Reuters logo
Fitch: EU Bad Bank Faces Significant Hurdles
February 15, 2017 / 1:11 PM / 10 months ago

Fitch: EU Bad Bank Faces Significant Hurdles

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) LONDON, February 15 (Fitch) There are substantial hurdles to establishing an EU-wide bad bank, or asset management company (AMC), to deal with banks' bad loans, and EU state-aid rules would probably require losses for junior debt to cover associated asset write-downs, Fitch Ratings says. An EU-wide AMC could be positive for banking systems in countries with large volumes of non-performing loans (NPLs), helping banks to clean up balance sheets and reducing earnings volatility from loan loss provisions, which would benefit senior creditors. Recently, senior policymakers have discussed the prospect of a bad bank to deal with NPLs in the EU. In a presentation at the end of January, EBA chairperson Andrea Enria identified 10 countries with an NPL ratio above 10% and said that asset quality was an EU-wide problem. ECB Vice-President Vitor Constancio said in a speech on 3 February that high NPL levels weigh on bank profitability and that a European AMC would be a "welcomed initiative". <iframe src="//" title="EU NPLs as Percentage of Gross Loans at end-1H16" width="550" height="707" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"> Both policymakers envisaged that any AMC would operate within the EU bank-resolution and state-aid frameworks, and both discussed a "precautionary recapitalisation" approach with state funds used to help banks absorb the losses associated with offloading their NPLs to an AMC. We consider the creation of an EU- or eurozone-wide centrally funded AMC unlikely in the near term and believe any move towards further risk-mutualisation in the eurozone would be politically difficult, notably in Germany. Moves towards a eurozone-wide deposit insurance scheme stalled last year as several countries wanted further progress on risk-reducing measures before agreeing to share risk from other countries' banking systems. Fitch believes the most feasible AMC approach in the short term may be a "European blueprint" applied at a national level. Such a blueprint could help countries with high NPL levels to navigate the complications of the EU's Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and state-aid framework. Under this approach, the actual AMCs would probably be set up at national level, with capital injections or other state support funded by governments. Depending on its size and nature, state support could increase pressure on some sovereigns' finances, especially if it causes official debt statistics to worsen. Finding the appropriate price for NPLs is difficult. Investors want deep discounts to compensate for lengthy court proceedings and difficulty in realising collateral. Reduced valuations require banks to make additional provisions to increase coverage levels before selling assets or transferring them off balance sheet, which increases pressure on capital. We recognise EU-wide efforts to reform insolvency law and practice, but believe it will take time for these to be fully effective across the EU. The EBA presentation envisaged transferring NPLs at a "real economic value" (20% above market values), with a potential clawback later if the eventual sale price is lower than the transfer price. Such an approach could make it easier to meet EU rules that prohibit using a precautionary recapitalisation to offset losses already incurred or are likely to be incurred in the near future. However, we believe this approach creates a contingent liability for the bank and would reduce transparency, potentially hampering attempts to attract private capital. Under EU rules, a precautionary capitalisation requires a capital shortfall to be identified via a stress test. The EBA is not planning a stress test in 2017 but intends to run an exercise in 2018, although local supervisors are required to undertake annual stress tests. We would not expect an EU-wide AMC to lead directly to a greater lending supply. Other factors, such as economic prospects, are also important in stimulating lending and loan demand from creditworthy customers is being amply served by a strong supply of liquidity. Contact: Alan Adkins Group Credit Officer Financial Institutions +44 20 3530 1702 Fitch Ratings Limited 30 North Colonnade London E14 5GN Bridget Gandy Managing Director, Co-head EMEA Financial Institutions +44 20 3530 1095 David Prowse Senior Analyst Fitch Wire +44 20 3530 1250 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email: The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below