Reuters logo
Fitch Affirms Canadian Banks; Fundamentals Outweigh Persistent Housing Risks
October 27, 2017 / 6:24 PM / a month ago

Fitch Affirms Canadian Banks; Fundamentals Outweigh Persistent Housing Risks

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) NEW YORK, October 27 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings of the seven largest Canadian banking institutions by assets (referred to as Canadian Banks) following a peer review committee. The seven financial institutions included in this peer review are: --Bank of Montreal (BMO; rated 'AA-/F1+'); --Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS; rated 'AA-/F1+'); --Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC; rated 'AA-/F1+'); --Federation des caisses Desjardins du Quebec (FCDQ; rated 'AA-/F1+'); --National Bank of Canada (NBC; rated 'A+/F1'); --Royal Bank of Canada (RY; rated 'AA/F1+'); --Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD; rated 'AA-/F1+'). The ratings for the major Canadian banks are among the highest in Fitch's global bank universe. In Fitch's view, the ratings reflect the sound fundamentals at these banks, as evidenced by consistent earnings performance through various credit cycles and sound capital and solid liquidity financial profiles. The big six Canadian banks and FCDQ operate in a highly concentrated banking system within a highly developed economy and solid banking regulatory framework. Fitch also believes barriers to entry remain high, which benefits the large banks' performance. The Rating Outlook is Stable for BMO, BNS, NBC, TD and FCDQ. The Rating Outlook has been revised to Stable from Negative for RBC. The Rating Outlook has been revised to Negative from Stable for CIBC. For detailed ratings and rationale, please refer to individual rating action commentaries released separately on each bank. RY's Stable Rating Outlook reflects that while its growing capital markets business could increase overall operating performance volatility over a long-term horizon, Fitch does not believe it will have an outsize impact during the Outlook horizon. RY's ratings and Stable Outlook are also supported by the company's solid domestic franchise, geographic diversification and consistent operating performance. CIBC's Negative Outlook reflects previously highlighted sensitivities to its continued sizeable mortgage growth relative to its peers, which is concerning at this point of the credit cycle. Further, in Fitch's view, CIBC's concentration in Canadian consumer asset classes, particularly at a time of record levels of debt, makes it more vulnerable to downside risks. CIBC's ratings are supported by its solid franchise and sound financial measures. Fitch believes that all Canadian banks are exposed to credit deterioration in their domestic loan portfolios. Fitch has highlighted asset quality deterioration as a high influence factor for current ratings for all Canadian banks. To date, consumer assets, particularly mortgage, continue to perform well, but the banks' ratings would be sensitive to weakening gross impaired loans, loan impairment charges and delinquency rates above long-run averages. Fitch's ratings and Outlooks incorporate a modest deterioration in asset quality in the context of healthy capital levels and solid earnings power. Fitch has highlighted the operating environment as a higher influence for the Canadian bank ratings. This reflects the two key risks for the banking system which are the intertwined unsustainable rise in home prices, particularly in Toronto, and the record level of household debt. The combination of these two factors makes borrowers vulnerable to a sharp increase in unemployment or interest rates and could hurt lenders' asset quality. While unemployment is not expected to weaken over the Outlook horizon, Fitch anticipates further increases in interest rates by the Bank of Canada, which are forecasted to reach 2.25% in 2019. This could affect asset quality performance, particularly if monetary policy changes faster or further than expected. The Canadian economy has bounced back from the slowdown experienced in 2015 and 2016. Fitch revised its forecast for GDP growth up to 3.1% for 2017 and 2.0% for 2018. As such, economic conditions should remain favorable. However, a severe correction in the housing market could impact future growth given the sizeable contribution consumption and residential investments make to GDP over the last several years. Further, Fitch assumes that the renegotiation of the NAFTA treaty does not significantly disadvantage Canada's competitiveness in the U.S. market. According to Fitch's RMBS group, housing markets in several major metropolitan areas are increasingly vulnerable to a price correction due to a rise in values not fully supported by underlying fundamentals. Home prices in Toronto and Vancouver have increased 45% and 36%, respectively, since the start of 2015. According to Fitch's most recent sustainable home price model, Canadian home prices are overvalued by approximately 25% with major regional variations. If government actions (i.e. tightening in borrower qualification standards) slow home price growth and there is no unexpected shock to the economy, a soft landing or mild correction is likely. However, if home prices continue on the current trajectory, the housing market will become increasingly vulnerable to an unexpected shock and severe correction. Today's ratings affirmations incorporate a rating case scenario for price correction in the market of about 10%-15% over time. Fitch's base case assumption is not a forecast of home prices but rather a view on the level of home price change that on its own would not likely affect ratings. Should home prices decline at a faster pace and/or more severely, ratings could be pressured. Fitch's rating affirmations recognize recent macro-prudential policy changes designed to cool the housing market, which include: tighter requirements for mortgage insurance, and tax changes and recent regulation implemented by local authorities in Ontario. Fitch views these policy initiatives as proactive and prudent given the continued increase in home prices. In Toronto and Vancouver, overvaluation has become a significant policy concern. Although it is too early to assess whether increased housing market regulations will have a long-term impact, early signs suggest that there has been a slowdown in re-sell activity, and listings have increased for Toronto and Vancouver. An orderly slowdown in the pace of home price appreciation or even modest correction may be viewed as supportive to current Canadian bank ratings. However, should the cumulative effect of all these housing and mortgage market initiatives potentially cause more significant disruptions to the mortgage market, this may negatively impact the Canadian banks' ratings and/or Rating Outlooks. However, Fitch would assess the materiality of the impact on each bank individually. In the event of a severe economic shock, Fitch expects that Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) would act as a shock absorber for the insured mortgage exposure. CMHC, a crown corporation, explicitly guarantees a large portion of the mortgages on bank balance sheets (on average 50% of total Canadian residential mortgage portfolios, which supports the Canadian banks ratings. Fitch also remains cautious given record levels of consumer indebtedness. Consumer debt to disposable income stood at 169.9% at end-June 2017, which is amongst the highest compared to G7 countries. More recently, Bank of Canada has increased its benchmark rate by 50bps in July and September erasing the previous two rate cuts from 2015 following the commodity price decline. Should interest rates rise rapidly, marginal borrowers may be pressured, which could impact asset quality and potentially lead to an overall slowdown in the economy. On June 16, 2017, the Department of Finance and the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions released a draft of bail-in regulations and TLAC guidelines for Domestic Systemically Important Banks with a compliance date of Nov. 1, 2021. The draft provides clarity for liabilities that will be eligible for bail-in conversion, requirements for qualifying bail-in debt, and compensation regulations. Given the exclusion of deposits from bail-in, Fitch believes this creates a "de facto" depositor preference regime in a resolution scenario. However, senior debt and uninsured deposits would rank pari passu under a liquidation scenario. The bail-in resolution proposals did not address the pari passu ranking of deposits in liquidation. Fitch may assign deposit ratings, but uplift may be limited as their ranking will depend on the resolution path chosen. Likewise, Fitch may also consider assigning derivative counterparty ratings reflecting the higher ranking of these obligations, given that they are excluded from bail-in dependent on the ranking of these obligations in liquidation. For now, Fitch equalizes the ratings for senior bail-in debt to the long-term Issuer Default Rating (IDR). A rating distinction could be introduced between the IDR and legacy senior debt in the future if the bail-in debt built over time provides a sufficient qualifying junior debt buffer that structurally benefits senior non-bail-in debt holders. Contact: Doriana Gamboa Senior Director +1-212-908-0865 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 Christopher Wolfe Managing Director +1-212-908-0771 Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212-908-0278, Email: sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below