Ratings cut shows need to pare deficit faster - Cameron

LONDON Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:33pm GMT

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron returns to Downing Street after taking his daughter to her school in central London, February 26, 2013. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron returns to Downing Street after taking his daughter to her school in central London, February 26, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Wednesday a decision by Moody's to cut Britain's top-notch triple A credit rating underlined the need to step up efforts to reduce the country's deficit.

"I'm the one saying this credit rating does matter, and it demonstrates that we have to go further and faster on reducing the deficit," Cameron told parliament.

Moody's dealt Britain its first sovereign rating downgrade on Friday, saying the $2.5 trillion (1.65 trillion pounds) economy faced years of sluggish growth and that debt would continue to rise until 2016.

The opposition Labour party has said the downgrade proves Cameron's deficit reduction strategy isn't working, but the government has insisted it won't flinch from its austerity drive. Cameron has also come under pressure from his own ruling Conservative party to make deeper and faster cuts in Britain's welfare budget to try to win the prized AAA rating back.

Ahead of a March 20 budget, investors are looking for any signs the government is considering ratcheting up its austerity push. But an official spokesman for Cameron said the prime minister had been referring to existing rather than new policy.

"The prime minister was setting out the government's policies as they are," the spokesman said. "The period of fiscal consolidation has been extended and that's what the PM was referring to."

(Reporting by Andrew Osborn and Mohammed Abbas; Editing by William Schomberg)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Yep, public sector has had it too good for far too long…

Those public sector body pensions, (which Labour grew the promises for, but without a pot of gold to uphold being the bearers of) is the primary problem,grown over a decade long rampage, of throwing un-anchored cash around, like confetti in the wind.

The country’s tax payers cannot continue to be the ‘collateral’ to further socialist govt led, electoral bribes.

Feb 27, 2013 4:09pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Yep, public sector has had it too good for far too long…

Those public sector body pensions, (which Labour grew the promises for, but without a pot of gold to uphold being the bearers of) is the primary problem,grown over a decade long rampage, of throwing un-anchored cash around, like confetti in the wind.

The country’s tax payers cannot continue to be the ‘collateral’ to further socialist govt led, electoral bribes.

Feb 27, 2013 4:09pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.