Anti-EU party humiliates Cameron in vote

EASTLEIGH Fri Mar 1, 2013 6:16pm GMT

1 of 4. Nick Clegg (R), leader of the Liberal Democrat party, congratulates newly elected MP Michael Thornton at the Ageas Bowl cricket ground in Eastleigh, southern England March 1, 2013. The Liberal Democrat party, the junior partner in Britain's coalition government, won a closely-watched election in England on Friday, while the UK Independence party (UKIP) placed second, pushing the ruling Conservatives into an embarrassing third.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Related Topics

EASTLEIGH (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative Party has been beaten into third place in a vote in southern England by a party that wants Britain to leave the European Union, prompting some lawmakers in his party to question his leadership credentials.

The UK Independence Party has no MPs and Cameron once described its members as "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists", but UKIP came second in Thursday's election for the parliamentary seat in Eastleigh, winning its biggest share of the vote ever.

To compound Cameron's misery, the Liberal Democrat party, the junior partner in his governing coalition, took first place despite being embroiled in high-profile sex and perjury scandals and floundering in national opinion polls.

The result has piled pressure on Cameron from disgruntled lawmakers within his own party who fret he may not be able to lead them to victory in a 2015 national election. Many feel he has turned his back on the kind of traditional Conservatism espoused by former Tory leaders like Margaret Thatcher.

"He's got a very limited amount of time to rekindle the love with the grassroots who will be crucial to win a general election," Stewart Jackson, a Conservative MP, told Reuters.

"For too many of the people who consider themselves Tories, the leadership seems too liberal and elitist. Cameron has got some work to do."

The Conservatives had hoped to win or at least come second in Eastleigh, which is in the county of Hampshire southwest of London, but Cameron played down the defeat.

"This is a by-election, it's mid-term, it's a protest. That's what happens in by-elections," Cameron said.

"It's disappointing for the Conservative Party but we must remain true to our principles, true to our course, and that way we can win people back. I don't think we should tack this way, tack that way."

However, Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, said the vote showed his party was on the verge of a "national political earthquake".

"It's a protest against an entire political class who are not willing to confront difficult issues like open-door immigration," Farage told a news conference on Friday.

Education Secretary Michael Gove, a Conservative, said disillusionment with mainstream politics and anger at Britain's economic woes had played a role in the defeat.


The result was an important win for the Liberal Democrats and Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister and party leader, whose leadership has come under pressure in recent weeks.

They polled 13,342 votes, UKIP 11,571, the Conservatives 10,559 and the Labour Party 4,088. That meant UKIP took almost 28 percent of the vote.

Since becoming leader, Cameron has sought to ground his party in the centre of British politics, but some Conservatives believe in doing so he has alienated traditional supporters over issues such as his support for gay marriage, which UKIP opposes.

"He took the base of his party for granted and just reached out with centrist messages. He sowed the seeds for the problem he now has, which is this growth of UKIP," said Tim Montgomerie, editor of the influential ConservativeHome website.

"I don't suspect UKIP will take a single seat at the next general election. But if they win six, seven, eight percent of the vote which opinion polls and results like this are beginning to suggest they can, they will prevent us getting a majority."

A winner-takes-all constituency voting system makes it hard for small parties to gain seats in the London parliament.

Eastleigh does not directly reflect national sentiment - a YouGov poll in the Sun tabloid on Friday put the opposition Labour party on 42 percent, the Conservatives on 29 percent, the Liberal Democrats 12 percent and UKIP 11 percent.

But heavy austerity measures, combined with an ailing economy heading for its third recession in four years, have sapped support for Cameron, who formed a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats in 2010.

Last week's decision by Moody's to strip Britain of its coveted top-notch triple-A credit rating was an embarrassment and again raised questions about Cameron's leadership. Some Conservative MPs have begun to openly question it.


Farage's party has siphoned off support from traditional Conservatives by denouncing EU bureaucracy and immigration from eastern Europe, tapping into what he says is a widespread feeling that voter concerns have been ignored.

Under pressure from UKIP, Cameron has promised to hold an "in-out" referendum on Britain's membership of the EU by the end of 2017 if he wins the next election, a move his supporters had hoped would steal UKIP's thunder.

