UK won't get EU cash for carbon storage - EU sources

BRUSSELS/LONDON Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:35pm GMT

Related Topics

BRUSSELS/LONDON (Reuters) - The British government will not get any European Union funding under the first round of a subsidy scheme for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects because it has failed to provide the required financing guarantees, EU sources said on Sunday.

CCS technology captures carbon emissions from power plants before they enter the atmosphere and then stores them in long-term storage sites.

The British government has included CCS technology in its plans to meet its emissions reduction targets and says it has earmarked 1 billion pounds to fund a commercial scale pilot CCS programme.

One EU source speaking on condition of anonymity confirmed that no British projects had qualified for the so-called NER300 competition "because of lack of funding detail."

Britain's Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) said it had not yet been informed of the decision or what the arrangements might be for the second round.

"We are not going to comment on speculation or rumours," a DECC spokesperson said.

The European Commission, together with the European Investment Bank and EU member states, jointly operate the NER300 financing competition in which governments can shortlist renewable and CCS projects for European subsidies.

EU member states can apply for NER300 funding to finance half of a renewable or CCS project if the national government guarantees funds to cover the remaining 50 percent of the costs.

A second round of projects will be launched early next year and British projects will be able to participate again, the EU source said.

Chris Davies, a British Liberal Democrat politician who led discussion of the funding in the European Parliament, said the failure was "a devastating blow" to hopes of Britain and Europe becoming a world leader in the development of CCS technology.

"The government has no excuse. The EU funding mechanism was only introduced as a result of British pressure and for us not to take advantage of it is simply woeful," he said.

Although proven to work technologically, CCS is a controversial technology because it has not yet been tested at commercial scale and is considered to be expensive since it adds to the cost of electricity generation without adding a value beyond emissions reductions.

Under the NER300 initiative, 300 million EU emissions allowances - which are rights to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide - on the EU European Emissions Trading Scheme were made available to raise financing for installations of innovative renewable energy technologies and carbon capture and storage, or CCS.

The initiative plans to sell the 300 million allowances in two rounds. The sale of the first tranche of 200 million allowances was completed on 28 September 2012, with a second NER300 tranche of 100 million allowances next year.

The European Investment Bank said that it wants the second round of sales to be completed by the end of 2013.

One allowance is valued around 8.30 euros ($10.55) per tonne, exchange and broker data on Reuters shows.

Details of the Britain's list of CCS projects shortlisted for NER300 funding can be seen under: here

(Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
ritchard wrote:
The Uk doesn’t give a dam or a euro for that matter, judging by the hostility of Reuters readers on other topics concerning the EU. They regret every cent contributed and are not interested in receiving a single cent in development / research grants because the UK will go it alone. Collaboration, partnership, sharing with Europe are words far from the minds of most of my compatriots. I can understand my 92 year old aunts attitude that one dispatches the Royal Navy when there is a problem somewhere in the world but quite frankly we are no longer living in that world. There is only one future and that is collaboration and cooperation.

Nov 11, 2012 12:51pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
thorpeman wrote:
No point trying for a prize they don’t have the money to honour!

Nov 11, 2012 10:10pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
AlisdairWilkes wrote:
You make the classic and boring mistake that all pro-EU, pro -government types do about ‘euro-skeptics’ in thinking and claiming we are against all the enlightened things the EU is supposed to be for.
What you fail to realise is nobody is against cooperation and the other stated aims of the European (or other supra-national ) institutions; we are just frustrated at their poor execution, organisation, corruption, over politicisation and expense / value for money.
There is no better example than the Euro; a political project with gargantuan economic complexities that were ignored or played down by a shabby political elite across much of the continent for their own purposes.
The undignified maintenance of vested interests in the current budget discussions suggests the ‘sharing’ side of the EU is about getting others to share the costs of your uncompetitive industries –a good example of this is the ‘green’ energy policy and crooked carbon emissions scheme.

Nov 11, 2012 11:35pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.