Cameron says could privatise some UK roads

Related Topics

Traffic queues on the M6 motorway near Manchester, northern England March 19, 2012. Britain is to examine the potential for privatising parts of its road network as it looks at ways of upgrading the nation's infrastructure, Prime Minister David Cameron said on Monday. REUTERS/Phil Noble

Traffic queues on the M6 motorway near Manchester, northern England March 19, 2012. Britain is to examine the potential for privatising parts of its road network as it looks at ways of upgrading the nation's infrastructure, Prime Minister David Cameron said on Monday.

Credit: Reuters/Phil Noble

LONDON | Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:15pm GMT

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's cash-strapped government could lease chunks of its road network to the private sector as Prime Minister David Cameron seeks to improve the country's infrastructure to stop it falling further behind its competitors.

The move to seek help from sovereign wealth funds and private investors came after news Cameron had only managed to secure two billion pounds from pension funds for new projects by 2013 - far short of a 20 billion pound target.

"The truth is, we are falling behind, falling behind our competitors," Cameron told an audience of engineers in London.

"There is now an urgent need to repair the decades-long degradation of our national infrastructure ... We need to look urgently at the options for getting large-scale private investment into the national roads network - from sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, and other investors."

Cameron said his Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government, due to publish its 2012 budget and economic updates on Wednesday, would look at introducing more tolling on new roads.

Britain has only one toll on a major highway, the 27-mile M6 toll Birmingham relief road.

Despite the lower-than-projected use of that road, analysts and some investors said the possibility of introducing more tolls could prove attractive.

"They are slightly more risky, compared to say a regulated utility or contracted power station - they are more economically sensitive," said Surinder Toor, European head of infrastructure at JPMorgan Asset Management.

"But this is core infrastructure, and we would be interested in schemes involving the existing road networks."

"DEAD END POLICY"

However, critics said expanding Britain's road network with private cash would not solve congestion problems and could drive up costs for motorists.

"Building and widening roads to tackle congestion is a dead-end policy that will simply lead to more traffic, more pollution and even more gridlocked roads," said Andrew Pendleton, Friends of the Earth's head of campaigns.

"The prime minister should be promoting alternatives to driving such as affordable buses and trains - and reduce our transport system's reliance on expensive overseas oil."

The changes to how Britain's roads are managed could mimic those made to water supply, where private sector capital funds independently regulated firms.

A government investigation into the idea will report in the autumn after examining several options, including the possibility of using road taxes to help fund private investment.

Last November, Britain announced plans to invest 30 billion pounds in major construction projects over the next few years, with two-thirds of the money set to come from pension funds.

The government is pushing through austerity measures to reduce a record peacetime public deficit, and Cameron admitted there was not enough money for further widescale, publicly funded road improvements.

The Conservative party, which Cameron leads, privatised the country's rail network in the 1990s, and has advocated a greater role for the private sector in the National Health Service as well as in schools.

(Additional reporting by Sinead Cruise; Editing by Steve Addison)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
voluntaryist72 wrote:
selling the roads? great idea, best this government has had ever! I trust I can expect a reduction in RFL (Road Fund License) & tax on fuel as well? no? oh well had to ask.

the problem with this move is simply this, government is crap at getting the best value for money & as such even when we will no longer pay for these roads via taxation do not expect the tax take to go down, if anything it will probably go up!

this should be the first step to a better way to offer ‘public services” sell them all, every damn thing, roads, schools, nhs, council services, police, fire, everything! I am pretty sure I could get my bins emptied, my kids educated, my security taken care of & my health care, for a lot less than me & mine have to pay to government.

PEACE, but not to statism, corporatism & hierarchism
“No service should be provided out the barrel of a gun. This is not freedom, it is tyranny”
voluntary-exchanges-only.blogspot.com
vforvoluntary.com ~ http://www.voluntaryist.com
freedomainradio.com

Mar 19, 2012 7:00am GMT  --  Report as abuse
ektope wrote:
All this privatisation will eventually lead to the collapse of the capitalist system .

Mar 19, 2012 10:46am GMT  --  Report as abuse
MobiusPizza wrote:
Cash strapped? UK government is spending close to 32 billion (which will undoubtdly overrun to 50b) on high speed rail project which has a projected payback time of 60 years, that’s ROI of < 2%. I know someone in charge of the business case working for consultation for the government, he has not even been on a train before (seriously).

The government needs to spend more money on the existing rail network, expand capacity, make it more affordable (UK has most expensive train service in Europe), that is much, much, much more effective than spending money on expanding road infrastructure and vanity projects like HS2.

Mar 19, 2012 3:45pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.