Shale gas fracking a low risk to public health - UK review

LONDON Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:39pm GMT

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - The risks to public health from emissions caused by fracking for shale oil and gas are low as long as operations are properly run and regulated, the British government's health agency said on Thursday.

Public Health England (PHE) said in a review that any health impacts were likely to be minimal from hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which involves the pumping of water and chemicals into dense shale formations deep underground.

Environmental campaigners have staged large anti-fracking protests in Britain, arguing that it can pollute groundwater and cause earthquakes.

Since there is currently no fracking in Britain, the PHE report examined evidence from countries such as the United States, where it found that any risk to health was typically due to operational failure.

"The currently available evidence indicates that the potential risks to public health from exposure to emissions associated with the shale gas extraction process are low if operations are properly run and regulated," said John Harrison, director of PHE's centre for radiation, chemical and environmental hazards.

"Good well construction and maintenance is essential to reduce the risks of groundwater contamination," he added.

Britain's Conservative-led government, seeking a U.S.-style production boom to offset dwindling North Sea oil and gas reserves, has backed fracking as an "energy revolution" that could create jobs and cut energy prices.

Energy Minister Michael Fallon welcomed the report and said companies would be granted permission to frack for shale oil and gas in Britain only if their operations are considered to be safe.

"Public safety and health is paramount," he said, adding that the government would work with the industry "to ensure stringent safety guidelines are upheld" in shale exploration.

Green activist groups say the government should instead invest more in renewable energy.

"Low risk is not the same as no risk," said Friends of the Earth energy campaigner Helen Rimmer. "Evidence suggests fracking has contaminated drinking water in Australia and the United States. There's no guarantee it won't happen here."

Greenpeace said earlier this month it would encourage British landowners to join together in legally opposing fracking, a move that could strengthen the opposition to shale exploration and development.

Responding to the PHE's report, Quentin Fisher, a professor of petroleum geoengineering at the University of Leeds, said it was "yet another study" suggesting contamination of groundwater due to fracking was unlikely.

"The report provides even more evidence that production of gas from shale can be made very safe," he added.

Ken Cronin, chief executive of the UK Onshore Operators Group which represents the onshore oil and gas industry, also welcomed the report, saying he hoped its findings would "reassure communities up and down the country that shale gas can be extracted with minimal risk to their wellbeing".

(Reporting by Kate Kelland; editing by Tom Pfeiffer and Jane Baird)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
slsilves wrote:
They say emissions? emissions only? Are they only looking at part of the overall process? what use is a study if you only are looking at one thing rather then the entire process? and using the USA studies which are not independent but funded by the gas industry is not a good example.

Oct 31, 2013 12:59pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
TrojanHorus wrote:
Unfortunately the key report which the Government is basing its commentary on, that from the Royal Academy of Engineers is tainted because for years the society was headed up by one of the main financial beneficiaries of fracking, Lord Browne, who’s position at Cuadrilla, and as a Cabinet advisor, renders that report almost worthless.

Also best practice will be resisted by the energy Corporations, just as it successfully was in the US.

The statistical evidence of Professor Anthony Ingraffia of Cornell University that even new wells routinely fail and then leak and dangerously so leaves only one conclusion to be reached and it isn’t this review summary.

Nov 01, 2013 9:26am GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.