March 10, 2017 / 11:58 AM / 9 months ago

Fitch Affirms PJSC MTS Bank at 'B+'; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) MOSCOW, March 10 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed PJSC MTS Bank's (MTSB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+'. The Outlook is Stable. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS, NATIONAL LONG-TERM RATING, SUPPORT RATING The affirmation of MTSB's IDRs, and National Long-Term and Support Ratings reflects Fitch's view that the bank would likely be supported, in case of need, by its majority shareholder, Sistema Joint Stock Financial Corp. (Sistema; BB-/Stable) and/or its subsidiaries. This view is mainly based on the (i) the track record of capital support, including RUB15 billion of equity, provided in 2016; (ii) MTSB's role as a treasury for the group; and (iii) the brand association with OJSC Mobile TeleSystems (MTS, BB+/Stable), a major operating subsidiary of the group. At the same time, the one-notch difference between the ratings of Sistema and MTSB reflects the bank's weak performance to date, and its limited franchise and therefore strategic importance for the group. VIABILITY RATING MTSB's 'b-' Viability Rating (VR) reflects weaknesses in the bank's credit profile, in particular asset quality and financial performance. At the same time the VR is supported by improved core capital buffer following RUB15 billion equity injection in 2016 and by adequate liquidity. Non-performing loans (NPLs, including all loans over 90 days) fell to 39% of loans at end-2016 from 42% at end-2015, due to RUB14 billion write-offs. NPLs were moderately reserved by 88% with the unreserved portion equal to 22% of Fitch Core Capital (FCC) at end-2016. Positively, restructured exposures were a low 3% of total loans (8% at end-2015) and lending in foreign currency (FC) was also moderate at 16%. In 2016 the bank revised its underwriting policies and reduced its risk appetite (eg. it ceased providing large long-term corporate investment loans, and in retail it is focusing on cross-selling to its existing lower-risk clients and on lending in MTS retail chain) resulting in markedly reduced NPL origination (calculated as net increase in NPLs plus write-offs divided by average performing loans) to a low 1.5% (2.9% in retail) in 2016, from double digits in 2015. MTSB's capitalisation improved with the FCC ratio increasing to 17% at end-2016 from 8% at end-2015, mostly due to fresh equity injection in 2016. However, Tier 1 capital under local GAAP was moderate at 9.5% at end-1M17 (minimum is 7.25% including capital conservation buffer) with the difference compared with FCC being mostly due to (i) consolidation of MTSB's subsidiary East-West United Bank (EWUB) under IFRS and (ii) deduction of deferred tax asset and investment into EWUB from Tier 1 capital under local GAAP. Fitch estimates that the bank's regulatory capital cushion was sufficient to potentially increase loan impairment reserves up to 42% from the current 38% without breaching minimum capital requirements. Additional moderate loss absorption capacity is also available through pre-impairment profit, which was equal to 2% of average loans in 2016. MTSB's liquidity position is strong, supported by significant and stable related-party funding (43% of total liabilities at end-2016). Funding concentration, apart from related-party funds, is moderate (the 20-largest not related clients accounted for a moderate 11% of end-2016 total accounts). Liquidity risk is also mitigated by MTSB's significant liquidity cushion, which covered more than 50% of total customer accounts (or a still reasonable 15% after repaying all parental funding) at end-2016. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, NATIONAL LONG-TERM RATING, SUPPORT RATING An upgrade/downgrade of Sistema would likely result in a similar rating action on MTSB's support-driven ratings. Failure of the parent to provide timely support, if needed, could result in a downgrade of the support-driven ratings. VR MTSB's VR could be downgraded if asset quality further deteriorates significantly and erodes capital. The VR could be upgraded on improvements in asset quality resulting in stronger financial performance. The rating actions are as follows: Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'B+', Stable Outlook Short-Term IDR affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating affirmed at 'b-' Support Rating affirmed at '4' Contact: Primary Analyst Sergey Popov Associate Director +7 495 956 9981 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow 115054 Secondary Analyst Alyona Plakhova Associate Director +7 495 956 9901 Committee Chairperson James Watson Managing Director +7 495 956 6657 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email:; Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1020374 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below