Environment agency backs fracking, nuclear power

LONDON Tue May 8, 2012 12:25pm BST

A car passes the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site near Seascale in Cumbria, England in this April 12, 2011 file photograph. REUTERS/David Moir/Files

A car passes the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing site near Seascale in Cumbria, England in this April 12, 2011 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/David Moir/Files

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - The chairman of the environment agency for England and Wales voiced support for shale gas extraction - which critics say can pollute ground water and cause earth tremors - and he backed government plans to expand nuclear power generation.

Shale gas is extracted using a technology called hydraulic fracturing or fracking, which involves pumping large amounts of water and chemicals underground.

The chairman, Lord Smith of Finsbury, said on Tuesday fracking could be done safely and that the technology could improve Britain's energy security and end the need to import gas from abroad.

The Environment Agency is largely government funded and is the main environmental regulator for England and Wales, including areas important for the shale gas and nuclear power sector, such as air and land pollution and waste regulation.

"Domestically available (shale) gas supply would be beneficial for our energy needs and our energy security and it could be affordable," Smith said on BBC Radio 4.

"However, we would want to monitor and regulate that process very rigorously," he added.

The technology has been blamed for causing slight earthquakes and been banned in several countries, but it has also transformed the U.S. energy sector and caused domestic energy prices there to plummet in recent years.

Smith said that fracking should only be developed if carbon capture and storage (CCS) methods were also available to make gas more environmentally friendly.

The UK plans to develop CCS technology to bury carbon dioxide emissions from its coal and gas power plants underground, but the technology is not commercially proven yet.

"If we end up going for a dash for gas in a few years time, which I suspect we may do, we have to have carbon capture and storage for gas fired power stations to capture the carbon rather than just releasing it," Smith said.

Smith also said that Britain needed nuclear power to combat climate change, although he doubted that the technology would play as great a role as the government wants it to.

"Building nuclear power stations is a long and difficult process and that means that 40 percent (of the power generation mix) is probably going to be difficult, but I would say that nuclear has to be part of the overall landscape," he said.

"Twenty years ago I would have said 'over my dead body' for nuclear power, now climate change has made a realist of many of us and I have to say it has to be part of the mix."

The agency is a statutory consultee on local government planning matters and failure to comply with its regulations can lead to criminal prosecution.

(Reporting by Henning Gloystein; Editing by Anthony Barker)

FILED UNDER: