U.S. officers say they're impartial in Guantanamo case

By Jim Loney

GUANTANAMO BAY U.S. NAVAL BASE, Cuba (Reuters) - One of the U.S. military officers called as a potential juror in the trial of Osama bin Laden's driver had a college roommate who worked at the Pentagon when a hijacked jet crashed into it on September 11, 2001, and was worried her friend might have been hurt.

She was selected on Monday for the jury.

Another officer was at the Pentagon and watched the jetliner burn after escaping the damaged military headquarters when the hijacked plane crashed, killing 184 people. He was rejected.

The jury pool in the trial of Salim Ahmed Hamdan were all members of the U.S. military fighting the Bush administration's war on terrorism. They all said they could be impartial in deciding his guilt or innocence in the first U.S. war crimes trial since World War Two, which started on Monday.

Some of the many critics of the military tribunals set up by President George W. Bush to try terrorism suspects have complained there is a fatal flaw in a system that calls on U.S. military officers to judge the alleged enemy fighters they are making war on.

Hamdan, a Yemeni who is charged with conspiracy and providing support to terrorists, sat before the uniformed U.S. officers in the Guantanamo courtroom dressed in traditional garb, a white headdress and long white robe, over which he wore a Western-style suit jacket.

All six jurors who will hear the case were seated on Monday. Their identities are being kept secret.

In questioning, the potential jurors said the events of September 11 would not cloud their judgment.