'War game' highlights risks of Britain's EU exit

LONDON Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:55pm GMT

The EU and the Union flags fly outside The European Commission Representation in the United Kingdom in central London January 23, 2013. REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth

The EU and the Union flags fly outside The European Commission Representation in the United Kingdom in central London January 23, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Stefan Wermuth

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's renegotiation of its EU ties risks starting a chain of events that could lead to the 28-nation bloc's paralysis or disintegration, politicians and analysts said on Wednesday.

German, French, Irish and Italian participants in a "war game" simulating the process said British attempts to repatriate powers would open Pandora's Box, with other EU nations jockeying to win concessions and appeal to voters swayed by the rise of eurosceptic parties.

Renegotiating Britain's place in Europe before an in/out referendum will be one of Prime Minister David Cameron's central policies in his campaign for re-election in 2015.

Former Irish prime minister John Bruton said a proposal by members of Cameron's Conservative Party for a new "red card" to allow members to block EU laws would paralyse decision-making.

"Does it (Britain) want the European Union to continue - whether it is in it or not - as a workable entity that has the capacity to make decisions reasonably efficiently," said Bruton, who served as EU ambassador to the United States. "Or does it want the European Union essentially to wither away?"

The event was organised by Open Europe, a eurosceptic think tank funded by business leaders which campaigns for a "slimmed down" EU that focused on free trade.

Based on the sort of "war game" used by military planners and companies to prepare for big events, organisers asked politicians and commentators to take on the role of European governments to discuss the British reforms.

The second part considered the fallout from a vote to leave the EU.


British lawmaker Andrea Leadsom, a member of Cameron's Conservatives and a campaigner for EU reform, said Britain wanted to see powers moved from the EU to national parliaments.

Britain wants to opt out of some EU-wide laws on justice, social and employment laws, open the bloc's single market to trade in services as well as goods and reform the rules on agriculture and fisheries, she said.

"The European Union is standing like the Roman Empire in its dying days. It is becoming incredibly complacent. We have to change things," she said.

Her party is under pressure to respond to the rise of the UK Independence Party, which wants to leave the EU.

Sitting around a boardroom table surrounded by posters of British symbols such as the red London bus and Big Ben, one speaker representing Italy said Britain's exit from the EU could lead to the bloc's collapse.

"We are worried that renegotiating is only the first step towards the breaking up of Europe," said Lucio Caracciolo, an Italian political commentator. "It's about the disintegration of Europe."

Giving Britain a new EU role would lead to other countries demanding special treatment, the panel heard.

"We are afraid this would open up Pandora's Box. Other governments would put things on the table because they are also under pressure, often from right-wing or eurosceptic anti-EU parties," said Ulrich Speck, a German commentator.

Any changes to the treaties on which the EU is founded could be blocked in national referendums, he added.

If Britain votes to leave the EU in a referendum Cameron hopes to hold in 2017, Ireland's Bruton said Britain's economy would suffer as banks relocate to Europe and it has to pay for access to the EU single market. There would be no return, he said.

"Britain is on its own. Everybody will lose."

(Editing by Angus MacSwan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
high_isp wrote:
The UK does not want, nor should it expect, special treatment. The whole push for reform is for the benefit of all nations within the EU. It must be recognised, however, that the UK has an (almost) unique position whereby the majority of migrants to and within Europe want to be there. That is clearly unsustainable. The EU partners needs to see that and rein in free movement and the associated ‘rights’ to benefits which are not beneficial to the host country. France and Germany have (possibly illegal) protective legislation, making them less attractive. The UK should be able to do the same thing, but within the EU law.

Dec 11, 2013 9:39pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
Raymond.Vermont wrote:
No problems, if the UK doesnt get powers returned and meaningful changes, it can always rejoin EFTA and then apply for EAU association.

Best of all worlds…

Dec 11, 2013 10:39pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
thorpeman wrote:
Whats wrong with WTO arrangements? Its not like our biggest industry (Services) gets access to the EU marketplace anyway. Less than 8% of UK GDP revolves around the EU with much of so called EU trade only passing through Rotterdam or Antwerp on the way to the real end customer. We lost a large chunk of our GDP in the financial crash & in less than a decade we will be back in a better place than where we were before the crisis. The same will happen if the EU refused point blank to trade with us ever again but we know thats never going to happen. All we want is a FTA arrangement like that for Korea or Canada if not we will take WTO arrangements & lets face it world tariffs are minimal now days & can you see airbus delivering planes without wings or engines? No, neither can I.

Dec 12, 2013 8:35pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.