London win eases Cameron's vote setback

LONDON Sat May 5, 2012 12:59am BST

1 of 5. Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron walks from a polling station after voting in local elections with his wife Samantha (R) in central London May 3, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Peter Macdiarmid

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Boris Johnson dodged a humiliating nationwide defeat for Prime Minister David Cameron by winning London in local elections that saw voters angry at Britain's economic woes flock to opposition Labour and a right-wing anti-European fringe party.

Maverick mayor Johnson's silver-lining win in London was the only good news for Cameron whom local media said had been given a bloody nose by voters upset at spending cuts and Britain's return to recession.

Even Johnson, who as one of the most popular politicians in Cameron's own party is tipped as a possible future prime minister, saw his majority slashed, claiming victory only after a lengthy count that had put him head to head with his rival, Labour candidate Ken Livingstone.

"I will continue to fight for a good deal for Londoners, a good deal from the government that will help us deliver prosperity for everybody in this city," Johnson, famous for his ruffled fair hair, said after the vote count at London's City Hall, a rounded glass building on the Thames.

Johnson failed to mention the wider Conservative defeat, but his challenger, Livingstone, said that the victory could put Johnson on course to one day lead the Conservative party.

With results declared in all 181 councils being contested across the country, Labour had gained 823 new councillors while the Conservatives had lost 405 and their Liberal Democrat coalition partners were down by 336.

After preaching economic prudence, Cameron's coalition government was damaged by a return to recession and weeks of blunders that made ministers appear out of touch with voters struggling with high unemployment, price rises and low wages.

Cameron apologised to Conservative candidates who lost their jobs, blaming the defeat on the tough decisions he had been forced to make to reduce Britain's debt mountain and mend the $2.5 trillion (1.54 trillion pounds) economy.

"There aren't easy answers," said Cameron, whose party lost seats to Labour in the rural constituency he represents in parliament.

'WAKE UP CALL'

Labour said the results were a wake-up call for the government to soften its flagship deficit-cutting agenda.

"People are hurting, people are suffering from the recession, people are suffering from a government that has raised taxes for them and cut taxes for millionaires," said Ed Miliband, leader of centre-left Labour.

For Miliband, who has been under constant fire since he took over the Labour Party in 2010, the vote was a rare victory - with the exception of London - though he was pelted with an egg during a celebratory walk through Southampton.

The government's drubbing increased pressure on Cameron from within his own party to shift his electoral strategy to the right, a step Cameron's supporters say would be electoral suicide and sour his relations with his coalition partners, the centre-left Liberal Democrats.

"David Cameron is fighting to run a government with one hand tied behind his back because we are attached to wishy-washy Liberals and of course what Liberals are good for is opposition but they are absolutely useless in government," Conservative lawmaker Peter Bone told the BBC.

"ARROGANT POSH BOYS"

Derided as "arrogant posh boys who don't know the price of milk" by a Conservative rebel, Cameron and his finance minister George Osborne have struggled with a view that they are out of touch. This was reinforced by a row about the so-called "pasty tax", a sales-tax rise that pushed up the price of pasties, a cheap and popular snack.

Foreign Secretary William Hague sought to play down the scale of the Conservatives' defeat, saying it was "perfectly common" for governments to suffer losses at mid-term local elections. A national vote will be held in 2015.

UKIP, which stands for UK Independence Party, was contesting only a fraction of the total seats up for grabs but where it did field candidates, it averaged a record 14 percent of the vote.

This translated into just nine councillors because UKIP's support is geographically scattered, which makes it hard for the party to win any individual ward.

However, UKIP's surge was a clear threat to the Conservatives, who need to increase their popular support before the next national election.

"What they're scared of is that this trickle of support that has come to UKIP could turn into a flood," UKIP leader Nigel Farage told Reuters on Friday.

Philip Davies, a Conservative member of parliament, told Reuters there was no doubt that UKIP was taking votes from the Conservatives and that it was "a massive threat".

"They will undoubtedly stop us from winning seats that we would otherwise win (in 2015), and given how difficult it is for us to win an overall majority, every seat counts," he said.

At the last national parliamentary election, in 2010, the Conservatives fell short of an overall majority even though Labour were unpopular after 13 years in power. Cameron was forced to form an uneasy coalition with the Liberal Democrats.

