Britain should scrap high-speed rail 'grand folly' - business group

LONDON Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:21pm BST

1 of 2. A man cycles past an anti high speed rail project (HS2) banner in Austrey, central England, August 27, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Darren Staples

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain should abandon plans for a high speed rail link between London and central and northern England because the multi-billion-pound "grand folly" will not offer value for money, an influential business group said on Tuesday.

The government has said the project will generate thousands of jobs and boost business by slashing travel times from regional cities to the economic powerhouse in the capital.

But the warning from the Institute of Directors (IoD) adds to a growing chorus of dissent, from senior opposition figures, communities along the route and some of the government's own supporters, alarmed by the cost and the impact of building work.

"It is time for the government to look at a thousand smaller projects instead of falling for one grand folly," IoD director Simon Walker said in a statement.

The Conservative-led government should upgrade Britain's existing rail lines, stations and tunnels, he added.

Britain has long grappled with charges that it lags behind other European networks like France's high-speed TGV system, and developing nations like China, which started using the world's longest high-speed railway line in early January.

A survey showed just 27 percent of IoD members felt the high speed rail project (HS2) represented good value for money.

Just over 40 percent saw it as important to their business, down from 54 percent two years ago, the organisation added.

There was little enthusiasm for the project, even in regions that were supposed to benefit, Walker said. "Our research shows that almost every region expects London to benefit the most," he added.

The government had to increase is budget for the project by almost 10 billion pounds ($15.58 billion) to 42.6 billion pounds in June because of the addition of a tunnel to the plans.

HS2 Chief Executive Alison Munro defended the scheme on Tuesday, saying Britain's existing lines would not be able to cope with growing passenger numbers and the new line would regenerate many British cities.

"There are after all only so many trains you can fit into a section of track and the East Coast and West Coast main lines are virtually full already ... There is no other alternative that delivers the benefits of HS2," she said.

Former British finance minister Alistair Darling, from the opposition Labour party, said this month the rising budget would drain funds from other lines.

He was in power when the first stage of the project was approved in principle in 2010, but the spiralling cost had forced him to change his mind and oppose it, he said.

The first phase of the project, between London and Birmingham in central England, is scheduled to start in 2017 and finish in 2026. The second phase, linking Manchester and Leeds, is due to be completed by 2033. ($1 = 0.6419 British pounds)

(Reporting by Li-mei Hoang; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
We have a regional high speed system all ready…

Its called regional airports.

They are going to spend vast pots of borrowed wealth, (which will likely help fill the pockets of a few ‘privileged’ individuals in positions of preference) upon a vanity project, and then let the rest of the infrastructure go to total rack & ruin.

Idiocy in action by a govt thats rapidly disappearing into irrelevance.

If this stupid govt really wants to get people travelling quickly, subsidise airfares! (damn sight cheaper, than blowing 50 bn (of borrowed wealth) on shaving twenty minutes off a rail journey)

Aug 27, 2013 4:42pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.