Court paves way for UK-based cleric's extradition to U.S.

PARIS Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:39pm BST

1 of 2. Muslim cleric, Abu Hamza al-Masri, is seen leading prayers outside the North London Central Mosque, in Finsbury Park, north London in this January 24, 2003 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Toby Melville/Files

Related Topics

PARIS (Reuters) - The European Court of Human Rights gave final approval on Monday for the extradition of one of Britain's most radical Islamist clerics and four others to the United States, where they face terrorism charges.

The decision caps a long legal battle and means Abu Hamza al-Masri could be extradited within weeks. Britain's Home Office, or interior ministry, said it would hand over the suspects "as quickly as possible".

The Egyptian-born al-Masri, 54, filed an appeal, along with the four other suspects, after the court in Strasbourg authorised Britain to transfer him to the United States on charges he supported al Qaeda and aided a fatal kidnapping in Yemen.

Al-Masri, who could face a sentence of more than 100 years in an ultra-secure "Supermax" prison, had argued such treatment would contravene Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits inhumane and degrading treatment.

"Today the Grand Chamber decided to reject the request. This means that the Chamber judgement of April 10, 2012, is now final," the court said in a statement.

The decision also concerned appeals lodged by four other defendants, Babar Ahmad, Syed Tahla Ahsan, Adel Abdul Bary and Khaled Al-Fawwaz, all of whom have been detained in Britain pending extradition to the United States.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We will work to ensure that the individuals are handed over to the U.S. authorities as quickly as possible."

The family of Ahmad called on the government to halt the extradition process, saying British prosecutors were in possession of the material that forms the basis of the U.S. indictment and should pursue the case in Britain.

Al-Masri is one of the most radical Islamists in Britain, a country he has attacked for its support of U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The one-eyed radical with a metal hook for a hand who has praised the September 11, 2001 attacks, was once a preacher at a North London mosque but was later convicted of inciting murder and racial hatred. He is being held in a British jail.

He was indicted in 2004 by a federal grand jury in New York, accused of providing material support to al Qaeda and of involvement in a hostage-taking in Yemen in 1998 in which four hostages - three Britons and one Australian - were killed.

He was also accused of providing material support to al Qaeda by trying to set up a training camp for fighters in the Pacific state of Oregon and of trying to organise support for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

(Reporting by Vicky Buffery in Paris and Alessandra Rizzo in London; Editing by Janet Lawrence)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
mgb500 wrote:
Al-Masri, 54, could face a sentence of over 100 years in an ultra-secure “Supermax” prison, and had argued that such treatment would contravene Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits inhumane and degrading treatment.

That’s a real shame matey…you can always go & live in Afghanistan…but oh, you won’t be able to sponge for benefits there will you? Oh yes, the treatment of those who refuse to take up islam..ie beheading etc..I think that perhaps contravenes THEIR human rights, eh?

Sep 24, 2012 8:04pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
You would have thought the ‘Europeans’ would be only too delighted at the prospect of emptying its trash onto the Americans…

What took so long comrades?

Sep 24, 2012 9:10pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Isn’t it somewhat outrageous (on principal from a Britons perspective) that a court based in Strasbourg is authorising Britain to do anything?

Sep 24, 2012 9:22pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.