July 11, 2017 / 11:48 AM / a year ago

Fitch Affirms Kenya at 'B+'; Outlook Negative

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) HONG KONG/LONDON, July 11 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Kenya's Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'B+' with a Negative Outlook. The issue ratings on Kenya's senior unsecured foreign-currency bonds are also affirmed at 'B+'. The Country Ceiling has been affirmed at 'BB-' and the Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs at 'B'. KEY RATING DRIVERS The 'B+' ratings reflect Kenya's solid growth record, strong medium-term growth potential, and favourable business environment. However, the ratings are constrained by Kenya's low GDP per capita, sizeable current account and budget deficits, and political risks. Fitch forecasts GDP growth to slow to 5.4% in 2017, down from the 5.8% outturn in 2016. In 1Q17, growth slowed to 4.7% year on year, as the agricultural sector contracted 1.1% due to drought conditions. Slowing credit growth and uncertainty around the August elections are also weighing on the economy. However, Fitch continues to assess Kenya's medium-term growth potential as strong, sustained by improved security that has fuelled a recovery in tourism and high public spending that supports the construction sector. Fitch's baseline scenario envisages some limited disruption around the 8 August general elections, in which incumbent President Uhuru Kenyatta and his ruling Jubilee coalition will face opposition candidate Raila Odinga, who leads the newly constituted National Super Alliance (NASA) coalition. Odinga has been a candidate for the presidency three times previously, including in 2007 when protests of the outcome of the election triggered widespread ethnic and political violence. We do not foresee violence at the level of 2007; however, the opposition's frequent disputes with the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Committee raise the prospect that an NASA loss could lead to protests. In addition to presidential and parliamentary elections, Kenyans will also go to the polls to select governors and representatives for the 47 counties established by Kenya's 2010 Constitution. The devolution of a greater share of fiscal and political power to the counties could be a touchpoint for an increase in violence at the local level. Fiscal consolidation has yet to begin. Fitch estimates that the general government deficit in the fiscal year that ended in June 2017 widened to 8.3% of GDP, above both the government's revised target of 6.9%, published in the Medium Term 2017 Budget Policy Statement and the 7.5% outturn in FY16. The deterioration in the fiscal deficit relative to the prior year was largely due to an increase in execution of capital expenditure to fund ongoing infrastructure projects, including the just-completed Phase 1 of the Standard Gauge Railway, and election-related current expenditure. General government expenditure was an estimated 29.4% of GDP in FY17, up from an average of 25.2% in the previous five years. Kenya's FY17/18 Budget signals that the government plans to shrink the deficit and prioritise public debt sustainability. Fitch forecasts the fiscal deficit to narrow to 6.4% of GDP in FY18, as expenditure falls closer to average historical levels and improvements to revenue administration and collection begin to show results. Fitch's forecast is more conservative than the government's budget target of 6% of GDP, reflecting downside risks from slower-than- expected growth and lower revenue collection. General government debt reached 56% of GDP at FY17 (measured by the nominal value of debt), a level comparable to 'B' rated peers; however, debt servicing costs consume an outsized portion of Kenya's revenue. Both total debt and interest payments as a percentage of revenue, at 262% and 16.5% respectively, are higher than the 'B' medians of 227% and 9.6%. The key downside risk to public debt sustainability would be the government's inability to implement the fiscal consolidation envisaged in the FY17/18 Budget and the Medium Term Expenditure Framework. Over the medium term, the failure to translate newly built infrastructure into private sector growth and higher tax revenue would also be a threat to fiscal consolidation and to debt sustainability. The drop in agricultural output has contributed to higher food prices and pushed inflation higher so far in 2017. Headline inflation peaked at 11.7% in May, before falling to 9.2% in June, well above the Central Bank of Kenya's (CBK) 5%/-2.5% inflation target. The CBK will likely hold off on further monetary easing until inflationary pressures subside. Fitch forecasts the current account deficit will widen slightly to 5.8% of GDP in 2017 from 5.6% in 2016, but will remain well below the average of 9.2% recorded in 2011 to 2015. Lower oil prices, higher remittance flows and stabilising capital imports have all contributed to the narrowing current account deficit. Kenya's continued compliance with its IMF stand-by arrangement, which would make up to USD1.5 billion available in the event of a negative balance of payments shock. The Kenyan banking sector is highly fragmented, with large domestic banks characterised by healthy funding and balance-sheet liquidity and small banks, into which we have little insight. Asset quality has deteriorated, with non-performing loans rising to 10% of total loans as of end-April 2017 from 6% at end-2015. Additionally, the full effects of the interest rate cap that was instituted in September 2016 have yet to become clear, but initial indications show evidence of credit rationing. Initial results suggest that the cap has had a marginal downward effect on credit growth, particularly in credit to SMEs and other high-risk segments of the credit market. Overall private sector credit growth has slowed further, to 3.3% at end-March 2017, continuing a trend in place since 2015 when it grew 17.8%. Kenya has continued to improve its rank in the World Bank's Doing Business Index, rising to 92 in the 2017 ranking from 113 in the previous year. However, structural factors constrain the rating. The country is in the 22nd percentile of the UN Human Development Index. Kenya's governance indicators are weaker than the 'B' range median. SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO) Fitch's proprietary SRM assigns Kenya a score equivalent to a rating of 'B+' on the Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR scale. Fitch's sovereign rating committee did not adjust the output from the SRM to arrive at the final Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR Fitch's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three year-centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR. Fitch's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM. RATING SENSITIVITIES The main factors that could individually, or collectively, trigger a downgrade are: - Failure to implement planned fiscal consolidation and stabilise government debt/GDP; - Deterioration in the political or security environment undermining Kenya's long-term growth performance; - Widening of the current account deficit that stresses macroeconomic stability and leads to significant foreign exchange reserves drawdown. The Outlook is Negative. Consequently, Fitch does not currently anticipate developments with a high likelihood of leading to positive rating action. Developments that could, individually or collectively, result in the Outlook to being revised to Stable include: - Effective implementation of fiscal consolidation plans and stabilisation of government debt/GDP; - A longer track record of prudent economic management and successful implementation of structural reforms that foster an improved business environment and faster economic growth. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch assumes the global economy evolves broadly in line with the projections in its latest "Global Economic Outlook". Contact: Primary Analyst Jermaine Leonard Director +852 2263 9830 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong Secondary Analyst Ed Parker Managing Director +44 20 3530 1176 Committee Chair Stephen Schwartz Senior Director +852 2263 9938 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com; Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Country Ceilings (pub. 16 Aug 2016) here Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below