Reuters logo
7 months ago
Fitch Affirms Chile at 'A+'; Revises Outlook to Negative
December 13, 2016 / 5:18 PM / 7 months ago

Fitch Affirms Chile at 'A+'; Revises Outlook to Negative

16 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) NEW YORK, December 13 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Chile's Long-term Foreign- and Local-currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'A+' and 'AA-', respectively, and has revised the Outlook to Negative. The issue ratings on Chile's senior unsecured Foreign- Currency bonds are also affirmed at 'A+'. The Short-term Foreign- and Local-currency IDRs have been affirmed at 'F1+' and the Country Ceiling at 'AA+'. KEY RATING DRIVERS The revision of Chile's Outlook to Negative reflects prolonged economic weakness, which is contributing to a relatively rapid deterioration in the sovereign balance sheet. In Fitch's view, the policy response has helped buffer the economy and preserve credibility, but it has not prevented a substantial rise in the public debt burden from the low levels that underpinned the upgrade to 'A+' in 2011. Fitch projects growth will decelerate to 1.6% in 2016, from 2.3% in 2015. Mining output has fallen on declining ore grades, strikes, and lower prices. Non-mining activities have also slowed, reflecting low confidence restraining investment appetite and weakness in regional trading partners. Fitch projects further modest growth of 1.9% in 2017, balancing some improvement in external conditions and confidence with a subdued investment pipeline. As Chile's slowdown has appeared increasingly to be structural in nature, potential growth estimates have been cut (e.g. to 3% in 2016 from 4.8% in 2013 by the independent budget committee) and prospects for per-capita income convergence with the 'A' median have dimmed. The reform agenda aims to address bottlenecks in human capital and social equity, but businesses have reacted negatively as the near-term implications for profitability (due to higher taxes and new labor laws) have overshadowed the potential long-term benefits. Progress on the energy agenda and micro-reforms could help, but their impact remains uncertain. The fiscal position has deteriorated gradually against this weak economic backdrop. Copper royalties and taxes are officially projected to fall close to zero in 2016, from 2% of GDP in 2011, and could even be negative from private miners due to loss carry-back provisions in the tax code. The revenue boost from the 2014 tax reform is mostly offsetting this impact but is being used as intended primarily to fund higher health and education outlays. Fitch projects the central government deficit will widen to 3% of GDP in 2016 and 3.3% in 2017, from 2.2% in 2015. Sluggish growth is presenting difficult fiscal trade-offs. Last year, the government watered down its goals for free higher education and consolidation. Its new approach to the fiscal rule targets a trajectory for structural deficits (a reduction of 0.25 percentage points of GDP per year) instead of levels, avoiding the need for further consolidation efforts as cuts to the parameters (potential growth and long-term copper prices) have lifted structural deficit estimates. The 2017 budget achieves structural deficit reduction and social spending goals by cutting investment. In 2018, the boost from the tax reform will offer room for some progress on both goals. Consolidation looks tougher after 2018, given the tax reform will be fully phased in, social pressures could remain high, and appetite for new tax measures or investment cuts could be limited. Chile's sovereign balance sheet remains its key strength relative to peers, but it is experiencing the most rapid erosion of any sovereign in the 'A' category. Rising debt levels reflect fiscal deficits and additional financing needs including recapitalization of public companies and legacy public pension obligations. The financial strain at Codelco could add to sovereign borrowing needs should it require capitalization beyond the USD4 billion already authorized, or lead to legal changes that reduce its mandated fiscal contributions. Fitch projects general government debt will reach 21.4% of GDP at end-2016, double the level in 2011 when Chile was upgraded to 'A+'. Debt could surpass 30% by 2019, still well below the 'A' median of around 50%, but converging with the 'A' median as a share of revenues given a narrower revenue base. Chile's local market is well positioned to support higher sovereign borrowing needs. Stabilization funds worth 6% of GDP represent an additional financing buffer in the face of uncertainties in global borrowing conditions. The IDRs also reflect the following key rating factors: Chile's ratings are supported by a credible macro policy framework centered on an inflation-targeting regime, flexible exchange rate, and sovereign balance sheet that remains relatively strong despite the on-going deterioration. Favorable governance standards support the stability of the policy framework. These strengths counterbalance Chile's low per-capita GDP and high commodity dependence relative to peers. A robust and flexible policy framework has helped avoid macroeconomic imbalances amid the economic slowdown. Inflation fell back into the target range (3%+/-1pp) in August after several years above-target, and inflation expectations remained well anchored over this period. Banks have maintained solid asset quality and capitalization against the weak economic backdrop. Chile's external position adjusted early to the terms-of-trade shock, and the current account deficit has been stable at moderate levels and fully financed by foreign direct investment. Fitch expects broad macro policy continuity into the next administration following general elections in late 2017, although the focus of the social agenda and the consolidation strategy could vary depending upon who is elected. SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO) Fitch's proprietary SRM assigns Chile a score equivalent to a rating of 'A' on the Long-term FC IDR scale. Fitch's sovereign rating committee adjusted the output from the SRM to arrive at the final LT FC IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows: Macro: +1 notch, to reflect Chile's strong macro policy framework centered on rules-based fiscal policy, credible inflation-targeting regime and a flexible exchange rate. While this has preserved macro and external stability, it has not prevented a sustained weakening in economic performance; consequently, Fitch views Chile's relative strength for Macro to be on a declining path. Fitch's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employees 18 variables based on three year centered averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a LT FC IDR. Fitch's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM. RATING SENSITIVITIES The main factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to a downgrade are: --Sustained deterioration in public debt metrics and/or fiscal policy credibility; --Failure of growth and investment to recover materially. The Outlook is Negative. Consequently, Fitch does not currently anticipate developments with a high likelihood of leading to a positive change in the rating. Developments that could, individually or collectively, result in a stabilization of the Outlook include: --Fiscal consolidation that improves the outlook for stabilization of debt metrics; --A material improvement in growth prospects. KEY ASSUMPTIONS --Fitch's base case assumes that China's economy slows in a sustainable and orderly manner and that copper prices will not deviate substantially from recent levels despite recent volatility. --The investment plans of Codelco and other private sector companies are sufficient to maintain broadly steady copper production. Contact: Primary Analyst Todd Martinez Associate Director +1-212-908-0897 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 Secondary Analyst Shelly Shetty Senior Director +1-212-908-0324 Committee Chairperson Paul Gamble Senior Director +44 203 530 1623 Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email: elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Country Ceilings (pub. 16 Aug 2016) here Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1016392 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below