Reuters logo
Fitch Affirms Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) at 'A+'; Outlook Stable
July 13, 2017 / 4:43 PM / in 4 months

Fitch Affirms Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) at 'A+'; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) PARIS, July 13 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank's (ADIB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A+', Short-term IDR at 'F1', Viability Rating at 'bb', Support Rating (SR) at '1' and Support Rating Floor (SRF) at 'A+'. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS, SUPPORT RATING, SUPPORT RATING FLOOR AND DEBT ADIB's IDRs, Support Rating and Support Rating Floor reflect the extremely high probability of support available to the bank from the UAE and Abu Dhabi authorities if needed. Fitch's view of support factors in the sovereign's strong capacity to support the banking system, sustained by sovereign wealth funds and recurring revenue mostly from hydrocarbon production, despite lower oil prices, and the moderate size of the UAE banking sector in relation to the country's GDP. Fitch also expects high willingness from the authorities to support the banking sector, which has been demonstrated by the UAE authorities' long track record of supporting domestic banks, as well as close ties with and part government ownership links to a number of banks. ADIB's Support Rating Floor is at the Abu Dhabi Domestic Systemically Important Banks's (D-SIB) Support Rating Floor of 'A+', reflecting the bank's high systemic importance. Abu Dhabi banks' D-SIB Support Rating Floor is one notch higher than other UAE banks, due to Abu Dhabi's superior financial flexibility. ADIB Sukuk Company is rated in line with the bank's IDRs and is therefore subject to the same rating drivers. VR ADIB's VR reflects the bank's strong and resilient UAE-wide franchise, moderate pre-impairment profitability and sound balance sheet liquidity. However, the VR is undermined by weak asset quality and core capitalisation, sizeable balance sheet concentrations and high related-party lending. ADIB has maintained its 5% market share of UAE banking assets. It is the second largest UAE Islamic bank behind Dubai Islamic Bank and the fourth largest Islamic bank globally by total assets. Pre-impairment profitability is solid, at 3.7% of average gross loans in 1Q17, providing the bank with adequate ability to absorb potential credit losses through profits. ADIB's strong UAE-wide franchise is a strength for the bank's funding and liquidity. Customer deposits account for 93% of the bank's total funding base. Liquid assets cover 20% of total assets and 25% of total deposits, and the bank's loans-to-deposits ratio (79% at end-1Q17) compares well with UAE peer average. At end-1Q17 ADIB reported an impaired financing ratio of only 4.2%. However, when adding restructured exposures and 90 days past due but not impaired exposures, the problem financing ratio reached 10.9% at end-1Q17. While the coverage of impaired financing is sufficient at 92%, reserves coverage of problem loans is weak, at just below 35%. In addition, related-party financing accounts for 60% of equity. The major part of this financing is exposure to ADIB's controlling shareholder, translating into high financing concentration, with the top 20 exposures making up 22% of total gross financing. ADIB's Fitch Core Capital (FCC) ratio stood at a low 9.99% at end-1Q17 (compared with a peer average of 14.7%) although an improvement from 8.15% at end-2014 due to an AED504 million rights issue and lower financing growth. ADIB's regulatory Tier 1 ratio was adequate at 15.23% at end-1Q17, while the total capital ratio stood at 15.85%. With these capital ratios the bank could increase financing impairment reserves up to 9.2% of gross financing without breaching the 12% minimum requirement for capital adequacy ratio, which is below the bank's problem financing ratio. In assessing the ratings of ADIB, we considered important differences between Islamic and conventional banks. These factors include closer analysis of regulatory oversight, disclosure, accounting standards and corporate governance. Islamic banks' ratings do not express an opinion on the bank's compliance with sharia. Fitch will assess non-compliance with sharia if it has credit implications. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, SUPPORT RATING, SUPPORT RATING FLOOR AND DEBT ADIB's IDRs, Support Rating and Support Rating Floor are sensitive to a change in Fitch's view of the creditworthiness of the UAE and Abu Dhabi authorities and on their propensity to support the banking system or the bank. The sukuk issued under ADIB Sukuk Company are subject to the same sensitivities as the bank's IDRs. VR Pressure on ADIB's VR could result from deterioration in asset quality or core capital ratios, particularly concerning the recovery of legacy exposures. A sustained improvement in asset quality and capital ratios could lead to an upgrade of the VR. The rating actions are as follows: Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'A+'; Outlook Stable Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'F1' Viability Rating affirmed at 'bb' Support Rating affirmed at '1' Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'A+' ADIB Sukuk Company Limited: Trust certificate issuance programme affirmed at 'A+'/'F1' CRITERIA VARIATION: Under Fitch's Global Bank Rating Criteria, Fitch's SRFs are based on the ability and propensity of the government to provide support. Within the UAE, Fitch assesses the potential for support at federal level as Fitch believes that support would be forthcoming from the UAE authorities acting together. However, in respect of Abu Dhabi, Fitch has varied the criteria to reflect the superior financial flexibility of the Abu Dhabi authorities. As such, the SRFs for banks in Abu Dhabi are based on Fitch's assessment of the ability and propensity of the Abu Dhabi authorities to provide support in its own right. This results in a one notch higher SRF for Abu Dhabi banks (compared with other UAE banks), and results in a notch-higher rating for the bank. Contact: Primary Analyst Eric Dupont Senior Director +33 1 4429 9131 Fitch France S.A.S. 60 rue de Monceau 75008 Paris Secondary Analyst Nicolas Charreyron Analyst +971 4 424 1208 Committee Chairperson Alexander Danilov Senior Director +7 495 956 24 08 Media Relations: Rose Connolly, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1741, Email:; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Criteria for Rating Sukuk (pub. 16 Aug 2016) here Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below