Reuters logo
Fitch Affirms Dongfeng Motor Group at 'A'; Outlook Stable
September 27, 2017 / 3:41 AM / 20 days ago

Fitch Affirms Dongfeng Motor Group at 'A'; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) HONG KONG, September 26 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Chinese automaker Dongfeng Motor Group Company Limited's (DFG)'s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and senior unsecured rating at 'A'. The Outlook on the IDR is Stable. The agency also affirmed the rating on the senior unsecured notes issued by Dongfeng Motor (Hong Kong) International Co., Ltd. and guaranteed by DFG at 'A'. The affirmation follows the agency's upgrade of DFG's standalone credit profile to 'BBB+' from 'BBB', while the previous three-notch uplift has been changed to a two-notch uplift, reflecting the agency's reassessment of DFG's operational and strategic linkage with the central government, through its parent, Dongfeng Motor Corporation (DFM). This results in the final rating unchanged at 'A.' DFM, which owns 66.86% of DFG, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) and one of three automotive manufacturers owned and supervised by the state. DFG's rating is equalised with DFM's due to strong parent and subsidiary linkage. The upgrade of DFG's standalone rating comes after DFM, as a group, has demonstrated its ability to retain its market leadership as the second-largest automaker in China and maintained business stability across market cycles, especially amid an industry-wide slowdown of auto sales in 1H15 and 1H17, backed by a well-balanced brand and product portfolio. In particular, its leadership in China's fast-growing, margin-rich sport utility vehicle (SUV) segment has provided it with a sufficient buffer in market downturns. At the same time, DFM has maintained a strong financial profile that maps to the 'A' category. Fitch proportionately consolidates DFM's joint ventures to assess the group's credit profile. The reassessment of DFM's linkage with the central government follows a comparison with other SASAC-owned state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that are rated with a three-notch uplift from their standalone credit profiles, including CRRC Corporation Limited (A+/Stable), China Shenhua Energy Company Limited (A+/Stable) and CNOOC Limited (A+/Stable). These companies have more dominant market positions in strategic sectors or play more influential roles in helping the central government to achieve its policy objectives than DFG/DFM. KEY RATING DRIVERS Demonstrated Stable Business: DFM's net revenue grew 7.4% to CNY268 billion in 2016 and its EBITDA margin improved to 9.0% from 8.8% in 2015 on a proportionately consolidated basis. DFM's two Sino-Japanese joint ventures (JVs) performed well with sound growth and stable margins. Rapid growth at Dongfeng Honda, its JV with Japan's Honda Motor Co., Ltd (A/Stable), led to improved profitability that was more than enough to offset the weakness in DPCA, DFG's JV with the Paris-based Peugeot S.A. (BB+/Stable). DFM remained the second-largest player in China with 15.3% of total vehicle sales volume in 2016. JV Diversification Lowers Business Risk: DFM operates through multiple JVs carrying different brands, including Honda, Nissan, Infiniti, Peugeot, Citroen, Renault and Kia. The JV structure helps to lower its business risks from heavy R&D expenditure or new product failures, while its well-diversified brand portfolio cuts the risks associated with customer preference, brand reputation and geo-politics. Sustained SUV Leadership: DFM has kept its No.1 position among all Chinese auto groups in the medium-sized SUV market over the past six years and has rapidly built up its share to become a leading producer in the small-sized SUV market since 2015. We believe DFM's leadership in the fast-growing, margin-rich SUV market will provide it with a sufficient buffer in market downturns as consumers have shown a strong preference for SUVs amid the rapidly changing demand dynamics of China's passenger vehicle market. The SUV market has sustained a strong CAGR of 45.8% from 2012 to 2016, while the sedan market has been through multiple cycles of sales decline and recovery. Strong FCF, Net Cash Balance: DFM's net cash balance increased to CNY55.6 billion as of end-2016 from CNY43.1 billion at end-2015 on a proportionately consolidated basis. DFM sustained strong FCF generation in 2016, thanks to a solid FFO margin, improved working capital days, moderate capex needs and stable dividend payments. DFM's major JVs contributed around CNY10 billion in cash dividends in 2016. Moderate Strategic Linkage with Government: SASAC and the central government have demonstrated a commitment to support DFM in becoming the flagship automobile company in China and are ready to provide strong policy and financial support should it run into difficulties. However, the social impact of a DFM default, in terms of employment or social unrest, is assessed to be relatively moderate, compared with other central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with dominant positions in less commercialised sectors. We expect DFM to maintain moderate operational and strategic linkages with the central government as DFM is responsible for carrying out the central government's strategic objectives in developing the automotive industry. DERIVATION SUMMARY DFG's rating is equalised to its parent DFM, which is based on a standalone rating of 'BBB+' plus a two-notch uplift reflecting DFM's moderate operational and strategic linkages with the central government. DFM/DFG's business profile is comparable with industrial manufacturing companies in China in the 'BBB' category in terms of scale and market position, such as Weichai Power Co., Ltd. (BBB+/Stable), but weaker than 'A-' rated companies such as CRRC Corporation (A+/Stable, standalone A-) that have dominant market positions in their respective industries. DFM/DFG's business risk is comparable with its 'BBB+' rated global peers, such as Hyundai Motor Company (BBB+/Stable) and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (BBB+/Stable), given its multiple-JV structure and well-diversified brand and product portfolio, despite its relatively small scale and limited geographical diversification outside of China. DFM's financial profile is within the 'A' category with its stable FFO margin, sustained positive FCF and deep net cash position. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include: - JV structure remains the main form to enter the Chinese market for foreign auto players - Top-line growth rate sustained at around mid-single digits - Margin to increase slightly in the next three years due to higher revenue contribution from higher-margin JVs - Dividend payout ratio of around 8%-10% RATING SENSITIVITIES Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action -Positive rating action is not expected in the medium term as it would require a major change of business profile, including global diversification. Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action -Weakening linkage with the SASAC. -Sustained deterioration of its business profile, including material adverse regulatory developments. - DFM - excluding JVs - generates negative free cash flow on a sustained basis and/or loses its net cash position. LIQUIDITY Strong Liquidity: As of end-2016, DFM and DFG had total unutilised credit facilities of more than CNY40 billion (out of which CNY26 billion was granted to DFG) and CNY41.5 billion of unrestricted cash (JV cash excluded). Strong Access to External Financing: DFM/DFG's status as a leading central SOE has enabled it to enjoy good relationships with domestic banks and obtain easy access to both onshore and offshore capital market financing. Its refinancing risk is low. Contact: Primary Analyst Yee Man Chin Director +852 2263 9696 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong Secondary Analyst Cathy Chao Associate Director +852 2263 9967 Committee Chairperson Su Aik Lim Senior Director +852 2263 9914 For regulatory purposes in various jurisdictions, the supervisory analyst named above is deemed to be the primary analyst for this issuer; the principal analyst is deemed to be the secondary. Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Corporate Rating Criteria (pub. 07 Aug 2017) here Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage (pub. 31 Aug 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below