stop this US and Israeli led escalation. Already I and all others in the world are paying for this warmongering.

Jan 16, 2012 4:43pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.