LONDON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Merrill Lynch’s MER.N surprise write-down ratchets up pressure on rivals to cut the values of their own subprime assets as they grapple with mounting debts and economies weaken.
The global credit crisis, roughly a year under way, could cause total damage of around $1 trillion (500 billion pounds) to balance sheets of financial services companies. That’s far above the more than $400 billion of write-downs taken so far.
Merrill’s revelation of a $5.7 billion (2.8 billion pounds) write-down and plans to sell $8.5 billion of stock heightened worry of more pain to come from European lenders UBS UBSN.VX and Barclays (BARC.L), and from Wall Street and U.S. commercial banks.
About $4.4 billion of the Merrill write-down came from a sale of $30.6 billion of collateralized debt obligations — which are typically backed by mortgages — to private equity firm Lone Star Funds for $6.7 billion, or 22 cents on the dollar. Merrill had valued the CDOs at $11.1 billion just four weeks ago.
“It was a very aggressive markdown,” said Chris Henson, a portfolio manager at MFC Global Investment Management in Toronto. “The question is, is that now the clearing price for anyone who has CDOs?”
Prospects of more write-offs and credit losses have already battered lenders' shares. The Standard & Poor's Financials Index .GSPF, for example, had through Monday fallen 32 percent this year, twice the S&P 500's .SPX decline.
“The current environment is not one where people are prepared to give the benefit of the doubt,” said Gerry Rawcliffe, group credit officer for financial institutions at Fitch Ratings. “There’s a broad loss of confidence in banks.”
Merrill’s sale may also offer insight into the value of rivals’ so-called Level 2 and Level 3 assets. Banks value these based on prices of similar securities in the marketplace, or on their own models when there is no market for them.
“Other buyers out there are going to use this as a reference point,” said Michael Hampden-Turner, a Citigroup credit strategist. “The question is, to what extent does 22 cents constitute fair value, or the price at which a bank could offload a huge volume of very distressed assets?”
It remains difficult for outsiders to assess the quality of assets on balance sheets. Some banks, such as Barclays, claim their assets are better-quality and more well-hedged.
Citigroup said it ended June with $22.5 billion of subprime exposure. That included $18.1 billion of super-senior asset-backed securities CDOs (ABS CDOs), the kind of debt Merrill sold, including $14.4 billion of commercial paper.
Deutsche Bank Securities analyst Mike Mayo said Citigroup might face an $8 billion write-down on CDOs, as the bank has valued them at 53 cents on the dollar. Fox-Pitt Kelton analyst David Trone estimated a $4 billion write-down.
Citigroup spokeswoman Shannon Bell declined to comment. On July 18, Chief Financial Officer Gary Crittenden said: “There has not been a single American dollar cash flow loss against the asset-backed commercial paper ... I rush to add that that is not a forecast for the future.”
According to Oppenheimer & Co analyst Meredith Whitney, Lehman ended May with about $600 million of gross ABS CDO exposure, and $29.4 billion of commercial mortgage exposure. Lehman spokesman Randy Whitestone declined to comment.
Bank of America said it ended June with $8.43 billion of net CDO exposure, including $5.17 billion of subprime debt it was carrying at 43 percent of its original net exposure.
“We price our CDOs frequently during the quarter,” spokesman Bob Stickler said. “The values take into account everything, including underlying asset flows and external market events. We would certainly take the Merrill sale into account, but it wouldn’t be a single driver of valuation.”
European lenders may also take hits. Stuart Graham, a Merrill analyst in London, said that under his revised “stress test,” large banks on that continent may have $58 billion of future write-downs, up from his prior $22 billion assumption.
Falling asset values could also make lenders less able to lend or more skittish about extending credit.
“They become much more cautious,” Citigroup strategist Hampden-Turner said. “If you are a homeowner, it is harder to refinance. If you are a company, you can’t borrow money as before.”
Pacific Investment Management, where Chief Investment Officer Bill Gross runs the world’s biggest bond mutual fund, last week estimated that global banks could face $1 trillion in losses from the credit crisis and lowered asset prices.
Wachovia said it ended June with $5.86 billion of subprime exposure, including $4.38 billion of mostly hedged ABS CDOs. It also has a $122 billion portfolio of adjustable-rate mortgages where many borrowers owe more than their homes are worth.
Spokeswoman Christy Phillips-Brown declined to discuss the exposures, but said the fourth-largest bank is reducing risk, after losing $8.86 billion in the second quarter.
Wachovia has hired Goldman Sachs Group (GS.N), a Wall Street bank that largely sidestepped the credit crisis, for advice on what to do with its loan portfolio. Robert Steel, Wachovia’s new chief executive, is also a Goldman alumnus.