Nigel Evans quizzed over rape, denies allegations

LONDON Sun May 5, 2013 3:34pm BST

1 of 4. Conservative MP and Deputy House of Commons Speaker Nigel Evans speaks during a news conference in Pendleton, northern England May 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Nigel Roddis

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - The deputy speaker of the Commons, Nigel Evans, was arrested this weekend on suspicion of rape and sexual assault, but said on Sunday the allegations against him were "completely false".

The 55-year-old member of Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative party was detained on Saturday over attacks allegedly carried out at his home in Lancashire, northern England between July 2009 and March of this year, police said.

After being granted bail, Evans told reporters: "Yesterday I was interviewed by the police concerning two complaints - one of which dates back four years - made by two people who are well known to each other and who until yesterday I had regarded as friends.

"The complaints are completely false and I cannot understand why they have been made, especially as I have continued to socialise with one as recently as last week."

No further details of the complainants have been released by Lancashire police.

Evans, who has been a MP for some 20 years, was elected as one of three deputy speakers three years ago.

The role mainly involves adjudicating the often noisy and fractious debates between Britain's rival parties who face each other across the floor of the Commons.

Evans, who announced to a newspaper in 2010 that he was gay, was vice-chairman of the Conservative party from 1999 to 2001 and shadow Welsh Secretary for two years after that while the Conservatives were in opposition.

(Reporting by Stephen Addison; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Is it really right of the establishment press, to report unsubstantiated (criminally serious) claims and wittingly/unwittingly act as vehicles of ‘smear’, where those claims come to nought?

May 05, 2013 12:07pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Why wasnt a Superinjunction not automatically put into place and triggered?

At least upto final judgement by way of Crown Court judgement…

May 05, 2013 12:36pm BST  --  Report as abuse
JSC1 wrote:
I wonder why we don’t name the accusers.

May 05, 2013 6:21pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.