UK to list Royal Mail, woos workers with free shares

LONDON Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:22pm BST

1 of 5. Postal workers stand with Dave Ward (C), deputy general secretary of the Communications Workers Union (CWU), during a protest against the privatisation of the Royal Mail, outside their headquarters in London July 10, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett

Related Topics

Quotes

   

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain will list a majority stake in the Royal Mail postal service on the stock market in the next nine months, promising free shares for workers fiercely opposed to the country's biggest privatisation in around 20 years.

Analysts expect the initial public offering (IPO) to value Royal Mail, which traces its roots to a service founded by King Henry VIII in 1516, at 2-3 billion pounds ($3-$4.5 billion), so selling a majority stake could raise over 1 billion pounds to help the country's stretched finances.

In a bid to weaken support for trade unions, which have helped to scupper past attempts to sell off the business, the government said it would give away 10 percent of shares in Royal Mail to its 150,000 UK postal workers, with the condition that they must be held for three years.

The company's management has long argued that access to external capital is vital as it invests in shifting its business away from falling letter volumes and toward a growing parcels industry fuelled by internet shopping.

But unions have threatened strike action, arguing privatisation could jeopardise Royal Mail's commitment to provide a universal, six-days-a-week service and lead to a decline in working conditions for staff.

Business Secretary Vince Cable sought to sooth such concerns, saying the universal service would be protected by regulator Ofcom as well as parliament, and that privatisation would not trigger a change in employment conditions.

"It cannot be right for Royal Mail to come cap in hand to ministers each time it wants to invest and innovate. The public will always want government to invest in schools and hospitals ahead of Royal Mail," he said.

State postal services have been privatised across much of western Europe. Last month, Belgium's bpost received strong interest in its stock market debut, which was priced towards the top end of expectations.

Royal Mail, which no longer includes the Post Office services and retail business, more than doubled profit in the year ended March 31, helped by parcel demand.

PUBLIC OFFERING

The listing, which will take place in the company's current financial year, will include a retail offering for the public, for which Royal Mail workers will also receive priority treatment. Banks Goldman Sachs and UBS have been appointed as lead advisers for the IPO.

Cable said the government would retain flexibility on the size of stake to be sold, pending market conditions and demand.

Britain's Conservative-Liberal coalition government, which paved the way for privatisation last year by freeing Royal Mail of its hefty pension liabilities, has been criticised by the main opposition Labour party for pushing to sell off the firm at a time when its profits are rising.

The privatisation push follows similar attempts by the Conservatives in 1994 and by Labour in 2009, both of which were scuppered by union threats and party rebellions, with the latter attempt also succumbing to rocky financial markets.

In a consultative ballot sent to 112,000 Royal Mail workers in June, the Communication Workers Union said that, from a 74 percent turnout, 96 percent opposed plans to sell the firm. It urged the government to consider other ways to access capital or risk strike action.

The retail element of the IPO plan is rare for Britain, and only usually considered for well known companies. In October last year insurer Direct Line sold around 15 percent of its 787 million pound IPO to retail investors who on average bought 5,000-6,000 pounds worth of shares.

A YouGov poll commissioned for a Think Tank paper released on Wednesday exploring the merits of privatising Royal Mail showed that just 53 percent of the British public are aware of the sale plans, with 67 percent of people opposed to it.

(Additional reporting by Kylie MacLellan; Editing by Kate Holton and Mark Potter)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
dwaynek wrote:
This bloke does NOT have a clue what his public are saying – if he did he would know to give up office and leave – same with millipede bloke

Jul 10, 2013 12:43pm BST  --  Report as abuse
MobiusPizza wrote:
Privatisation is a dirty word. Does men ever learn from history? See what a sorry state we are with our rail infrastructure, which once was world leading and gone to overpriced shambles with overall customer satisfaction below 70% after it was privatised. Company don’t care about the general public, all they ever see is profit.

Jul 10, 2013 3:26pm BST  --  Report as abuse
meolive wrote:
At least the Torys are actually calling a spade a spade here and are using the dreaded “P word”, rather than trying to hide it behind a meaningless term like “big society” or some other BS.

Of course, who cares if two thirds of the public oppose the sale of a national asset. Little things like public opinion and common sense have never stopped Osborne before!

Jul 10, 2013 4:53pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.