Cameron faces tightrope EU speech, shuns exit vote

LONDON Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:08pm GMT

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves Downing Street in London December 19, 2012. REUTERS/Neil Hall

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves Downing Street in London December 19, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Neil Hall

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron will spell out plans to dilute Britain's membership of the European Union on Friday, a move that could reshape its role in the world, upset some of the premier's allies and decide his government's fate.

On Monday, when the date for the long talked about speech was finally fixed for January 18 in the Netherlands, the Conservative leader disappointed some in his party by rejecting calls for a quick referendum on leaving the bloc. But he did seem to offer the public the prospect of a vote after renegotiating London's terms of membership.

In what could be one of the most fateful speeches on Europe by a British leader since World War Two, Cameron is expected to say the euro crisis and the closer integration it is driving is a chance for Britain, which has rejected the single currency, to establish a more arms-length relationship with its 26 partners.

Critics say his manoeuvring risks setting in chain an unpredictable sequence of events that could see Britain quit the Union - willingly or unwillingly - and leave the world's sixth largest economy looking like an offshore version of Switzerland or Norway, with considerably less influence than it now wields.

But Cameron, leading a party and a country with a strong anti-European streak, dismisses such talk as fear-mongering. He says he wants Britain to remain in a reformed EU but to seize back control of areas of public life where he and others believe Brussels' influence has become overbearing and pernicious.

In his speech, Cameron is likely to identify major policy areas - from immigration to employment law and legal affairs - where he wants to claw back core competencies from the EU.

"Right now I think there are a lot of people who say 'I would like to be in Europe, but I'm not happy with every aspect of the relationship, so I want it changed'. That is my view," he told the BBC in an interview on Monday.

With anti-EU feeling on the rise at home, he is likely to promise a rare referendum on any new settlement he manages to broker, part of a process that risks upsetting many countries in the EU, by far Britain's biggest trading partner.

"It would be an act of mutual weakness for the UK and for Europe if Britain were to leave the Union," French European Commissioner Michel Barnier said on Monday.

That message was reinforced by a French diplomatic source in the office of President Francois Hollande who said Britain could not have an "a la carte" Europe: "Britain cannot be like Norway in terms of its obligations and still benefit from the single market," the source said.

Joaquin Almunia, the vice president of the European Commission, said a British decision to leave the EU would be "very bad" for other member states and "a disaster" for London, and he thought it would be "extremely difficult" for Cameron to renegotiate ties with the bloc.

"When you belong to a club you cannot be an influential member saying I don't want to accept this provision," he told the BBC's Hardtalk programme.

TIGHT SPOT

Britain joined the bloc in 1973, two decades after the project was begun in the wake of World War Two by France, Germany, Italy and the Benelux countries. Norway and Switzerland are among the few west European states now left out of the EU, though they enjoy specially favoured relations with it.

Cameron is in a tight spot. Opinion polls have consistently shown that a slim majority of the British public wants to leave the EU and a powerful clique inside his own party is pressuring him to call an "in or out" referendum.

He is also in danger of being outflanked on the issue by an upstart political party whose popularity has surged.

Yet prominent business leaders, the opposition Labour party, and figures like former Labour prime minister Tony Blair have warned that his stance risks damaging inward investment and damaging Britain's standing on the world stage.

The issue is potentially career-ending for Cameron. Margaret Thatcher, one of his predecessors, was ousted by her party over the EU and it is a subject that has triggered bitter infighting.

The United States, a close ally, is watching closely. A senior U.S. official made an unusually forceful diplomatic intervention into what is an emotive domestic debate last week, saying Washington wanted Britain to stay inside the EU and remain a "strong voice".

That appeared to be a calculated message sent at a time when Cameron was putting the finishing touches to his Europe speech.

U.S. officials said the comments, by Philip Gordon, President Barack Obama's assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs, restated what was a well-known U.S. position on the subject.

