Troop cuts may take heat out of U.S. Iraq debate

By Andrew Gray - Analysis

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The prospect of sizable troop cuts in Iraq may allow both U.S. presidential candidates to claim vindication, defusing what was once expected to be an explosive election issue.

Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois still have significant differences in how they view Iraq and those could come into sharper focus if current security improvements are not sustained.

But security gains in Iraq and recent policy statements in Baghdad and Washington suggest that the candidates, the Bush administration, Iraqi leaders and U.S. commanders could all end up broadly in alignment over the way ahead in Iraq.

Obama, who visited Iraq earlier this week, has a goal of pulling all U.S. combat troops out of the country within 16 months of taking office -- giving him a target of mid-2010.

Obama wants to free up troops to tackle worsening violence in Afghanistan and commanders say the stretched U.S. military can only provide those forces once it has cut back in Iraq.

McCain also wants to send more troops to Afghanistan but he sees Iraq as the priority and favors the current policy of withdrawing troops from there gradually as commanders deem an area is safe enough to remain stable without U.S. forces.

But if Iraq continues to stabilize as it has over the past year, commanders' recommendations could allow troops to pull out roughly in line with Obama's timetable, some analysts say.

Adding to the impression of positions converging, the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki suggested during Obama's visit that foreign combat troops should be out of Iraq by the end of 2010, if security conditions allow.