Iran, six world powers resume expert talks on nuclear deal

GENEVA/BRUSSELS Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:57pm GMT

Related Topics

GENEVA/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Iran and six world powers resumed expert-level talks in Geneva on Thursday to work out how to put into practice a landmark deal obliging Tehran to curb its nuclear program in return for some relief from economic sanctions.

Discussions on the implementation details of last month's breakthrough accord were interrupted by Tehran diplomats last week, after a decision by the United States to blacklist 19 more Iranian companies and individuals.

But diplomats said much progress had been achieved in the four-day meeting on December 9-12 in Vienna and expressed hope they could wrap up the practical discussions at meetings in Geneva on Thursday and Friday.

That could mean the seven countries - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain, Germany and Iran - would be ready to agree on a date when the accord goes fully into effect.

Specifically, they would decide when western governments ease sanctions and how much prior verification of any Iranian curbs of its most sensitive nuclear work would be needed ahead of time.

Diplomats have said their target time frame was the second half of January, possibly on the day of the next meeting of EU foreign ministers on January 20, who could approve easing of EU sanctions.

"We were at an advanced stage in Vienna," said a diplomat from one of the six world powers. "A lot of work has been done so we can go very fast."

The diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity, cautioned, however, that some western diplomats were concerned Iran could be "more difficult" in the technical discussions because of Washington's decision to expand sanctions this month.

"I am afraid the Iranians will be tougher now," he said.

The nuclear accord is designed to halt Iran's nuclear advances for a period of six months to buy time for negotiations on a final settlement of the decade-old standoff.

Iran rejects western suspicions that its atomic work is aimed at acquiring nuclear weapons and says it is for peaceful purposes only.

U.S. officials have said the new blacklistings should not complicate the practical talks and are part of U.S. efforts to continue exposing those supporting Iran's nuclear program or seeking to evade current sanctions.

DETAILING CONCESSIONS

Underscoring Iranian concerns, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi travelled to Brussels this week, in part, to discuss the U.S. decision with the EU's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, who oversees contacts with Iran on behalf of the powers.

In the technical discussions, experts aim to resolve issues dealing with how exactly sanctions can be lifted and what specifically Iran must do to meet its obligations on suspending parts of its nuclear work.

Diplomats said some issues had already been resolved in Vienna last week, including some aspects of how the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, will verify what Iran has done before the deal can be put into effect.

Questions remain on how western governments will ensure banks understand what transactions are allowed under the softened sanctions regime, and how and when Iran will be allowed to access several billion dollars worth of oil revenues frozen in overseas accounts.

Under discussion are issues such as the technical details of how Iran will limit its enrichment of uranium to less than 20 percent, a level that constitutes a major technological leap en route to producing weapons fuel.

Iran has agreed to suspend enriching uranium to 20 percent under the November accord.

Scope for easing the dispute peacefully opened after the June election of a comparative moderate, Hassan Rouhani, as Iranian president. He won in a landslide by promising to lessen Tehran's international isolation and win relief from sanctions that have severely damaged the oil producer's economy.

(Writing by Justyna Pawlak; Editing by Mark Trevelyan and Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
beautyatplayboy wrote:
What is the point of this continued war on muslims? Guys acting hung-ho patrolling through poppy fields and goat herder pre historic caves. We should remove troops and only keep special CIA operatives in this region. We create a natural partisan rebellion by invading other countries. The president set by the Bush administration of a “corrective” regime change war has cost us too much blood and treasure. Military spending does not trickle around and the loss of our warriors in a badly directed exercise in futility is unpardonable. To save face we elected Barak Obama. Why does he insist on a continued failed policy in this region. We need Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Persia and Syria to be friendly to our cultural and economic exchanges. To pacify the hate generated by the Christian Right against these countries will require many years of truth telling. Muslim’s are just as good as us if not better. Their civilizations date back thousands of years. Like most countries their citizens are for the most part unbelievers of state run propaganda and religious theocratical darkness. We must engage these people as they are, not as defined by a stupid State Dept. Fomenting the “Arab Spring” uprising seemed like a natural democracy creating “good” idea. The mistake is that the ends never justify the means. With a new democratically elected leader their is little change in the situation of the citizens of Syria, Egypt, Libya, Iran…etc. The ruling elite of these countries visit the West regularly. Changing the “leader” only causes turmoil that in the end those not benefit the West. If the goal is to better the lot of the populace of these countries then we have failed tremendously, How many more displaced Syrians in refugee camps do you want? Time to make peace with now!
The plan for a cold war between Israel and Iran is failed. If the Russian want a nuke enabled Iran then we will have one, they can block any action at the UN security council. Don’t waste our time please!

Dec 19, 2013 11:17pm GMT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.