Circumcision ban makes Germany "laughing stock" - Merkel

BERLIN Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:24pm BST

German Chancellor Angela Merkel visits the tsunami early warning center of Indonesia's Meteorology and Geophysics Agency in Jakarta July 11, 2012. REUTERS/Supri

German Chancellor Angela Merkel visits the tsunami early warning center of Indonesia's Meteorology and Geophysics Agency in Jakarta July 11, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Supri

Related Topics

BERLIN (Reuters) - Chancellor Angela Merkel has warned that Germany could become a laughing stock if it fails to overturn a district court ban on circumcision that has enraged Jews and Muslims.

Merkel's government has already criticised the Cologne court ruling and promised a new law to protect the right to circumcise male infants, but the conservative leader's strong comments underline how sensitive Germany is to charges of intolerance because of its Nazi past.

"I do not want Germany to be the only country in the world where Jews cannot practise their rituals. Otherwise we will become a laughing stock," the Bild daily quoted Merkel as telling a closed meeting of her Christian Democrats (CDU).

Joerg van Essen, parliamentary floor leader of Merkel's junior coalition partner the Free Democrats, told the Financial Times Deutschland newspaper that the new law would be introduced in the autumn.

The Cologne court, ruling in the case of a Muslim boy who suffered bleeding after circumcision, said the practice inflicts bodily harm and should not be carried out on young boys but could be practised on older males who give consent.

This is not acceptable under Jewish religious practice which requires boys to be circumcised from eight days old, nor for many Muslims, for whom the age of circumcision varies according to family, country and branch of Islam.

Jewish and Muslim groups have branded the court ruling an attack on their religious freedom and Jewish leaders say it could even threaten the continued existence of their community in Germany - a disturbing claim for a country still haunted by the Nazis' murder of six million European Jews in the Holocaust.

But the court ruling has drawn support from some, including Britain's Secular Medical Forum which has written to Merkel urging her to resist pressure to make non-consensual circumcision lawful.

"EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL"

"We are shocked that religious groups deny the harm (caused by circumcision) and at the distorted and disingenuous claims made by those opposing the court's decision, wrongly suggesting that it is an indication of anti-Semitism," the chairman of the Secular Medical Forum, Dr. Antony Lempert, said in the letter.

"We urge you not to let such emotional blackmail persuade you to change the law or criticise the court's decision. As it stands, the court's decision ensures that today's children will be free to grow up to make their own decisions," it said.

Echoing such comments, Ronald Goldman, head of the U.S.-based Jewish Circumcision Resource Centre which opposes the practice, cited studies he said show that circumcision causes considerable pain and trauma.

"The majority of the world does not circumcise because of an instinctive awareness of the harm, analogous to cutting off any other healthy body part," it said in a statement entitled "The German Circumcision Ruling: What about the harm to the child?"

The German court ruling applies only to the city of Cologne and its environs - home to a large Muslim minority - but Jewish and Muslim groups fear it could set a precedent and the ban could spread to other parts of Germany.

German doctors have also urged politicians to act to clarify the legal situation, fearing the ruling may force circumcisions underground and increase health risks for young boys.

Germany is home to about 120,000 Jews and some four million Muslims, many from Turkey which has criticised the court ruling.

(Editing by Myra MacDonald)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
ml66uk2 wrote:
No-one complained when female circumcision was made illegal, even though some people regard it as their religious right or duty to cut their daughters.

It’s illegal to cut off a girl’s prepuce, or to make any incision on a girl’s genitals, even if no tissue is removed. Even a pinprick is banned. Why don’t boys get the same protection? Everyone should be able to decide for themselves whether or not they want parts of their genitals cut off. It’s *their* body.

Jul 17, 2012 7:17pm BST  --  Report as abuse
James3D wrote:
Banning forced genital cutting of children does NOT make Germany a “laughing stock.” If one knows and understands the severity of the damage suffered by the child in this case, laughing has NOTHING to do with this case of a botched genital surgery forced upon a child.

Chancellor Angela Merkel has an opportunity to lead the world with this ruling. As our understanding of human rights evolves even infant and children, imagine that will also be considered by law, full human beings.

Cutting part of a child’s genital organ off, as a barbaric offering to an imaginary deity, has no place in this modern world. Circumcision of children is abuse. Religion is no excuse.

Jul 18, 2012 9:01pm BST  --  Report as abuse
James3D wrote:
“The constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion do not sanction harming another person in the practice of one’s religion.”

–Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatrics, January 1988.

Jul 19, 2012 6:52am BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.