Pay rise for MPs angers austerity-hit Britain

LONDON Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:45pm BST

Britain's Deputy Prime Minister and leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, delivers his keynote speech at the party's spring conference in Brighton, southern England March 10, 2013. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

Britain's Deputy Prime Minister and leader of the Liberal Democrats, Nick Clegg, delivers his keynote speech at the party's spring conference in Brighton, southern England March 10, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's MPs will get a 9 percent pay rise under a proposal announced on Thursday that outraged a public struggling with wage freezes, high living costs and a government austerity drive.

The proposal - which, ironically, was made by a panel created to mend parliament's image after an expenses scandal - is uncomfortable for David Cameron, a prime minister seen by many as part of an out-of-touch elite, adrift from the worries of most voters.

Tabled by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), created to distance MPs from the pay and expenses system, the proposal cannot be blocked by MPs, even if they were to oppose it.

Cameron's spokesman said the prime minister "doesn't think MPs' pay should be going up when public sector pay is being rightly constrained".

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said the plan, to increase MPs' annual pay to 74,000 pounds from 66,396 pounds, was "incomprehensible".

The proposal is way above the 2.7 percent inflation rate and comes at a time of job losses, public sector cuts and low wage growth following a deep recession.

"Everyone has to be treated as fairly and equally as possible in the public sector," Clegg told LBC radio.

Public support for parliament was dented by the 2009 scandal when politicians were exposed boosting their income by claiming expenses for everything from pornographic films and dog food to tennis court repairs.

The public has until October 20 to respond to the proposal before the IPSA makes a final decision on what it said it was a package to end years of "fixes, fudges and failures" over MPs' pay.

If no changes are made to the plan, MPs' pay will rise in 2015, the year of the next election. They will lose some perks, including money for evening meals and late night taxis home.

Public workers, unions and campaigners were appalled.

"The idea of hiking MPs' pay when everyone else has been suffering such a squeeze on their earnings is totally unpalatable," said Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, which campaigns for lower taxes.

Unions said pay freezes or rises capped at 1 percent were widespread since the coalition government came to power in 2010.

"The very idea that MPs should enjoy an exemption and take a 9 percent increase will rightly cause outrage amongst workers up and down the country," said Dave Prentis, head of Unison, Britain's biggest trade union.

Debate over how much MPs should be paid has raged since they first received an annual salary, of 400 pounds, in 1911. That was meant to open politics to people without independent wealth.

(Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (9)
meolive wrote:
You’ve got to love how, through the IPSA, they have effectively created a system where they are awarded pay rises “even if they [...] oppose it”. It gives Clegg, Cameron and co. the perfect ‘out’, they can even complain about the injustice of it all, all the while saying “sorry, we can’t do anything about it!”
Come on guys, this whole scheme is pretty transparent.

Jul 11, 2013 3:06pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
So how do MP’s salaries compare to the local govt, judiciary and broadcasting salary grades?

Is it really right a British MP is paid less than (say) a BBC sports bulletin readers salary? (How much does a Dimbleby get paid for his very own ‘public’ broadcast Question Time?)

Do we place so little importance in national politics and governance, and reflect this all, in what we award?

If we feel so aggrieved by MP’s pay levels, why not,(?) other public servants pay awards, and in a equal way?

Jul 11, 2013 4:53pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
The most senior members of the nation’s judiciary collect an average of £187,265 each, according to a study of European justice systems.

High Court Judges take home around 170,000 pounds.

Now Clegg (as a Federalist advocate) knows full well that MP’s can make more as MEP’s. (91,000 tax free, with claims and expenses adding considerably to that figure)

So I’d take whatever Brussels’s ‘point-man’ in Westminster,(Clegg) says as a touch hypocritical!

Jul 11, 2013 5:04pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.