UK government reaches compromise on renewable subsidies

LONDON Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:55pm GMT

Electricity pylons are seen in front of Sizewell Nuclear Plant in Suffolk, eastern England November 29, 2005. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez

Electricity pylons are seen in front of Sizewell Nuclear Plant in Suffolk, eastern England November 29, 2005.

Credit: Reuters/Dylan Martinez

Related Topics



LONDON (Reuters) - Britain will triple subsidies for low-carbon power generation by 2020 after its coalition government this week forged a compromise over how to fund wind farms without harming the future of gas-fired power.

The compromise became possible after the government agreed to postpone until 2016 setting a target for decarbonisation, which was opposed by many members of Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative Party. The target is the extent to which carbon emissions are to be reduced by 2030.

The deal is expected to boost the share of renewables in Britain's energy mix to 30 percent by 2020, outpacing European Union targets of 20 percent, and create thousands of new jobs.

"Today we've reached a landmark agreement on energy policy that's going to deliver a clear, durable signal to investors," Cameron's spokeswoman said.

Under the agreed Levy Control Framework, spending on renewable power generation will increase to 7.6 billion pounds a year in real terms by 2020, from the current 2.35 billion pounds, to reduce dependence on gas.

The renewable spending plans will be funded through further rises in household energy bills, which are increasingly unaffordable for many consumers.

Responding to criticism from the British media, Cameron's spokeswoman said the shift toward renewable energy was not the main contributor to higher energy bills, which she said was due to high gas prices and infrastructure investment.

"While the proportion of people's bills will slightly increase in terms of the green aspects, actually when it comes to 2020, the net impact will be that people's bills will fall," she added.

Others were less convinced.

"The proposals are very negative for consumers," Liberium Capital, a London-based investment bank said.

"At face value a 7.5 billion pounds nominal rise in low carbon support could equate to an 80 pounds (20 percent) per household bill increase," it said.

Renewable spending will be focused on rewarding low-carbon power producers like renewables, nuclear and fossil fuel plants fitted with carbon capture and storage technology, a Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) spokesman said.

Divisions over spending plans between energy minister Ed Davey and Chancellor George Osborne have delayed key agreements over energy policy at a time of painful austerity measures introduced by the government.


The new agreement paves the way for the introduction of the Electricity Market Reform (EMR) Bill next week.

Industry group RenewableUK said the plans would create tens of thousands of jobs, bring forward at least 40 billion pounds of private sector investment and allow for a massive expansion of the UK's renewable energy sector.

"The government needs to maintain this momentum in the forthcoming Energy Bill (or EMR)," Renewable UK's Chief Executive Maria McCaffrey said.

"Those investors put 2.5 billion pounds into the industry this year - this will now increase exponentially," she added.

The extra investment announced on Friday will see renewables' share of the energy mix rise from 11 percent now, driven primarily by the 31 gigawatts of wind energy to be installed by 2020.

The spending increase will also help to support new nuclear power and the commercial use of untested carbon capture and storage technologies, the government said.

"This is a durable agreement across the coalition (government), against which companies can invest and support jobs and our economic recovery," Davey said in a statement.

However, environmental group WWF said the postponement in setting a decarbonisation target represented a failure of leadership.

"Having a 2030 decarbonisation target is nothing that Mr Cameron's government should be afraid of, given that it is a key requirement to deliver the legally binding Climate Change Act commitments, which Mr Cameron played such a key part in delivering," WWF's David Nussbaum said.

Nussbaum added that engineering companies such as Spain's Gamesa and Germany's Siemens, who want to invest in the UK's renewable supply chain, need clear long-term government commitments before entering the market.


Reforms are required to attract the 110 billion pounds of low-carbon energy investment that the government says is needed to replace ageing electricity plants fuelled by gas, coal and nuclear, up to a fifth of which face retirement this decade.

However, the EMR bill could be a boon for the gas industry.

"EMR is obviously focused on low carbon, but today's announcements give as much to gas-fired generation as to renewables and nuclear," said Ben Stansfield, senior associate specialising in energy at law firm Clifford Chance.

The government on Friday committed to establishing a system whereby backup power plants, mainly gas-fired, are paid to be ready to fill supply gaps created when the wind does not blow or demand rises during peak time.

Auctions for backup power plant operators will start in 2014 to provide backup capacity in 2018/19, the government said.

(Additional reporting by Mohammed Abbas; editing by David Goodman and Anthony Barker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Meanwhile China, India, Russia and Brazil dont have to suffer the green-lefty activist lobby and pump out whatever CO2 emissions that there economies require.

Britain meanwhile gets blasted back to the early 20th Century at its own economic disadvantage.

Maybe the govt might be best to redirect some of the ridiculous levels of expenditures it pumps into French farming subsidies, back towards Britains population in the form of a British Subsidy of Energy,(BSE) towards those hard-up and energy oppressed, whom are effectively discriminated against for having the same energy,(and sourced the same)that the French consumer gets at a discounted rate over their British counterpart.

Nov 23, 2012 9:28pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.