WILMINGTON, Del, Oct 21 (Reuters) - A Delaware judge on Wednesday rejected hedge fund Merion Capital’s attempt to wring an extra $150 million from the 2013 sale of BMC Software Inc by going to court and arguing that a fair deal price should have been much higher.
The case stemmed from the sale of BMC to a consortium including Bain Capital and Golden Gate Capital for $46.25 per share, for a total of $6.9 billion.
Just before the deal closed in 2013, funds affiliated with Merion Capital bought 7.6 million shares of BMC stock to pursue what has come to be known as “appraisal arbitrage,” an investing strategy that Merion helped pioneer.
After the deal closed, Merion Capital asked a Court of Chancery judge to find that the fair value of their stock was actually $67.08 and order BMC to pay it an added $20 per share above the deal price, or an extra $156 million.
However, Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock said in a 51-page opinion published Wednesday that a transparent sale was the best determinant of fair value.
“I find it appropriate to look to the price generated by the market through a thorough and vigorous sales process as the best indication of fair value under the specific facts presented here,” he wrote.
Glasscock said he settled on the deal price in part because of the wide differences in expert testimony about the fair value of BMC shares. The company argued for fair value at $37.88 per share.
Merion and its attorney at Ashby & Geddes in Wilmington, Delaware, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Critics say interest, which accrues at 5.75 percent on the investor’s holding during the case, encourages appraisal arbitrage. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has lobbied for legislation to cut the interest and limit appraisal to long-term investors.
Merion, founded by securities class action lawyer Andrew Barroway, has been a leader in bringing appraisal arbitrage cases. Earlier this year, Glasscock ruled against Merion in the buyout of Ancestry.com, also finding the deal price was fair.
One legal expert who studies appraisal said the Ancestry.com and BMC cases show investors need to understand when to seek appraisal.
“These cases suggest appraisal can still be a useful remedy for a stockholder, but you can’t just have a briefcase full of analysis and hope to pull the wool over a judge’s eyes,” said Minor Myers, a professor at Brooklyn Law School. (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by David Gregorio)