BREAKINGVIEWS-Investors in India’s Reliance need more to rely on

Wed Jun 6, 2012 10:52am BST

Quotes

   

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

By Jeff Glekin

MUMBAI, June 6 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Reliance Industries (RELI.NS) is underperforming. Yet the hydrocarbon-rich conglomerate, which is controlled by Mukesh Ambani, India’s richest man, also has a cash mountain of $13.8 billon which it does not seem to know how to spend.

As returns have dwindled from core businesses, the proportion of profits from its treasury operations has surged. They accounted for as much as 42 percent of the total in the March quarter, roughly triple last year’s share. Reliance is now generating more profit from cash management than from exploration, and the contribution is almost equal to gains from refining. It’s nice to have such an efficient treasury, but it raises big questions about the sustainability of the overall Reliance business model.

Reliance posted its second consecutive quarter of declining profits in April, as refining margins fell and the firm struggled to boost production at the natural gasfield it co-owns with BP. Net profit for the three months to March fell 21 percent. Even so, Reliance generates up to $1 billion in free cash every quarter. The pile is three times what it was two years ago, and is now equivalent to around 40 percent of the company’s net worth.

Its shares, meanwhile, have lost 18 percent since February 2012, compared to an 8.6 percent fall in the benchmark SENSEX index.

Last year, Ambani outlined a big drive into consumer-focused businesses. But its retail business is loss-making even after six years. Investors must be worried about the billions spent getting into a fiercely competitive and unpredictable telecoms sector. A sizeable new investment in the energy sector might reassure. And perhaps the slow progress on the share buyback suggests something is cooking. But if management does not have firm plans to spend the spare money, the pressure to return more cash to shareholders will increase. In January, Reliance announced a $2.1 billion share buyback. So far less than a quarter of that sum has been spent. Reliance’s dividend yield of 1.2 percent is below the SENSEX average of 1.8 percent. Rather than allowing the AGM on June 7 to turn into the usual cakewalk, investors should make their voices heard. Reliance shareholders are in need of commercial and financial refreshment.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SIGN UP FOR BREAKINGVIEWS EMAIL ALERTS:

www.breakingviews.com/TOPNewsSubscription

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

CONTEXT NEWS

- Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries will hold its annual general meeting on June 7. Reliance generates up to $1 billion in free cash every quarter and held $13.8 billion at end-March.

- The company has so far acquired less than a quarter of the $2.1 billion of shares it plans to buy back from investors. Its return on capital slipped to 11.4 percent in quarter ending March 31 this year from 13.8 percent two years ago, Reuters reported on June 5.

- Last month, Reliance raised $2 billion in a 13-year loan, taking its debt raisings in the last four months to nearly $4 billion and increasing its gross debt to $15.4 billion. It is seeking another $1 billion loan for capital spending, sources told Thomson Reuters publication Basis Point.

- Reuters: Cash piles up at India's Reliance; growth cycle slowing? [ID:nL4E8G7ARJ]

RELATED COLUMNS

Blues brothers [ID:nL3E8CH2RB]

- For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on [GLEKIN/]

(Editing by Robert Cole and Katrina Hamlin)

((jeff.glekin@thomsonreuters.com)) Keywords: BREAKINGVIEWS RELIANCE

(C) Reuters 2012. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing, or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.