Commentators said the election would help stabilise the coalition in the short term, as Clegg's leadership of the Liberal Democrats, without whom the right-wing Conservatives cannot govern or pass legislation, had faced intense pressure.

Irene Cook, 66, a retired shop assistant who voted UKIP, said the party's policies on immigration had attracted her.

"We wanted Britain to stay Britain. We didn't want any more immigration of other people coming in from other countries. It's got to stop. We're only a small island anyway. We voted for them, and I'm very, very pleased, they've done very well."

(Writing by Michael Holden and Andrew Osborn; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (7)
2writestoo wrote:
Every poll conducted in the UK during the past six months has found that the majority of the electorate want reforms of its relations ships with the EU or indeed to get out altogether. Before the last general election the “Prime Minister” David Cameron promised during this parliament to conduct a referendum on the subject of Britain in or out of the EU. This will not now happen as he now promises again, that if elected in 2015, he will hold a referendum circa 2018, however the public will not fall for the deceit a second time. The Liberal Democrats who won today would have the UK stay in the EU even if it meant becoming the seventeenth “Länder” (county/State) of Germany. Ed Miliband the leader of the opposition “Labour Party” is a stanched supporter of the UK remaining in the EU. This is hardly surprising given his European heritage in that his father was of Jewish/ Polish decent who immigrated to the UK from Belgium just before WWII. Having served in the British services during the conflict Miliband senior became a lecturer after the war. Ed Miliband’s mother, a Polish survivor of the holocaust also entered the UK as an immigrant in 1948. Ed Millerband is the epitome of an immigration success story given he is the son of immigrants who having come into the UK succeeded in their endeavours to better their lives. This is borne out by the fact that a second UK generation Miliband could become the Prime Minister of Britain. Ed Milliband the darling of the politically correct brigade, by heritage is understandably a staunched supporter of European membership and would remain in Europe even if it required Britain to become the twenty third metropolitan region of France. The point; any British or UK voter who wishes to get out of Europe has only one option, vote for the anti European “United Kingdom Independence Party” (UKIP) and if this local election is anything to go by quite a lot will.

Mar 01, 2013 5:24am GMT  --  Report as abuse
UKCitizenAbroad wrote:
“The point; any British or UK voter who wishes to get out of Europe has only one option, vote for the anti European “United Kingdom Independence Party” (UKIP) and if this local election is anything to go by quite a lot will.”

Certainly quite a lot will. Fortunately it is never likely to be enough to cause any risk of it actually happening.

Mar 01, 2013 7:07am GMT  --  Report as abuse
ema123 wrote:
Bob Diamond personally took over 100 million, things have not changed,illegal actions are not punished, and banks will work around the firewall between investment banks and the high street.

The banks investment arm gambling zero sum gain, any win is offset my an equal loss, to line their own pockets, with all risk borne out by the shareholder, tax payer, pensions and numerous front line services.

Barclays loaned vast sums to a Middle East entity so that it could lend them the money so they did not have to borrow from the government which would limit their bonuses, and the risk would be taken by the tax payer.

The economy was crippled when the banks stopped lending to business as they did not want to be landed with the vast debt they had been selling.

Cameron, Boris Johnson and many papers argue that limiting bonus is bad, in spite of the fact it has caused a decade worth of damage and devastated our pensions. I trust none of these individuals or members of their family will be going to a comfortable overpaid bank job in a few years’ time.

The financial sector can seemingly corrupt politicians, or at least make them dumb at blind. Bad banks damage economies, and that puts people out of work. The EU has the power and is motivated by numerous countries to help the UK population.

Be sure people the banks will appeal to your stupidity and greed, suggesting that they are looking for high flyers, that getting out of the mess they created can only be done by them. They will tell you limiting bonuses will push up salaries, then turn around and say that banks will leave, a flat contradiction. A zero sum gain gamble benefits no one, if you cannot understand that, and you are stupid and greedy, then our children will see the low paid menial stupidity that follows.

If we cannot protect our weakest, then be sure we are sinking.

Mar 01, 2013 7:25am GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.