Bankers' pay needs to be "corrected" - RBS chairman

Related Topics

Quotes

   
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) Chairman Sir Philip Hampton rides an escalator before the start of the the company's annual general meeting in Edinburgh, Scotland April 28, 2010. REUTERS/David Moir

Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) Chairman Sir Philip Hampton rides an escalator before the start of the the company's annual general meeting in Edinburgh, Scotland April 28, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/David Moir

LONDON | Fri Feb 3, 2012 10:22pm GMT

LONDON (Reuters) - Pay in the banking industry has been high for too long and needs to be "corrected," the chairman of state-backed Royal Bank of Scotland told BBC Radio on Friday.

"Pay has been high for too long ... particularly in the banks, particularly in the investment banks, shareholders have done pretty badly and employees have done pretty well certainly over the last 10 years," said RBS Chairman Philip Hampton.

"That needs to be corrected. It actually isn't a society or fairness issue, it's a straightforward business issue. Too much of the money has not been going to the right place," he added.

Last month, Hampton and RBS Chief Executive Stephen Hester gave up their million pound bonus packages following intense public anger over the awards, with politicians from all major parties calling on them to decline the payments.

Hampton said RBS had underestimated the scale of the public outcry over the bonuses, but added that, compared to many other banks and businesses, salaries at RBS were not that high in relative terms.

RBS is 83-percent owned by the government after a taxpayer backed bailout during the 2008 credit crisis.

Hampton also denied media reports that the RBS board had threatened to resign as a result of the bonus payment row.

"That threat was never raised," he said.

(Reporting by Sudip Kar-Gupta; Editing by Michael Holden)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
About-Face wrote:
What took him so long?The Board threatened to resign? I say, sack the Board and find more able and honest Directors that stop the back scratching!

Feb 03, 2012 9:35am GMT  --  Report as abuse
Herby wrote:
He is right regards who gets the biggest payouts, a CEO for example will get £10 million salary and bonus but an individual from the banks investment arm will get £50 million for the same year, it is obscene and the excuse used to be it was based purely on performance, yet when I look at the FTSE 100 it is lower than it was 10 years ago as is my pension, as are all the banking shares whether public or not.

Feb 03, 2012 10:44am GMT  --  Report as abuse
dlefcoe wrote:
Having been in banking for a dozen years i can corroborate that a large proportion of staff have been grossly overpaid over the past dozen years at least and continue to do so.

However, this is not a problem restricted to the banking sector alone. It is widespread across the corporate industry. This will continue to be the case since the average person is forced by government to invest in pension funds who remove the decision making vote.

The public vote against excessive pay awards is 85% (according to recent polls), yet the actual vote from the remuneration committees do not reflect this.

The system is broken: The shareholders vote (the person in the street who has deposited money with a pension fund or other manager) does not pass through the system correctly. Until this is fixed, excessive pay will continue !

It will be a long time (approximately 10 years) until this is fixed, if at all because of government. Until that time, i intend to make use of this and take even more unjustified money from the weak and needy. Sorry !!!

Feb 03, 2012 1:08pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.