Head of radical Islamist group who knew knifeman blames UK foreign policy

LONDON Thu May 23, 2013 3:42pm BST

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - The head of a banned British radical Islamist group who knew one of the men who hacked a soldier to death on London streets said on Thursday British foreign policy was to blame for the attack.

Anjem Choudary said Michael Adebolajo - filmed with his hands covered with blood, carrying a meat cleaver and knife after attacking an off-duty soldier in broad daylight - had attended lectures run by al-Muhajiroun, Choudary's organisation, which was banned under anti-terrorism laws in 2010.

"He used to attend a few demonstrations and activities that we used to have in the past," Choudary told Reuters, adding he had not seen him for about two years. "When I knew him he was very pleasant man, he was peaceful, unassuming and I don't think there's any reason to think he would do anything violent."

Choudary's organisation gained notoriety for staging events to commemorate the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States with leaflets that referred to the hijackers as "the Magnificent 19". It's Syrian-born founder Omar Bakri was banished from Britain in 2005.

Choudary has always maintained that al-Muhajiroun forbids its followers in Britain from carrying out attacks there under a "covenant of security" demanded of Muslims in non-Muslim lands.

"I would not consider him to be a member of the organisation I don't think he was intellectually affiliated, he was a contact. He used to attend some stuff," Choudary said of Adebolajo. He said he did not recognise the other suspect but had not seen clear images of him.

"If you are a practising Muslim male and you want to do something then you'll probably come across us at one time or another so I don't think you should be surprised that he's been attending some of our activities."

Sources familiar with Britain's investigation of the two suspects say both were British men of Nigerian heritage, and both were on the radar of the authorities before the attack.

Acquaintances have identified Adebolajo, who was filmed explaining the motives for the attack, as a convert who grew up Christian.

He attended Marshall's Park school in Romford, an overwhelmingly white suburb on London's north-east outskirts.

"I'm not in the business of condemnation or condoning," Choudary said of the attack. "I think if anyone needs to be condemned it is the British government and their foreign policy. It's so clear that that is the cause."

He added: "I think we're all shocked by it. But he said it all in that clip.... He blamed (Prime Minister David) Cameron and he blamed the army and the authorities, and he said that British public should do something about it because they're not doing anything in their names."

"From the statements that he's made himself, it's clear that that was being targeted. The cause is clear - it's the British foreign policy."

Choudary's organisation has been known for staging protests at funerals of British troops and for burning the paper poppies that Britons wear annually in November to commemorate war dead. It called its Remembrance Day protest "Hell for Heroes", a variation of the name of the veterans' charity "Help for Heroes" whose T-shirt was worn by Thursday's soldier victim.

One of Choudary's followers, Richard Dart, converted by Choudary to Islam, pleaded guilty to terrorism charges in March. Authorities said Dart had discussed attacking Royal Wootton Basset, a town that holds ceremonies for British troops killed abroad whose bodies are repatriated to a nearby air field.

Choudary said banning organisations like al-Muhajiroun increased the chance of attacks taking place in Britain.

"I believe al Muhajiroun are very beneficial for people to express their anger. When you start to ban organisations from merely thought crimes and because you don't agree with what they say about foreign policy, then I don't think you should be surprised that people manifest their anger in different ways.

"They are doing these kind of lone wolf, or DIY (do-it-yourself) type operations."

"I'm not going to stop talking about the foreign policy. I'm not going to say Muslims in Muslim countries who are being bombed don't have a right to defend themselves. If that's being radical, then yeah I'm a radical. But in terms of targeting people, in terms of carrying these operations we are very clear on our stance in the covenant of security."

(Writing by Peter Graff)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Blaming the politics of radical Islamist adherents,(and their own foreign policy agenda) would be nearer the mark.

May 23, 2013 3:55pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Nigeria has a well-known cancerous cell of killer-Islamics operating within…

What better response? (from the UK) than aiding (further) the fight against the evil group(s) of armed ideology crazies, by redoubling the efforts in providing enhanced assistance’s to the Nigerian people, (hand-in-hand with their govt) in combating those subhuman abominations scourging their country.

May 23, 2013 4:39pm BST  --  Report as abuse
pavlaki wrote:
More Muslims are killed around the world by other Muslims than by any Western power. This is nothing to do with this. They would still hate us for one reason or another even if we (the west) were not involved anywhere in Muslim countries. Ironically one of the reasons we are involved is to stop them killing each other! Islam does not condone this violence. The problem is extreme male dominated tribal culture that is incompatible with western values. These young men cannot fit in and look to someone or something that proves it is not their fault but the world around them. The perversion of Islam taught by some radical groups full fills their need.

What is needed is for the Imams to constantly preach true Islamic values and to condemn over and over again this violence. If these men were told by influential figures in the religious community that violence and such acts are anti Islam then there would be much less chance of such events happening. Unfortunately the response to date has been a bit half hearted.

May 24, 2013 10:18am BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.