December 22, 2016 / 3:07 PM / in 7 months

Fitch Affirms 3 Mid-Sized Georgian Banks

15 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) MOSCOW/LONDON, December 22 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of Cartu Bank (Cartu) at 'B+', Basisbank (Basis) at 'B' and Halyk Bank Georgia (HBG) at 'BB-'. The Outlooks are Stable. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS - ALL BANKS' IDRs, VIABILITY RATINGS (VRs) The IDRs of Cartu and Basis are driven by their intrinsic strength, as reflected by their Viability Ratings (VRs) of 'b+' and 'b', respectively. The VRs reflect both banks' solid capital buffers (stronger at Cartu), good profitability and acceptable asset quality metrics. The VRs also consider the banks' large balance-sheet concentrations, high loans dollarisation (on average, 67% of the total) and franchise limitations. The Stable Outlooks on Cartu and Basis reflect Fitch's expectation that the banks' sizeable loss absorption buffers will provide resilience to potential moderate asset quality deterioration, as loans start seasoning after previous rapid growth and following depreciation of the lari. Severe stresses from the operating environment are unlikely, as reflected by the Stable Outlook on the sovereign rating. HBG's IDRs are driven by potential support it may receive, in case of need, from its sole shareholder Halyk Bank of Kazakhstan (HBK, BB/Stable). The Stable Outlook on HBG mirrors that on its parent. Fitch has not assigned a VR to HBG because of its high management and operational integration with HBK, small size and significant reliance on parent funding. CARTU's VR At end-1H16, non-performing loans (NPLs, overdue more than 90 days), including legacy exposures originated in 2011, comprised a high 9% of gross loans (unchanged from end-2015) although they were reasonably 86%-covered by reserves. High FX lending, mostly to unhedged borrowers, and large borrower and sector concentrations heighten the bank's risk profile. At end-1H16, top 25 exposures made up to 60% of gross loans; the largest construction and real estate segment accounted for 23% of loans. The bank's annual credit growth has been rapid at around 47% on average in 2013-2015 but moderated sharply to 9% in 1H16. NPL origination (calculated as net change in NPLs plus write-offs divided by average performing loans) was a low 1.5% in 1H16, annualised (2015: 2.5%). Profitability metrics have been volatile through the cycle, affected by one-off events in 2015, but remain reasonable, with ROAE of 16% in 1H16 (2015: 21%). Cartu's capitalisation remains strong - Fitch Core Capital Ratio (FCC) of 20% at end-1H16, despite the recent negative trend due to the lari depreciation and loan book growth. We estimate that the bank could increase its impairment reserves up to 16% of end-1H16 loans without breaching the regulatory Tier 1 capital ratio. The subordinated debt contributed by the shareholder, equal to 10% of risk-weighted assets, provides additional loss-absorption capacity. Customer funding (69% of total non-equity liabilities) is highly concentrated but generally stable: the top 20 largest deposits comprised 73% of the total. Related-party deposits accounted for 27% of total end-1H16 liabilities. The liquidity buffer was moderate, at around 28% of end-3Q16 customer accounts. BASIS'S VR NPLs remained low at 2% of loans at end-1H16 (unchanged from end-2015), fully covered by reserves. Restructured loans added a further 3% of gross loans, but these were fully performing. High FX-lending, large borrower and sector concentrations (top 25 exposures made up 45% of gross loans; 22% of corporate loans were from the largest construction and real estate segment) are sources of heightened credit risk. The bank's lending volumes stagnated in 1H16, after rapid growth of 68% on average in 2013-2015. NPL origination was low at 0.3% in 1H16 (2015: 2%). Profitability metrics are adequate with annualised 14% ROAE in 1H16, although slightly weaker than at other Fitch-rated banks mainly due to lower interest rates Basis offers on its loans to capture market share. The bank's capitalisation remains strong with a high 22% FCC ratio at end-1H16, while credit growth has subsided. Regulatory capitalisation was also reasonable, allowing the bank to increase its impairment reserves to 22% of loans without breaching the regulatory minimum levels. Customer funding (80% of end-1H16 liabilities) is concentrated. The top 20 depositors accounted for 62% of the total. Related-party funding was 13% of total customer accounts (end-2015: 29%). The liquidity buffer is solid, and would sustain an outflow of around 50% of customer accounts at end-3Q16. SUPPORT RATINGS, SUPPORT RATING FLOORS Cartu's and Basis's Support Rating of '5' and Support Rating Floor of 'No Floor' reflect the two banks' limited systemic importance, and consequently Fitch's view that state support cannot be relied upon. Potential support from the private shareholders is also not factored into the ratings, as it cannot be reliably assessed. HBG's Support Rating of '3' reflects moderate probability of support from HBK. The one-notch differential between HBK's and HBG's IDRs reflects the cross-border nature of the parent-subsidiary relationship, and the so far limited track record and contribution of the Georgian subsidiary to overall group performance. RATING SENSITIVITIES CARTU, BASIS Basis's ratings could benefit from an extended track record of profitable growth, while maintaining reasonable asset quality metrics and strengthening its franchise. The upside potential for Cartu's ratings is limited, although the diversification of the bank's profile and improvements in asset-quality metrics would be credit positive. Downward pressure on both banks' ratings may result from further rapid growth or a marked deterioration in asset quality metrics leading to a significant capital erosion. HBG HBG's support-driven Long-Term IDR is sensitive to changes in Fitch's assessment of support from its parent bank. The rating actions are as follows: Cartu Bank Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B+'; Outlook Stable Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating: affirmed at 'b+' Support Rating: affirmed at '5' Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'No Floor' JSC Basisbank Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR affirmed at 'B'; Outlook Stable Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating: affirmed at 'b' Support Rating: affirmed at '5' Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'No floor' Halyk Bank Georgia Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'BB-', Outlook Stable Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B' Support Rating: affirmed at '3' Contact: Primary Analyst Alyona Plakhova Associate Director +7 495 956 2409 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow Secondary Analyst Konstantin Alekseenko Analyst +7 495 956 2401 Committee Chairperson Alexander Danilov Senior Director +7 495 956 24 08 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email: elaine.bailey@fitchratings.com; Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email: julia.belskayavontell@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1016956 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below