Outside world has few options to ease Kenya tensions

By Peter Apps - Analysis

LONDON (Reuters) - While eager to stem violence after Kenya's disputed election, the international community has few immediate options beyond simply trying to persuade the government and opposition to talk to lower tensions.

Only last week, Kenya was talked of as a beacon of political and economic stability in a volatile region as it went to the polls in the tightest election since independence.

Now, rights groups put the death toll from ethnic clashes at more than 300, with the government accusing the opposition of planning "genocide" and both sides saying the vote that put President Mwai Kibaki in power was rife with rigging.

European Union election monitors have said the poll lacked credibility, but experts say while some sanctions are possible they would lack impact and not stem immediate violence.

And they would focus blame on the government, in a situation where it is difficult to assign blame to one side or the other in the mix of apparent fraud and ethnic violence.

The United States initially congratulated Kibaki, but later joined Britain in raising concerns over the result. Experts say serious talk is the best next step forward.

"The first thing is to reduce the violence and the second is to address issues around the election," said Sally Healy, associate fellow at London's Royal Institute of International Affairs.

"It is not so much about pressure as simply helping them to get to the stage where they can resolve the situation. Countries like Britain always want to be seen as doing something -- but the African way is to do things much more behind closed doors."