But it was the first time that Washington had voiced its concerns publicly and the intervention laid bare the risks anti-EU rhetoric pose to Britain's cherished "special relationship" with the United States, the foundations of which were laid during the two countries' alliance in World War Two.

Britain has long had an ambivalent relationship with Europe. After the war, London looked to its empire and former colonies for trade and only joined the European club after years in which France, wary of American influence over Britain, kept it out.

Britain has pointedly not adopted the single currency zone nor joined the Schengen open border agreement and Brussels is often depicted in the country's press as a meddling and wasteful superstate that threatens Britain's sovereignty.

COALITION STRAINS

Many Britons blame the EU for what they regard as excessive immigration and say they want Britain to seize back full control of its borders and for British judges to not be subordinate to supranational bodies such as the European Court of Justice.

But many others in the EU are growing exasperated by what they see as Britain's new doubts about the European project.

An ally of German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned on January 10 that Cameron risked isolating Britain and paralysing European integration if he held a referendum, while Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny has described the idea of Britain quitting the EU as "disastrous".

Complicating matters is the pro-EU stance of Cameron's coalition partners in the two-party government, the centre-left Liberal Democrats.

Their leader Nick Clegg has described talk of repatriating powers from Brussels as a "false promise wrapped in a Union Jack" and strong anti-EU rhetoric in Cameron's speech could deepen rifts in the coalition.

Liberal Democrat foreign policy spokesman Martin Horwood said flirting with an EU exit would be taking an "insane risk" with the British economy.

"There are alarm bells ringing in governments around the world that Britain is on some path to exit and that David Cameron hasn't stood up to the Eurosceptics, or Europhobes, in his own party," he told Reuters.

However, anything less than offering a vote containing an option to quit the EU would anger many Conservative lawmakers.

"He could unite 95 percent of the Conservative Party if he were to announce a renegotiation of the terms of our relationship with Europe followed by an in-out referendum," said Peter Bone, a Conservative Eurosceptic lawmaker.

Any member state has the right to secede from the European Union, though none has ever done so.

Cameron says he is acutely aware of the economic benefits of trading with a single market of 500 million Europeans. The bloc accounts for around half of Britain's trade.

Opposition leader Ed Miliband, whose Labour Party has a 12-point opinion poll lead over the Conservatives, said on Sunday it would be "incredibly dangerous" to commit to a referendum on Britain's EU membership: "The prime minister," he said, "Is sleep-walking us towards the exit door."

(Additional reporting by Mohammed Abbas and Tim Castle in London, Paul Taylor and Mark John in Paris and Gareth Jones and Erik Kirschbaum in Berlin; Editing by Alastair Macdonald)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Cameron plays down prospect of in-out EU referendum

Of course he does, as everyone in the U.K are enslaved by the Federal Europe elite already!

Jan 14, 2013 9:42am GMT  --  Report as abuse
AlisdairWilkes wrote:
David Cameron is right to play it down this is a strategically important alliance and decisions should not be made on emotion.

The UK has a very strong negotiating position because our departure would lead to the German, Dutch and other sensible governments sitting around a table with a group of Euro-Socialists for which any problems solution is delivered by the state and paid for by the Germans. They need us and our free market philosophy to prevent that.

If they wish to retain the voice inside the tent though then they will also have to start waking from their slumber and recognise that Europe is getting less competitive and poorer in the world, with the exception of Germany -the ONLY country to have got a competitive devaluation while in the Euro.

This decision should be debated, framed and concluded over a 3 – 5 year time frame. Hurrying will not help us.

I suspect Mr. Cameron may say something similar in his speech.

AHW.

Jan 14, 2013 1:13pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
mgb500 wrote:
So..when he was in opposition, gagging for a vote….then he was lying? What a surprise!

He had better ‘reconsider’ that or he will find the peasants will not take much more being under the jackboot of the 4th Reich!

Jan 14, 2013 1:49pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.