Hilary Benn rejects "war on terror" phrase

By Patrick Worsnip

NEW YORK (Reuters) - International Development Secretary Hilary Benn aspiring to higher office later this year took aim at key elements of the Bush administration's policy on Monday, rejecting its phrase "war on terror" as only likely to encourage terrorists.

Speaking in New York, Benn disputed the notion that military and economic force alone could solve world problems and restated support for the International Criminal Court, shunned by Washington.

When Prime Minister Tony Blair resigns in the next few months after 10 years in power, Benn is seen as a potential candidate for either deputy premier or foreign secretary if, as expected, Chancellor Gordon Brown replaces Blair.

Addressing the Centre for International Cooperation think tank in New York, scene of the September 11 attacks in 2001, Benn contested the words "war on terror" to describe a policy launched by U.S. President George W. Bush after those attacks. He did not specifically mention U.S. policy.

"In the UK, we do not use the phrase 'war on terror' because we can't win by military means alone, and because this isn't us against one organised enemy with a clear identity and coherent set of objectives," he said.

"What these (terrorist) groups want is to force their individual and narrow values on others, without dialogue, without debate, through violence. And by letting them feel part of something bigger, we give them strength."

Benn's speech appeared to reflect a shifting tide in British politics after the strongly pro-American policies of Blair, which antagonised his Labour party. They hope Brown, if he takes over, will be cooler to Washington.

In implied criticism of Bush's emphasis on armed might and sanctions to deal with Washington's foes, Benn also said "hard power" -- military and economic force -- needed to be complemented by "soft power" -- values and ideas.