Rebekah Brooks told Cameron "we're in this together"

LONDON Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:47pm BST

1 of 4. Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves the Leveson Inquiry at the High Court in London June 14, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Related News

Related Topics



LONDON (Reuters) - Rebekah Brooks told David Cameron the night before a crucial political speech in 2009 that they were "professionally in this together", the Leveson Inquiry revealed on Thursday, embarrassing the man who now governs Britain.

A text message to Cameron, then in opposition, from Rebekah Brooks, then the head of Murdoch's British newspapers, was read out to the prime minister on live television during a grilling about his ties to the tycoon's News Corp.

"I am so rooting for you tomorrow not just as a personal friend but because professionally we're definitely in this together. Speech of your life? Yes he Cam!" Brooks told Cameron in that message the night before his speech to the Conservative Party's annual conference.

Testifying under oath at the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics, Cameron said Brooks had merely meant that they had a common interest because her Sun newspaper had come out in support of the Conservative Party ahead of the 2010 election.

But the message makes excruciating reading for Cameron as "We're all in this together" was the Conservatives' campaign slogan for that election. It was meant to present the party as inclusive and caring, but the Brooks message instead reinforces the perception of a party in thrall to a powerful media clique.

"Yes he Cam" was the Sun's headline the day after he made the 2009 speech, suggesting Brooks had decided how the newspaper would react to the speech before it was made.

Brooks quit her News Corp job last year over phone-hacking by reporters on her watch and has since been charged with perverting the course of justice for allegedly hiding evidence.


Cameron ordered the Leveson Inquiry last year at a time when he was under pressure to crack down on Murdoch's papers because of the revelation that reporters at the News of the World tabloid had hacked into the phone of a murdered schoolgirl.

But if Cameron had hoped the inquiry might neuter the hacking scandal, it has done the opposite by producing evidence that has raised doubts about his own judgment and caused a rift with his Liberal Democrat coalition partners.

These problems have absorbed his time and energy at a time when he is also grappling with a recession, unpopular public spending cuts and the euro zone crisis. On Thursday, he spent five hours answering questions at Leveson.

The inquiry has shown generations of politicians from both of Britain's main parties, Labour and the Conservatives, have fawned over Murdoch and people close to him.

Cameron used to sign his frequent text messages to Brooks with an affectionate "LOL", which he thought stood for "lots of love", according to Brooks's own testimony at Leveson, but his two Labour predecessors courted her just as assiduously.

Tony Blair had several private dinners with her and sent her friendly text messages, while during Gordon Brown's time as prime minister, his wife Sarah invited Brooks to "sleepover parties" at Brown's official weekend retreat.

Cameron repeatedly pointed the finger at Labour during his testimony. He dismissed as a "conspiracy theory" an accusation by Brown that the Conservatives had discreetly championed Murdoch's interests in return for support from his newspapers.

"Not only was there no covert deal, there was no overt deal, and there wasn't 'nods and winks'," Cameron said, jabbing his hand forward to emphasise the point.

He rejected the suggestion that while there may have been no explicit deal, there was an unspoken and mutually beneficial agreement between his party and the Murdoch press.

"We do slightly get into sort of witchcraft trials. How do you possibly prove that you're innocent on that basis?" he said.


Cameron spoke fluently but looked tense at the inquiry. He frowned in concentration as he listened to questions from lawyer Robert Jay, in contrast to his usually relaxed manner.

But his efforts were undermined when Jay read out the 2009 text message from Brooks, which referred to a problem Cameron had at the time with another Murdoch paper and suggested that he and Brooks should discuss the matter "over country supper".

The phrase is embarrassing for Cameron, who used to socialise with Brooks and other rich and powerful people connected to Murdoch during weekends at their respective mansions in a picturesque corner of the Oxfordshire countryside.

Cameron squirmed as Jay pressed him to say how often he used to meet up with Brooks in the country.

"Not every weekend ... I'd have to check. I might be able to go back and check. But I don't think every weekend. I don't think most weekends. But it would depend."

For British voters, talk of meetings "over country supper" only reinforces Cameron's image as a man of wealth and privilege who has little understanding of ordinary people's lives - an image he has tried hard to counteract, downplaying his elite upbringing at Eton, an expensive boarding school.

(Writing by Estelle Shirbon, additional reporting by Georgina Prodhan, Mike Holden, Philip Baillie, Li-Mei Hoang; Editing by Giles Elgood)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
Wvandamme wrote:
Any serious politician would have resigbned at least a year ago but he stays on. The UK democracy is a sick joke called Murdocracy. It’s rotten at the heart. Even Iran is more democratic.

Jun 14, 2012 4:47pm BST  --  Report as abuse
antipyramid wrote:
At another site 88.8% of thosse voting affirmed Hunt should go.
“Cam” prefers to ignore Hunt’s farcical ignorance of the most fundamental requirements of the Rule of Law relating to Quasi Judicial matters. Lord Bingham’s small and easily understood work “The Rule of Law” makes the matter very clear, that is, how Ministers must behave.
Even an Upper Class twit could follow it.Cam demonstrates his superiority at PMQ using a rubber cudgel with which to fend off and evade his answers. It’s pathetic. His appearance before long suffering Leveson showe that Cam suffers from a clinical degree of memory loss.Waterloo may have been won on the playing fields of Eton in the 19th Century, but Eton but the Players of those days were astute men. Wikepedia makes it clear that Cam’s background renders him unfit to govern a payday loan company. He is a boor, a charlatan, and a loser.
Yet this is our leader for the current economic battle, which, if lost, will negate all that Brits saved in 1940. Perhaps we will be better off governed by Germany, as increasingly seems likely.

Jun 15, 2012 9:35am BST  --  Report as abuse
antipyramid wrote:
Indeed, Wvandamme, except Murdoch has washed his hands of us following the Ministerial Pantomine’s failure.

Jun 15, 2012 9:39am BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.