"A MACHINE THAT'S NOT WORKING"

Vociferous right-wingers within the Conservative Party have always maintained that Cameron should have done more to appeal to the party's traditional supporters by attacking the European Union and talking tough on crime and immigration.

"So far he's tended to treat his party like a general, a field-marshal. But he has to realise it's not his party and listen to other voices in the party," influential online Conservative activist Tim Montgomerie told Reuters.

"Until he shows he's an electoral success, he won't command loyalty. The Conservative Party is an election-winning machine and right now it's a machine that's not working."

Cameron's cherished policy of strengthening local democracy by introducing elected mayors also suffered a setback. Voters in eight cities voted against having a directly elected mayor, with only Bristol voting in favour.

The picture was equally bleak for the Liberal Democrats, whose support has collapsed since they went into government. The local election results in England were the worst in their history.

In one area of Edinburgh, the Liberal Democrats won fewer votes than a climate activist wearing a penguin suit calling himself Professor Pongoo.

Labour, which had struggled to capitalise on the coalition's problems, captured 38 percent of the national vote versus 31 percent for the Conservatives and 16 percent for the Lib Dems. Voters turnout was low at just 32 percent.

(Additional reporting by Matt Falloon, Mohammed Abbas, Adrian Croft, and Estelle Shirbon; Writing by Guy Faulconbridge and Estelle Shirbon; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
Somewhat wrote:
Grim news indeed if Boris Johnson has been reduced to peddling his bicycle. Chapel Street,Portobello,Petticoat Lane? Has it come to this?

May 04, 2012 6:17am BST  --  Report as abuse
Herby wrote:
Maybe the people in the UK are tired of hearing a bunch of jumped up posh boys telling them how they need to behave and telling them every minute that the reason they are all moaning is because of what Labour did previously.

The Austerity whether nice or not is needed, only with a little bit more emphasis on jobs, and Osborne, even though one of the posh boys is actually pretty much on the ball, pardon the pun but I don’t think Ed Balls is on the ball.

Labour had to bail out the banks, Lehman Brothers did not collapse because of Labour, if Gordon and Alistair had not steered the way they did then we would be in much bigger trouble.

The Tory party has a serious problem, ‘COMMUNICATION’ you see they may be able to pander and communicate to the upper classes but unfortunately for them, as is being born out today in the elections, the classes they appeal to are the minority and so they are in trouble. Andy Coulson was key to the Tory government, Cameron knew he and his mates could not get their message across to the Majority, but he could do a lot better with the help of Coulson who could communicate the Tory policies in a more down to earth and human way. However, Coulson is gone and so with it any credibility or ‘Human connection’ with the masses. To top this off, if Coulson is charged with any criminal offences related to his editorial leadership at the New of the World then Cameroon will have to resign.

As for Liberals, how we were all duped into believing another posh boy in the guise of Clegg could actually care a less about the ‘People’, even Vince has succumbed to the ‘Power’ and rollercoaster of government, and as I wrote here 2 years ago, this coalition spell will put the Liberals 30 years back, they have crashed and burned. Nobody can believe a word a Liberal ever dribbles out now, many of those duped were young students, so the damage will last for decades. Talking of Clegg, has anyone seen him? he seems to have disappeared for the last year?

As for the other posh boy ‘Boris’, well he is a little different, he is posh in such a way that he says it how it is, even if you hate posh boys, you may succumb to the charm of Boris, he has a plan though, a strategy, the long game, and it may well pay off in the not too distant future Prime Minister Johnson.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/camerons-cronies-in-the-bullingdon-class-of-87-7183812.html

By plebian 4th May 2012

May 04, 2012 10:30am BST  --  Report as abuse
ActionDan wrote:
@Herby
Labour did indeed have to bail out the banks, because they’d let them get away with profligate lending for years and years. They were totally out-smarted by the banks though, and in the end Labour handed them piles of the nation’s wealth on top of what they’d creamed off during the boom years (which were gifted to them courtesy of the BoE keeping interest rates too low), and extracted practically no meaningful concessions out of them in return. Sweden on the other hand bailed out their banks, but extracted a “Pound of Flesh” in return.

Labour have bankrupted the country every time they’ve been in power, and the last time was no exception.

Early on, I had high hopes for the Conservative / LibDem coalition, but the Conservatives have shown themselves to be tied too closely with the interests of big business and the USA. I have to admit, I’m almost swinging in favour of UKIP, but I still perceive them to be somewhat eccentric.

May 04, 2012 12:45pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.