Cameron pushes U.N. resolution on Syrian chemical arms

LONDON Tue Sep 10, 2013 9:17pm BST

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves Number 10 Downing Street to attend Prime Minister's Questions at parliament in London September 4, 2013. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron leaves Number 10 Downing Street to attend Prime Minister's Questions at parliament in London September 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain, France and the United States will try to win support for a tough resolution on Syrian chemical weapons in the United Nations Security Council later on Tuesday, said Prime Minister David Cameron.

Cameron had earlier said that the three countries would formally submit such a resolution later on Tuesday, but a British government source familiar with the matter told Reuters it would take a little longer before that could happen.

Detailed discussions about a draft resolution among the U.N. Security Council's five permanent members could go on for the next 24 hours, the source said, and only then could a resolution be formally submitted.

"The prize is potentially ridding the world of the single largest stock of chemical weapons," the source said, saying Britain and others had a duty to try to achieve that despite being sceptical about Syrian promises.

Syria on Tuesday accepted a Russian proposal to surrender its chemical weapons in order to win a possible reprieve from punitive U.S. military strikes which U.S. President Barack Obama has floated as a way of preventing a repeat of a suspected chemical attack on August 21.

Cameron, who said he had spoken to Obama about the issue earlier on Tuesday, told lawmakers: "If this is a serious proposal then we should act accordingly and I think a U.N. Security Council resolution is a good idea."

"In that resolution I think it's quite important that we have some clarity about thresholds. We need to know that there's a proper timetable for doing this, we need to know there'd be a proper process for doing it, and crucially there'd have to be consequences if it wasn't done."

Cameron said the world needed to test how genuine the Russian proposal to place Syria's chemical weapons under international control was, saying it was important to make sure the idea wasn't "some delaying tactic, some ruse".

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said separately that time was short to try to ensure that the Syrian offer to surrender its chemical arms was credible, noting that President Bashar al-Assad's government had "consistently failed to match promises with action".

(Editing by Mike Collett-White)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
If the words “Chapter VII” are any near the proposal, then the resolution then that proposal is going to fail, which is probably why France suggested it in the first place.

Also France needs to address the 20 victims of Halabja, whom have lodged a formal complaint against France for its part in supplying the precursor chemicals for that notorious attack, to the former Iraqi regime.

Sep 10, 2013 9:22pm BST  --  Report as abuse
ektope wrote:
The west’s war mongers are always war mongers until the date someone will be strong enough to fight them with nuclear weapons and bring the end to this earth.That days no t very far .Iran will do it.

Sep 10, 2013 10:23pm BST  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
Mr Obama,

Get a grip and start offering assistance towards the defeat of transnational AQ within Northern Syria.(before the problem gets completely out of hand!)

If that means aiding both the Syrian govt and the SAA, then so be it!

Pissing about letting the worst of all evils succeed,(Zawahiri) is a highly irresponsible state of affairs to allow.

Sep 10, 2013 11:37pm BST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.